1959 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26419845)
21. Randomized Trial Comparing the Flexible 19G and 25G Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration of Solid Pancreatic Mass Lesions.
Ramesh J; Bang JY; Hebert-Magee S; Trevino J; Eltoum I; Frost A; Hasan MK; Logue A; Hawes R; Varadarajulu S
Pancreas; 2015 Jan; 44(1):128-33. PubMed ID: 25232713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Touch imprint cytology on endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy provides comparable sample quality and diagnostic yield to standard endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration specimens in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions.
Crinò SF; Larghi A; Bernardoni L; Parisi A; Frulloni L; Gabbrielli A; Parcesepe P; Scarpa A; Manfrin E
Cytopathology; 2019 Mar; 30(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 30484917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Prospective comparative study of the EUS guided 25-gauge FNA needle with the 19-gauge Trucut needle and 22-gauge FNA needle in patients with solid pancreatic masses.
Sakamoto H; Kitano M; Komaki T; Noda K; Chikugo T; Dote K; Takeyama Y; Das K; Yamao K; Kudo M
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2009 Mar; 24(3):384-90. PubMed ID: 19032453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Does ProCore Fine-Needle Biopsy Really Improve the Clinical Outcome of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Sampling of Pancreatic Masses?
Delconte G; Cavalcoli F; Magarotto A; Centonze G; Bezzio C; Cattaneo L; Rausa E; Kelly ME; Bonitta G; Milione M; Enzo M
Dig Dis; 2022; 40(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 33780932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. 22-gauge core
Sterlacci W; Sioulas AD; Veits L; Gönüllü P; Schachschal G; Groth S; Anders M; Kontos CK; Topalidis T; Hinsch A; Vieth M; Rösch T; Denzer UW
World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Oct; 22(39):8820-8830. PubMed ID: 27818598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. EUS-guided reverse bevel fine-needle biopsy sampling and open tip fine-needle aspiration in solid pancreatic lesions - a prospective, comparative study.
Hedenström P; Demir A; Khodakaram K; Nilsson O; Sadik R
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Feb; 53(2):231-237. PubMed ID: 29301477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of 2 core biopsy needles for EUS-guided tissue acquisition from solid pancreatic lesions.
Nayar MK; Paranandi B; Dawwas MF; Leeds JS; Darne A; Haugk B; Majumdar D; Ahmed MM; Oppong KW
Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 May; 85(5):1017-1024. PubMed ID: 27633157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of 22G reverse-beveled versus standard needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic lesions.
Alatawi A; Beuvon F; Grabar S; Leblanc S; Chaussade S; Terris B; Barret M; Prat F
United European Gastroenterol J; 2015 Aug; 3(4):343-52. PubMed ID: 26279842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A comparison of the efficiency of 22G versus 25G needles in EUS-FNA for solid pancreatic mass assessment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Guedes HG; Moura DTH; Duarte RB; Cordero MAC; Santos MELD; Cheng S; Matuguma SE; Chaves DM; Bernardo WM; Moura EGH
Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2018; 73():e261. PubMed ID: 29451621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Feasibility and efficiency of a new 22G core needle: a prospective comparison study.
Hucl T; Wee E; Anuradha S; Gupta R; Ramchandani M; Rakesh K; Shrestha R; Reddy DN; Lakhtakia S
Endoscopy; 2013 Oct; 45(10):792-8. PubMed ID: 24068588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of Newly Designed 21-Gauge and Standard 22-Gauge Aspiration Needles in Patients with Solid Pancreatic Masses.
Minaga K; Yoshikawa T; Yamashita Y; Akamatsu H; Ikenouchi M; Ishii T; Matsumoto H; Iwagami H; Nakatani Y; Hatamaru K; Takenaka M; Akamatsu T; Uenoyama Y; Watanabe T; Ono K; Chiba Y; Kudo M
Dig Dis Sci; 2019 Oct; 64(10):2982-2991. PubMed ID: 31011943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The 25-gauge EUS-FNA needle: Good for on-site but poor for off-site evaluation? Results of a randomized trial.
Varadarajulu S; Bang JY; Holt BA; Hasan MK; Logue A; Hawes RH; Hebert-Magee S
Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Dec; 80(6):1056-63. PubMed ID: 24973173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Core needle versus standard needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized crossover study.
Vanbiervliet G; Napoléon B; Saint Paul MC; Sakarovitch C; Wangermez M; Bichard P; Subtil C; Koch S; Grandval P; Gincul R; Karsenti D; Heyries L; Duchmann JC; Bourgaux JF; Levy M; Calament G; Fumex F; Pujol B; Lefort C; Poincloux L; Pagenault M; Bonin EA; Fabre M; Barthet M
Endoscopy; 2014 Dec; 46(12):1063-70. PubMed ID: 25098612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Randomized trial comparing the 25G and 22G Franseen needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition from solid pancreatic masses for adequate histological assessment.
Tomoda T; Kato H; Fujii Y; Yamazaki T; Matsumoto K; Horiguchi S; Tsutsumi K; Inoue H; Tanaka T; Mitsuhashi T; Okada H
Dig Endosc; 2022 Mar; 34(3):596-603. PubMed ID: 34245614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided FNA and ProCore biopsy in sampling pancreatic and intra-abdominal masses.
Dwyer J; Pantanowitz L; Ohori NP; Pai RK; Vrbin C; Brand RE; Monaco SE
Cancer Cytopathol; 2016 Feb; 124(2):110-21. PubMed ID: 26430767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine needle biopsy (FNB) in the diagnosis of solid lesions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Wang J; Wu X; Yin P; Guo Q; Hou W; Li Y; Wang Y; Cheng B
Trials; 2016 Apr; 17():198. PubMed ID: 27071386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. 22G versus 25G biopsy needles for EUS-guided tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized controlled study.
Woo YS; Lee KH; Noh DH; Park JK; Lee KT; Lee JK; Jang KT
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2017 Dec; 52(12):1435-1441. PubMed ID: 28893106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. IS THE NEW PROCORE 20G DOUBLE FORWARD-BEVEL NEEDLE CAPABLE TO OBTAIN BETTER HISTOLOGICAL SAMPLES BY ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND FOR DIAGNOSING SOLID PANCREATIC LESIONS?
Ardengh JC; Brunaldi VO; Brunaldi MO; Gaspar AF; Lopes-JÚnior JR; Sankarankutty AK; Kemp R; Santos JSD
Arq Bras Cir Dig; 2021; 33(4):e1554. PubMed ID: 33503114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of 19G FNA Versus 22G FNB Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Sampling of Subepithelial Tumors: Is Bigger Better?
Li J; Feng J; Gao S; Wang W; Huang L; Yi S; Xu H; Ding XW
J Ultrasound Med; 2024 Apr; 43(4):761-770. PubMed ID: 38167820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Prospective evaluation of the optimal number of 25-gauge needle passes for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of solid pancreatic lesions in the absence of an onsite cytopathologist.
Suzuki R; Irisawa A; Bhutani MS; Hikichi T; Takagi T; Sato A; Sato M; Ikeda T; Watanabe K; Nakamura J; Tasaki K; Obara K; Ohira H
Dig Endosc; 2012 Nov; 24(6):452-6. PubMed ID: 23078439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
