These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26418570)
1. Cost-effectiveness of RAS screening before monoclonal antibodies therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer based on FIRE3 Study. Wen F; Yang Y; Zhang P; Zhang J; Zhou J; Tang R; Chen H; Zheng H; Fu P; Li Q Cancer Biol Ther; 2015; 16(11):1577-84. PubMed ID: 26418570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of First-Line FOLFIRI Combined With Cetuximab or Bevacizumab in Patients With RAS Wild-Type Left-Sided Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Han J; Xiao D; Tan C; Zeng X; Hu H; Zeng S; Jiang Q; She L; Yao L; Li L; Tang L; Ma J; Huang J; Shen L Cancer Control; 2020; 27(1):1073274820902271. PubMed ID: 32107929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. CEA response is associated with tumor response and survival in patients with KRAS exon 2 wild-type and extended RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer receiving first-line FOLFIRI plus cetuximab or bevacizumab (FIRE-3 trial). Michl M; Stintzing S; Fischer von Weikersthal L; Decker T; Kiani A; Vehling-Kaiser U; Al-Batran SE; Heintges T; Lerchenmueller C; Kahl C; Seipelt G; Kullmann F; Stauch M; Scheithauer W; Hielscher J; Scholz M; Mueller S; Lerch MM; Modest DP; Kirchner T; Jung A; Heinemann V; Ann Oncol; 2016 Aug; 27(8):1565-72. PubMed ID: 27234640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness of FOLFIRI + cetuximab vs FOLFIRI + bevacizumab in the first-line treatment of Stintzing S; van Oostrum I; Pescott CP; Ronga P; Heeg B; Heinemann V J Med Econ; 2020 May; 23(5):448-455. PubMed ID: 31903807 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Economic Evaluation of mFOLFOX6-based First-line Regimens for Unresectable Advanced or Recurrent Colorectal Cancer Using Clinical Decision Analysis]. Shida T; Endo Y; Shiraishi T; Yoshioka T; Suzuki K; Kobayashi Y; Ono Y; Ito T; Inoue T Yakugaku Zasshi; 2018; 138(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 29311468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Economic evaluation study (CHEER-compliant): Cost-effectiveness analysis of RAS screening for treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer based on the CALGB 80405 trial. Zhou J; Zhao R; Wen F; Zhang P; Tang R; Chen H; Zhang J; Li Q Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Jul; 95(27):e3762. PubMed ID: 27399059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-Effectiveness of Cetuximab as First-line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in the United States. Shankaran V; Ortendahl JD; Purdum AG; Bolinder B; Anene AM; Sun GH; Bentley TGK Am J Clin Oncol; 2018 Jan; 41(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 26398184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer (FIRE-3): a post-hoc analysis of tumour dynamics in the final RAS wild-type subgroup of this randomised open-label phase 3 trial. Stintzing S; Modest DP; Rossius L; Lerch MM; von Weikersthal LF; Decker T; Kiani A; Vehling-Kaiser U; Al-Batran SE; Heintges T; Lerchenmüller C; Kahl C; Seipelt G; Kullmann F; Stauch M; Scheithauer W; Held S; Giessen-Jung C; Moehler M; Jagenburg A; Kirchner T; Jung A; Heinemann V; Lancet Oncol; 2016 Oct; 17(10):1426-1434. PubMed ID: 27575024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. KRAS and BRAF mutation analysis in metastatic colorectal cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis from a Swiss perspective. Blank PR; Moch H; Szucs TD; Schwenkglenks M Clin Cancer Res; 2011 Oct; 17(19):6338-46. PubMed ID: 21807639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Economic analysis of bevacizumab, cetuximab, and panitumumab with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Lawrence D; Maschio M; Leahy KJ; Yunger S; Easaw JC; Weinstein MC J Med Econ; 2013 Dec; 16(12):1387-98. PubMed ID: 24102083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Continuation of Bevacizumab vs Cetuximab Plus Chemotherapy After First Progression in KRAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The UNICANCER PRODIGE18 Randomized Clinical Trial. Bennouna J; Hiret S; Bertaut A; Bouché O; Deplanque G; Borel C; François E; Conroy T; Ghiringhelli F; des Guetz G; Seitz JF; Artru P; Hebbar M; Stanbury T; Denis MG; Adenis A; Borg C JAMA Oncol; 2019 Jan; 5(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 30422156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficacy, Tolerability, and Biomarker Analyses of Once-Every-2-Weeks Cetuximab Plus First-Line FOLFOX or FOLFIRI in Patients With KRAS or All RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The Phase 2 APEC Study. Cheng AL; Cornelio G; Shen L; Price T; Yang TS; Chung IJ; Dai GH; Lin JK; Sharma A; Yeh KH; Ma B; Zaatar A; Guan Z; Masood N; Srimuninnimit V; Yau T; Gibbs P; Wang X; Doval DC; Oh ST; Shim BY; Gorospe C; Wang HM; Sirachainan E; Hill A; Suh KW; Beier F; Chatterjee S; Lim R Clin Colorectal Cancer; 2017 Jun; 16(2):e73-e88. PubMed ID: 27780749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Economic Analysis of Panitumumab Compared With Cetuximab in Patients With Wild-type KRAS Metastatic Colorectal Cancer That Progressed After Standard Chemotherapy. Graham CN; Maglinte GA; Schwartzberg LS; Price TJ; Knox HN; Hechmati G; Hjelmgren J; Barber B; Fakih MG Clin Ther; 2016 Jun; 38(6):1376-1391. PubMed ID: 27085587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A retrospective analysis on first-line bevacizumab, cetuximab, and panitimumab-containing regimens in patients with RAS-wild metastatic colorectal cancer: A Collaborative Study by Turkish Oncology Group (TOG). Degirmencioglu S; Tanriverdi O; Menekse S; Dogan M; Hacıoglu B; Oktay E; Erdem D; Arpaci E; Uluc BO; Turhal S; Yilmaz M; Pilanci KN; Sakin A; Araz M; Cokmert S; Ozdemir O; Sen E; Nayir E J BUON; 2019; 24(1):136-142. PubMed ID: 30941962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-effectiveness of KRAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer patients in the United States and Germany. Vijayaraghavan A; Efrusy MB; Göke B; Kirchner T; Santas CC; Goldberg RM Int J Cancer; 2012 Jul; 131(2):438-45. PubMed ID: 21898389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. RAS testing of liquid biopsy correlates with the outcome of metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with first-line FOLFIRI plus cetuximab in the CAPRI-GOIM trial. Normanno N; Esposito Abate R; Lambiase M; Forgione L; Cardone C; Iannaccone A; Sacco A; Rachiglio AM; Martinelli E; Rizzi D; Pisconti S; Biglietto M; Bordonaro R; Troiani T; Latiano TP; Giuliani F; Leo S; Rinaldi A; Maiello E; Ciardiello F; Ann Oncol; 2018 Jan; 29(1):112-118. PubMed ID: 28950295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of BRAF and RAS mutations on first-line efficacy of FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab: analysis of the FIRE-3 (AIO KRK-0306) study. Stintzing S; Miller-Phillips L; Modest DP; Fischer von Weikersthal L; Decker T; Kiani A; Vehling-Kaiser U; Al-Batran SE; Heintges T; Kahl C; Seipelt G; Kullmann F; Stauch M; Scheithauer W; Held S; Moehler M; Jagenburg A; Kirchner T; Jung A; Heinemann V; Eur J Cancer; 2017 Jul; 79():50-60. PubMed ID: 28463756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multicenter Phase II study of FOLFOX or biweekly XELOX and Erbitux (cetuximab) as first-line therapy in patients with wild-type KRAS/BRAF metastatic colorectal cancer: The FLEET study. Soda H; Maeda H; Hasegawa J; Takahashi T; Hazama S; Fukunaga M; Kono E; Kotaka M; Sakamoto J; Nagata N; Oba K; Mishima H BMC Cancer; 2015 Oct; 15():695. PubMed ID: 26467662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of FOLFIRI-Based First-Line Regimens for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Using Clinical Decision Analysis. Shida T; Ono Y; Kobayashi Y; Ogura J; Hatakeyama S; Arakawa I; Inoue T; Yamaguchi H Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2024 May; 51(5):541-547. PubMed ID: 38881065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Consequences of Biomarker Analysis on the Cost-Effectiveness of Cetuximab in Combination with FOLFIRI as a First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Personalised Medicine at Work. Harty G; Jarrett J; Jofre-Bonet M Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2018 Aug; 16(4):515-525. PubMed ID: 29948926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]