These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26418794)
1. Systematic Reviews in Craniofacial Trauma-Strengths and Weaknesses. Hunter C; Januszyk M; Wan DC; Momeni A Ann Plast Surg; 2016 Sep; 77(3):363-8. PubMed ID: 26418794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The quality of systematic reviews in hand surgery: an analysis using AMSTAR. Momeni A; Lee GK; Talley JR Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 Apr; 131(4):831-837. PubMed ID: 23542254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Systematic reviews addressing microsurgical head and neck reconstruction. Momeni A; Jacobson JY; Lee GK J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 26(1):210-3. PubMed ID: 25478976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in pediatric surgery. Salim A; Mullassery D; Losty PD J Pediatr Surg; 2017 Nov; 52(11):1732-1735. PubMed ID: 28830620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Quality of Systematic Reviews in Head and Neck Microsurgery: A Perspective from Plastic Surgery and Otolaryngology. Sun BJ; Tijerina J; Nazerali RS; Lee GK Ann Plast Surg; 2018 May; 80(5S Suppl 5):S267-S273. PubMed ID: 29489536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A systematic assessment of Cochrane reviews and systematic reviews published in high-impact medical journals related to cancer. Goldkuhle M; Narayan VM; Weigl A; Dahm P; Skoetz N BMJ Open; 2018 Mar; 8(3):e020869. PubMed ID: 29581210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The quality of systematic reviews addressing peripheral nerve repair and reconstruction. Sun BJ; Tijerina JD; Agbim UN; Lee GK; Nazerali RS J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2019 Mar; 72(3):447-456. PubMed ID: 30655242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A systematic review of the quality of distal radius systematic reviews: Methodology and reporting assessment. Belloti JC; Okamura A; Scheeren J; Faloppa F; Ynoe de Moraes V PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0206895. PubMed ID: 30673700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Methodological and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews Published in the Highest Ranking Journals in the Field of Pain. Riado Minguez D; Kowalski M; Vallve Odena M; Longin Pontzen D; Jelicic Kadic A; Jeric M; Dosenovic S; Jakus D; Vrdoljak M; Poklepovic Pericic T; Sapunar D; Puljak L Anesth Analg; 2017 Oct; 125(4):1348-1354. PubMed ID: 28678074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of imaging specialists as authors of systematic reviews on diagnostic and interventional imaging and its impact on scientific quality: report from the EuroAIM Evidence-based Radiology Working Group. Sardanelli F; Bashir H; Berzaczy D; Cannella G; Espeland A; Flor N; Helbich T; Hunink M; Malone DE; Mann R; Muzzupappa C; Petersen LJ; Riklund K; Sconfienza LM; Serafin Z; Spronk S; Stoker J; van Beek EJ; Vorwerk D; Di Leo G Radiology; 2014 Aug; 272(2):533-40. PubMed ID: 24738613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR. Dosenovic S; Jelicic Kadic A; Vucic K; Markovina N; Pieper D; Puljak L BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 May; 18(1):37. PubMed ID: 29739339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Erectile Dysfunction Treatment and Management Published in the Sexual Medicine Literature. Greenberg DR; Richardson MT; Tijerina JD; Bass MB; Eisenberg ML J Sex Med; 2019 Mar; 16(3):394-401. PubMed ID: 30773501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions. Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Methodological and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Endodontics. Nagendrababu V; Pulikkotil SJ; Sultan OS; Jayaraman J; Peters OA J Endod; 2018 Jun; 44(6):903-913. PubMed ID: 29602531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Methodological quality and risk of bias in orthodontic systematic reviews using AMSTAR and ROBIS. Hooper EJ; Pandis N; Cobourne MT; Seehra J Eur J Orthod; 2021 Oct; 43(5):544-550. PubMed ID: 33723612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A flood tide of systematic reviews on endodontic posts: methodological assessment using of R-AMSTAR. Schmitter M; Sterzenbach G; Faggion CM; Krastl G Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jun; 17(5):1287-94. PubMed ID: 23436119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Epidemiology, methodological and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews of nursing interventions published in China. Shi C; Zhu L; Wang X; Qin C; Xu Q; Tian J Int J Nurs Pract; 2014 Dec; 20(6):689-700. PubMed ID: 25532885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How is AMSTAR applied by authors - a call for better reporting. Pieper D; Koensgen N; Breuing J; Ge L; Wegewitz U BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Jun; 18(1):56. PubMed ID: 29914386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effectiveness and safety of acupuncture for treating functional constipation: An overview of systematic reviews. Yao JP; Chen LP; Xiao XJ; Hou TH; Zhou SY; Xu MM; Wang K; Hou YJ; Zhang L; Li Y J Integr Med; 2022 Jan; 20(1):13-25. PubMed ID: 34838459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Epidemiology, quality and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews of traditional Chinese medicine interventions published in Chinese journals. Ma B; Guo J; Qi G; Li H; Peng J; Zhang Y; Ding Y; Yang K PLoS One; 2011; 6(5):e20185. PubMed ID: 21633698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]