These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26419088)
1. [Human frontal inclination of the skull as a trait of sexual dimorphism--terminology and quantification]. Kölzer SC; Kümmell IV; Kölzer JT; Ramsthaler F; Plenzig S; Gehl A; Verhoff MA Arch Kriminol; 2015; 235(1-2):11-21. PubMed ID: 26419088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Definitions of frontal bone inclination: Applicability and quantification. Koelzer SC; Kuemmel IV; Koelzer JT; Ramsthaler F; Holz F; Gehl A; Verhoff MA Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Oct; 303():109929. PubMed ID: 31472305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of craniometric traits in South Indian dry skulls for sex determination. Ramamoorthy B; Pai MM; Prabhu LV; Muralimanju BV; Rai R J Forensic Leg Med; 2016 Jan; 37():8-14. PubMed ID: 26519924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sex Recognition of Skulls in Chinese Uygur. Yang W; Liu XN; Zhu F; Liu XL; Zhu LP Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Apr; 35(2):200-204. PubMed ID: 31135115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sexual dimorphism and regional variation in human frontal bone inclination measured via digital 3D models. Petaros A; Garvin HM; Sholts SB; Schlager S; Wärmländer SKTS Leg Med (Tokyo); 2017 Nov; 29():53-61. PubMed ID: 29073532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Recent human sexual dimorphism study using cephalometric plots on lateral teleradiography and discriminant function analysis. Veyre-Goulet SA; Mercier C; Robin O; Guérin C J Forensic Sci; 2008 Jul; 53(4):786-9. PubMed ID: 18544115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative Sex Estimation Based on Cranial Traits Using R Functions. Nikita E J Forensic Sci; 2019 Jan; 64(1):175-180. PubMed ID: 29856889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The skull and humerus in the determination of sex: reliability of discriminant function equations. Robinson MS; Bidmos MA Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Apr; 186(1-3):86.e1-5. PubMed ID: 19216037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Size factor as one of the problems in the sex estimation of skulls: upper palaeolithic sample from Predmostí (Czech Republic) as an example. Sefcáková A; Katina S; Velemínski J; Brůzek J; Velemínský P; Thurzo M Anthropol Anz; 2010; 68(2):221-37. PubMed ID: 21452686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Frontal Sinus Cavity Exhibits Sexual Dimorphism in 3D Cone-beam CT Images and can be Used for Sex Determination. Choi IGG; Duailibi-Neto EF; Beaini TL; da Silva RLB; Chilvarquer I J Forensic Sci; 2018 May; 63(3):692-698. PubMed ID: 28731499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of the anthropometric measurements of skeletonized skulls with corresponding measurements of their 3D reconstructions obtained by CT scanning. Lorkiewicz-Muszyńska D; Kociemba W; Sroka A; Kulczyk T; Żaba C; Paprzycki W; Przystańska A Anthropol Anz; 2015; 72(3):293-301. PubMed ID: 26131560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sexual dimorphism in Brazilian human skulls: discriminant function analysis. Fortes de Oliveira O; Lima Ribeiro Tinoco R; Daruge Júnior E; Silveira Dias Terada AS; Alves da Silva RH; Paranhos LR J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2012 Dec; 30(2):26-33. PubMed ID: 23474506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sexual dimorphism of foramen magnum using Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Tambawala SS; Karjodkar FR; Sansare K; Prakash N; Dora AC J Forensic Leg Med; 2016 Nov; 44():29-34. PubMed ID: 27591340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of metric sex analysis of skeletal remains using Fordisc based on a recent skull collection. Ramsthaler F; Kreutz K; Verhoff MA Int J Legal Med; 2007 Nov; 121(6):477-82. PubMed ID: 17899153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative analysis of four morphometric methods for sex estimation: A study conducted on human skulls. Sinhorini PA; Costa IAP; Lopez-Capp TT; Biazevic MGH; de Paiva LAS Leg Med (Tokyo); 2019 Jul; 39():29-34. PubMed ID: 31200148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Digital forensic osteology--possibilities in cooperation with the Virtopsy project. Verhoff MA; Ramsthaler F; Krähahn J; Deml U; Gille RJ; Grabherr S; Thali MJ; Kreutz K Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Jan; 174(2-3):152-6. PubMed ID: 17451898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Digital forensic osteology: morphological sexing of skeletal remains using volume-rendered cranial CT scans. Ramsthaler F; Kettner M; Gehl A; Verhoff MA Forensic Sci Int; 2010 Feb; 195(1-3):148-52. PubMed ID: 20074879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Exploratory analysis of new craniometric measures for the investigation of biological sex using open-access statistical and machine-learning tools on a cone-beam computed tomography sample. Machado CR; Curi JP; da Costa Moraes CA; Santos LV; Melani RFH; Chilvarquer I; Beaini TL Int J Legal Med; 2024 Nov; 138(6):2595-2605. PubMed ID: 38856752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy and reliability in sex determination from skulls: a comparison of Fordisc® 3.0 and the discriminant function analysis. Guyomarc'h P; Bruzek J Forensic Sci Int; 2011 May; 208(1-3):180.e1-6. PubMed ID: 21482050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sex determination by three-dimensional geometric morphometrics of the vault and midsagittal curve of the neurocranium in a modern Greek population sample. Chovalopoulou ME; Valakos ED; Manolis SK Homo; 2016 Jun; 67(3):173-87. PubMed ID: 27109917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]