These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
11. Predicting Binding Poses and Affinities in the CSAR 2013-2014 Docking Exercises Using the Knowledge-Based Convex-PL Potential. Grudinin S; Popov P; Neveu E; Cheremovskiy G J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Jun; 56(6):1053-62. PubMed ID: 26569136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of GalaxyDock Based on the Community Structure-Activity Resource 2013 and 2014 Benchmark Studies. Shin WH; Lee GR; Seok C J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Jun; 56(6):988-95. PubMed ID: 26583962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cross-docking benchmark for automated pose and ranking prediction of ligand binding. Wierbowski SD; Wingert BM; Zheng J; Camacho CJ Protein Sci; 2020 Jan; 29(1):298-305. PubMed ID: 31721338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. CSAR data set release 2012: ligands, affinities, complexes, and docking decoys. Dunbar JB; Smith RD; Damm-Ganamet KL; Ahmed A; Esposito EX; Delproposto J; Chinnaswamy K; Kang YN; Kubish G; Gestwicki JE; Stuckey JA; Carlson HA J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Aug; 53(8):1842-52. PubMed ID: 23617227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Integration of Ligand and Structure Based Approaches for CSAR-2014. Prathipati P; Mizuguchi K J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Jun; 56(6):974-87. PubMed ID: 26492437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Blind Pose Prediction, Scoring, and Affinity Ranking of the CSAR 2014 Dataset. Martiny VY; Martz F; Selwa E; Iorga BI J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Jun; 56(6):996-1003. PubMed ID: 26391724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]