114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26419088)
1. [Human frontal inclination of the skull as a trait of sexual dimorphism--terminology and quantification].
Kölzer SC; Kümmell IV; Kölzer JT; Ramsthaler F; Plenzig S; Gehl A; Verhoff MA
Arch Kriminol; 2015; 235(1-2):11-21. PubMed ID: 26419088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Definitions of frontal bone inclination: Applicability and quantification.
Koelzer SC; Kuemmel IV; Koelzer JT; Ramsthaler F; Holz F; Gehl A; Verhoff MA
Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Oct; 303():109929. PubMed ID: 31472305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of craniometric traits in South Indian dry skulls for sex determination.
Ramamoorthy B; Pai MM; Prabhu LV; Muralimanju BV; Rai R
J Forensic Leg Med; 2016 Jan; 37():8-14. PubMed ID: 26519924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sex Recognition of Skulls in Chinese Uygur.
Yang W; Liu XN; Zhu F; Liu XL; Zhu LP
Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Apr; 35(2):200-204. PubMed ID: 31135115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sexual dimorphism and regional variation in human frontal bone inclination measured via digital 3D models.
Petaros A; Garvin HM; Sholts SB; Schlager S; Wärmländer SKTS
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2017 Nov; 29():53-61. PubMed ID: 29073532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Recent human sexual dimorphism study using cephalometric plots on lateral teleradiography and discriminant function analysis.
Veyre-Goulet SA; Mercier C; Robin O; Guérin C
J Forensic Sci; 2008 Jul; 53(4):786-9. PubMed ID: 18544115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative Sex Estimation Based on Cranial Traits Using R Functions.
Nikita E
J Forensic Sci; 2019 Jan; 64(1):175-180. PubMed ID: 29856889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The skull and humerus in the determination of sex: reliability of discriminant function equations.
Robinson MS; Bidmos MA
Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Apr; 186(1-3):86.e1-5. PubMed ID: 19216037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Size factor as one of the problems in the sex estimation of skulls: upper palaeolithic sample from Predmostí (Czech Republic) as an example.
Sefcáková A; Katina S; Velemínski J; Brůzek J; Velemínský P; Thurzo M
Anthropol Anz; 2010; 68(2):221-37. PubMed ID: 21452686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Frontal Sinus Cavity Exhibits Sexual Dimorphism in 3D Cone-beam CT Images and can be Used for Sex Determination.
Choi IGG; Duailibi-Neto EF; Beaini TL; da Silva RLB; Chilvarquer I
J Forensic Sci; 2018 May; 63(3):692-698. PubMed ID: 28731499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of the anthropometric measurements of skeletonized skulls with corresponding measurements of their 3D reconstructions obtained by CT scanning.
Lorkiewicz-Muszyńska D; Kociemba W; Sroka A; Kulczyk T; Żaba C; Paprzycki W; Przystańska A
Anthropol Anz; 2015; 72(3):293-301. PubMed ID: 26131560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sexual dimorphism in Brazilian human skulls: discriminant function analysis.
Fortes de Oliveira O; Lima Ribeiro Tinoco R; Daruge Júnior E; Silveira Dias Terada AS; Alves da Silva RH; Paranhos LR
J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2012 Dec; 30(2):26-33. PubMed ID: 23474506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sexual dimorphism of foramen magnum using Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
Tambawala SS; Karjodkar FR; Sansare K; Prakash N; Dora AC
J Forensic Leg Med; 2016 Nov; 44():29-34. PubMed ID: 27591340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of metric sex analysis of skeletal remains using Fordisc based on a recent skull collection.
Ramsthaler F; Kreutz K; Verhoff MA
Int J Legal Med; 2007 Nov; 121(6):477-82. PubMed ID: 17899153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative analysis of four morphometric methods for sex estimation: A study conducted on human skulls.
Sinhorini PA; Costa IAP; Lopez-Capp TT; Biazevic MGH; de Paiva LAS
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2019 Jul; 39():29-34. PubMed ID: 31200148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Digital forensic osteology--possibilities in cooperation with the Virtopsy project.
Verhoff MA; Ramsthaler F; Krähahn J; Deml U; Gille RJ; Grabherr S; Thali MJ; Kreutz K
Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Jan; 174(2-3):152-6. PubMed ID: 17451898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Digital forensic osteology: morphological sexing of skeletal remains using volume-rendered cranial CT scans.
Ramsthaler F; Kettner M; Gehl A; Verhoff MA
Forensic Sci Int; 2010 Feb; 195(1-3):148-52. PubMed ID: 20074879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy and reliability in sex determination from skulls: a comparison of Fordisc® 3.0 and the discriminant function analysis.
Guyomarc'h P; Bruzek J
Forensic Sci Int; 2011 May; 208(1-3):180.e1-6. PubMed ID: 21482050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sex determination by three-dimensional geometric morphometrics of the vault and midsagittal curve of the neurocranium in a modern Greek population sample.
Chovalopoulou ME; Valakos ED; Manolis SK
Homo; 2016 Jun; 67(3):173-87. PubMed ID: 27109917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A geometric morphometric approach to the study of sexual dimorphism in the modern human frontal bone.
Del Bove A; Profico A; Riga A; Bucchi A; Lorenzo C
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2020 Dec; 173(4):643-654. PubMed ID: 33025582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
