These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26419273)

  • 1. Clinical negligence in hospitals in France and England.
    Kelly MJ; de Bono Q C J; Métayer P
    Med Leg J; 2015 Dec; 83(4):203-13. PubMed ID: 26419273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Poor agreement among expert witnesses in bile duct injury malpractice litigation: an expert panel survey.
    de Reuver PR; Dijkgraaf MG; Gevers SK; Gouma DJ;
    Ann Surg; 2008 Nov; 248(5):815-20. PubMed ID: 18948809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Neuroscience in the Courtroom: From responsibility to dangerousness, ethical issues raised by the new French law].
    Gkotsi GM; Moulin V; Gasser J
    Encephale; 2015 Oct; 41(5):385-93. PubMed ID: 25439859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Medical expert opinion: performance, the appearance in court in cases of medical malpractice].
    García-Garduza I
    Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc; 2011; 49(5):563-70. PubMed ID: 22185861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Medical expert assessment in the Anglo-American lawsuit].
    Deutsch E
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1996 Nov; 90(7):648-52. PubMed ID: 9064941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adapting to concurrent expert evidence in medical litigation.
    Cockburn T; Madden B
    J Law Med; 2015 Mar; 22(3):610-31. PubMed ID: 25980193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Drafting expert opinion reports in medical liability processes].
    Ulsenheimer K
    Anaesthesist; 2011 Dec; 60(12):1146-51. PubMed ID: 22146837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Inequity of compensation trajectories for victims of medical injuries. A survey in the French out-of-court settlement mechanism].
    Parizot I; Cailbault I; Winance M; Barbot J
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2017 Apr; 65(2):99-108. PubMed ID: 28236496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Development of expert assessment in the malpractice lawsuit from the viewpoint of the judge].
    Franzki H
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1996 Nov; 90(7):652-6; discussion 656-7. PubMed ID: 9064942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Conclaves and concurrent expert evidence: a positive development in Australian legal practice?
    Madden B; Cockburn T
    Med J Aust; 2016 Feb; 204(2):82-3. PubMed ID: 26821112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Medical negligence in cardiology: enter the lawyers and the experts and, then, the judge].
    Schwartz PJ; Lia F
    G Ital Cardiol (Rome); 2024 Jun; 25(6):390-397. PubMed ID: 38808934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Expert scientific evidence under the adversarial system. A travesty of justice?
    Havard JD
    J Forensic Sci Soc; 1992; 32(3):225-35. PubMed ID: 1431800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Judgment at medico-legal dispute].
    Furukawa T
    Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1999 Nov; 100(11):756-60. PubMed ID: 10629844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. For debate: the short report - legal and ethical implications.
    Whitfield HN; van Dellen A
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2021 Sep; 103(8):544-545. PubMed ID: 34464566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Medical negligence in orthopaedic surgery: a review of 130 consecutive medical negligence reports.
    Gidwani S; Zaidi SM; Bircher MD
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Feb; 91(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 19190045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Medicolegal issues for the respiratory paediatrician.
    Balfour-Lynn IM
    Paediatr Respir Rev; 2022 Mar; 41():3-7. PubMed ID: 29108867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of the expert witness in the adversarial legal system.
    Beran RG
    J Law Med; 2009 Aug; 17(1):133-7. PubMed ID: 19771993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of plaintiff and defense expert witness qualifications in malpractice litigation in anesthesiology.
    Radvansky BM; Farver WT; Svider PF; Eloy JA; Gubenko YA; Eloy JD
    Anesth Analg; 2015 Jun; 120(6):1369-74. PubMed ID: 25988639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Medical expert assessment in criminal processes from the legal viewpoint].
    Ulsenheimer K
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1996 Nov; 90(7):574-81. PubMed ID: 9064925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Medical expert assessment in civil and criminal law--stand for evaluating medical expert assessment].
    Kienzle HF
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1996 Nov; 90(7):592-6. PubMed ID: 9064929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.