116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26419306)
1. ACR BI-RADS Use in Low-Income Countries: An Analysis of Diagnostic Breast Ultrasound Practice in Uganda.
Scheel JR; Nealey EM; Orem J; Bugeza S; Muyinda Z; Nathan RO; Porter PL; Lehman CD
J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Feb; 13(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 26419306
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Training the ACRIN 6666 Investigators and effects of feedback on breast ultrasound interpretive performance and agreement in BI-RADS ultrasound feature analysis.
Berg WA; Blume JD; Cormack JB; Mendelson EB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Jul; 199(1):224-35. PubMed ID: 22733916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Performance of users in tropical areas with the BI-RADS classification of breast lesions for predicting malignancy].
Gonsu Kamga JE; Moifo B; Sando Z; Guegang Goudjou E; Nko'o Amvene S; Gonsu Fotsin J
Med Sante Trop; 2013; 23(4):439-44. PubMed ID: 24334372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Malpractice and breast cancer: perceptions versus reality.
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Feb; 192(2):334-6. PubMed ID: 19155391
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Intraobserver interpretation of breast ultrasonography following the BI-RADS classification.
Calas MJ; Almeida RM; Gutfilen B; Pereira WC
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jun; 74(3):525-8. PubMed ID: 19423260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Breast localization techniques and margin definitions used by Australian and New Zealand surgeons.
Taylor DB; Bourke AG; Hobbs MM; Dixon G; Phillips M; Saunders CM
ANZ J Surg; 2016 Oct; 86(10):744-745. PubMed ID: 27701839
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of posttreatment imaging and biomarker testing for survivors of breast cancer.
Barton MK
CA Cancer J Clin; 2016 May; 66(3):175-6. PubMed ID: 26991239
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41.
Hooley RJ; Greenberg KL; Stackhouse RM; Geisel JL; Butler RS; Philpotts LE
Radiology; 2012 Oct; 265(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 22723501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multicenter study of ultrasound real-time tissue elastography in 779 cases for the assessment of breast lesions: improved diagnostic performance by combining the BI-RADS®-US classification system with sonoelastography.
Wojcinski S; Farrokh A; Weber S; Thomas A; Fischer T; Slowinski T; Schmidt W; Degenhardt F
Ultraschall Med; 2010 Oct; 31(5):484-91. PubMed ID: 20408116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reader practice in mammography screen reading in Australia.
Cawson J
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Dec; 53(6):514-5. PubMed ID: 20002281
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The accuracy of BI-RADS classification of breast ultrasound as a first-line imaging method.
Hille H; Vetter M; Hackelöer BJ
Ultraschall Med; 2012 Apr; 33(2):160-3. PubMed ID: 21877320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of classification of breast ultrasound findings based on criteria used for BI-RADS.
Heinig J; Witteler R; Schmitz R; Kiesel L; Steinhard J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 32(4):573-8. PubMed ID: 18421795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. International studies make case for high mammo volume.
Ward P
Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 2000 Jan; Suppl():9-11. PubMed ID: 10848423
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Does power Doppler ultrasonography improve the BI-RADS category assessment and diagnostic accuracy of solid breast lesions?
Tozaki M; Fukuma E
Acta Radiol; 2011 Sep; 52(7):706-10. PubMed ID: 21596798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Could ultrasonic elastography help the diagnosis of small (≤2 cm) breast cancer with the usage of sonographic BI-RADS classification?
Zhi H; Xiao XY; Ou B; Zhong WJ; Zhao ZZ; Zhao XB; Yang HY; Luo BM
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3216-21. PubMed ID: 22608397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Neddle-guided biopsy in the diagnosis of non-palpable breast cancer].
Becerra-Alcántara GI; Círigo-Villagómez LL; Ramos-Medina F; Robledo-Martínez H; Mar-Merinos CG; Panzi-Altamirano RM
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2015 Jul; 83(7):400-7. PubMed ID: 26422910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interobserver variability of ultrasound elastography and the ultrasound BI-RADS lexicon of breast lesions.
Park CS; Kim SH; Jung NY; Choi JJ; Kang BJ; Jung HS
Breast Cancer; 2015 Mar; 22(2):153-60. PubMed ID: 23584596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Are you dense?
Evers K
Acad Radiol; 2015 Jun; 22(6):677-8. PubMed ID: 25872859
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Automated breast ultrasound: lesion detection and BI-RADS classification--a pilot study.
Wenkel E; Heckmann M; Heinrich M; Schwab SA; Uder M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz WA; Janka R
Rofo; 2008 Sep; 180(9):804-8. PubMed ID: 18704878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Breast sonoelastography: Now and in the future.
Mesurolle B; El Khoury M; Chammings F; Zhang M; Sun S
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2019 Oct; 100(10):567-577. PubMed ID: 30935864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
