BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26419441)

  • 1. Dental amalgam artifact: Adverse impact on tumor visualization and proton beam treatment planning in oral and oropharyngeal cancers.
    Richard P; Sandison G; Dang Q; Johnson B; Wong T; Parvathaneni U
    Pract Radiat Oncol; 2015; 5(6):e583-8. PubMed ID: 26419441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of two commercial CT metal artifact reduction algorithms for use in proton radiotherapy treatment planning in the head and neck area.
    Andersson KM; Dahlgren CV; Reizenstein J; Cao Y; Ahnesjö A; Thunberg P
    Med Phys; 2018 Oct; 45(10):4329-4344. PubMed ID: 30076784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impacts of dental filling materials on RapidArc treatment planning and dose delivery: challenges and solution.
    Mail N; Albarakati Y; Ahmad Khan M; Saeedi F; Safadi N; Al-Ghamdi S; Saoudi A
    Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081714. PubMed ID: 23927311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dosimetric impact of commercial CT metal artifact reduction algorithms and a novel in-house algorithm for proton therapy of head and neck cancer.
    Branco D; Kry S; Taylor P; Zhang X; Rong J; Frank S; Followill D
    Med Phys; 2021 Jan; 48(1):445-455. PubMed ID: 33176003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Iterative metal artifact reduction improves dose calculation accuracy : Phantom study with dental implants.
    Maerz M; Mittermair P; Krauss A; Koelbl O; Dobler B
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2016 Jun; 192(6):403-13. PubMed ID: 26968180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Feasibility and robustness of dose painting by numbers in proton therapy with contour-driven plan optimization.
    Barragán AM; Differding S; Janssens G; Lee JA; Sterpin E
    Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):2006-17. PubMed ID: 25832091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spot-scanning beam proton therapy vs intensity-modulated radiation therapy for ipsilateral head and neck malignancies: a treatment planning comparison.
    Kandula S; Zhu X; Garden AS; Gillin M; Rosenthal DI; Ang KK; Mohan R; Amin MV; Garcia JA; Wu R; Sahoo N; Frank SJ
    Med Dosim; 2013; 38(4):390-4. PubMed ID: 23916884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dose uncertainties in IMPT for oropharyngeal cancer in the presence of anatomical, range, and setup errors.
    Kraan AC; van de Water S; Teguh DN; Al-Mamgani A; Madden T; Kooy HM; Heijmen BJ; Hoogeman MS
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Dec; 87(5):888-96. PubMed ID: 24351409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adequate margins for random setup uncertainties in head-and-neck IMRT.
    Astreinidou E; Bel A; Raaijmakers CP; Terhaard CH; Lagendijk JJ
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Mar; 61(3):938-44. PubMed ID: 15708278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Initial implementation of the conversion from the energy-subtracted CT number to electron density in tissue inhomogeneity corrections: an anthropomorphic phantom study of radiotherapy treatment planning.
    Tsukihara M; Noto Y; Sasamoto R; Hayakawa T; Saito M
    Med Phys; 2015 Mar; 42(3):1378-88. PubMed ID: 25735292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The dosimetric effect of zipper artifacts on tomotherapy adaptive dose calculation--a phantom study.
    Geng H; Yu SK; Lam WW; Wong WK; Ho YW; Liu SF
    Med Dosim; 2011; 36(3):306-12. PubMed ID: 21093252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the impact of dental artefacts on intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning for the head and neck.
    Webster GJ; Rowbottom CG; Mackay RI
    Radiother Oncol; 2009 Dec; 93(3):553-8. PubMed ID: 19897267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Single-energy metal artefact reduction with CT for carbon-ion radiation therapy treatment planning.
    Miki K; Mori S; Hasegawa A; Naganawa K; Koto M
    Br J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 89(1062):20150988. PubMed ID: 26942839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy vs. conventional IMRT in head-and-neck cancer: a comparative planning and dosimetric study.
    Verbakel WF; Cuijpers JP; Hoffmans D; Bieker M; Slotman BJ; Senan S
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 May; 74(1):252-9. PubMed ID: 19362244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improvement of dose calculation in radiation therapy due to metal artifact correction using the augmented likelihood image reconstruction.
    Ziemann C; Stille M; Cremers F; Buzug TM; Rades D
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 May; 19(3):227-233. PubMed ID: 29664225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Importance of protocol target definition on the ability to spare normal tissue: an IMRT and 3D-CRT planning comparison for intraorbital tumors.
    Hein PA; Gladstone DJ; Bellerive MR; Hug EB
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Aug; 62(5):1540-8. PubMed ID: 16029816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Delineation of the primary tumour Clinical Target Volumes (CTV-P) in laryngeal, hypopharyngeal, oropharyngeal and oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: AIRO, CACA, DAHANCA, EORTC, GEORCC, GORTEC, HKNPCSG, HNCIG, IAG-KHT, LPRHHT, NCIC CTG, NCRI, NRG Oncology, PHNS, SBRT, SOMERA, SRO, SSHNO, TROG consensus guidelines.
    Grégoire V; Evans M; Le QT; Bourhis J; Budach V; Chen A; Eisbruch A; Feng M; Giralt J; Gupta T; Hamoir M; Helito JK; Hu C; Hunter K; Johansen J; Kaanders J; Laskar SG; Lee A; Maingon P; Mäkitie A; Micciche' F; Nicolai P; O'Sullivan B; Poitevin A; Porceddu S; Składowski K; Tribius S; Waldron J; Wee J; Yao M; Yom SS; Zimmermann F; Grau C
    Radiother Oncol; 2018 Jan; 126(1):3-24. PubMed ID: 29180076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. MRI-based computed tomography metal artifact correction method for improving proton range calculation accuracy.
    Park PC; Schreibmann E; Roper J; Elder E; Crocker I; Fox T; Zhu XR; Dong L; Dhabaan A
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Mar; 91(4):849-56. PubMed ID: 25752400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Obtaining normal tissue constraints using intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in patients with oral cavity, oropharyngeal, and laryngeal carcinoma.
    Skinner WK; Muse ED; Yaparpalvi R; Guha C; Garg MK; Kalnicki S
    Med Dosim; 2009; 34(4):279-84. PubMed ID: 19854386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pencil beam scanning proton therapy vs rotational arc radiation therapy: A treatment planning comparison for postoperative oropharyngeal cancer.
    Apinorasethkul O; Kirk M; Teo K; Swisher-McClure S; Lukens JN; Lin A
    Med Dosim; 2017 Spring; 42(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 27839693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.