1940 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26419845)
41. Diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition by EUS-FNA versus EUS-FNB for solid pancreatic mass without ROSE: a retrospective study.
Wong T; Pattarapuntakul T; Netinatsunton N; Ovartlarnporn B; Sottisuporn J; Chamroonkul N; Sripongpun P; Jandee S; Kaewdech A; Attasaranya S; Piratvisuth T
World J Surg Oncol; 2022 Jun; 20(1):215. PubMed ID: 35751053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. A Comparative Study of the Diagnostic Utility of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (EUS-FNA) versus Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy (EUS-FNB) in Pancreatic and Non-Pancreatic Lesions.
Yousri M; Abusinna E; Tahoun N; Okasha HH; El-Habashi AH
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2022 Jun; 23(6):2151-2158. PubMed ID: 35763660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Slow-pull and different conventional suction techniques in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic solid lesions using 22-gauge needles.
Chen JY; Ding QY; Lv Y; Guo W; Zhi FC; Liu SD; Cheng TM
World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Oct; 22(39):8790-8797. PubMed ID: 27818594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Slow pull versus suction in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic solid masses.
Nakai Y; Isayama H; Chang KJ; Yamamoto N; Hamada T; Uchino R; Mizuno S; Miyabayashi K; Yamamoto K; Kawakubo K; Kogure H; Sasaki T; Hirano K; Tanaka M; Tada M; Fukayama M; Koike K
Dig Dis Sci; 2014 Jul; 59(7):1578-85. PubMed ID: 24429514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Dry suction versus wet suction technique of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy for diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions: study protocol of a multicenter randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.
Xu S; Wang J; Guo J; Xie F; Qiao W; Meng Y; Peng P; Hu H; Huang Y; Liu S; Qin M; Yao J; Li Y
Trials; 2023 Dec; 24(1):805. PubMed ID: 38093381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy histology with a 22-gauge Franseen needle and fine-needle aspiration liquid-based cytology with a conventional 25-gauge needle provide comparable diagnostic accuracy in solid pancreatic lesions.
Tomita Y; Torisu Y; Chiba M; Kinoshita Y; Akasu T; Shimamoto N; Abe T; Kanazawa K; Takakura K; Tsukinaga S; Nakano M; Toyoizumi H; Kato M; Saruta M
JGH Open; 2021 Sep; 5(9):1092-1096. PubMed ID: 34584980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Comparison of FNA and fine-needle biopsy for EUS-guided sampling of suspected GI stromal tumors.
El Chafic AH; Loren D; Siddiqui A; Mounzer R; Cosgrove N; Kowalski T
Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Sep; 86(3):510-515. PubMed ID: 28131864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Diagnostic ability of EUS-FNA for pancreatic solid lesions with conventional 22-gauge needle using the slow pull technique: a prospective study.
Kin T; Katanuma A; Yane K; Takahashi K; Osanai M; Takaki R; Matsumoto K; Gon K; Matsumori T; Tomonari A; Maguchi H; Shinohara T; Nojima M
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2015 Jul; 50(7):900-7. PubMed ID: 25732902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Endoscopic ultrasound with combined fine needle aspiration plus biopsy improves diagnostic yield in solid pancreatic masses.
Gonzalez A; Wadhwa V; Singh H; Khan S; Gupta K; Liang H; Hussain I; Vargo J; Jang S; Chahal P; Bhatt A; Siddiki H; Erim T; Sanaka MR
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2022 May; 57(5):610-617. PubMed ID: 34991430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Stylet slow-pull vs. standard suction technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy in pancreatic solid lesions using 20 Gauge Procore™ needle: A multicenter randomized trial.
Di Mitri R; Mocciaro F; Antonini F; Scimeca D; Conte E; Bonaccorso A; Scibetta N; Unti E; Fornelli A; Giorgini S; Binda C; Macarri G; Larghi A; Fabbri C
Dig Liver Dis; 2020 Feb; 52(2):178-184. PubMed ID: 31601535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The prospective randomized, controlled trial of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration using 22G and 19G aspiration needles for solid pancreatic or peripancreatic masses.
Song TJ; Kim JH; Lee SS; Eum JB; Moon SH; Park DY; Seo DW; Lee SK; Jang SJ; Yun SC; Kim MH
Am J Gastroenterol; 2010 Aug; 105(8):1739-45. PubMed ID: 20216532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Optimizing EUS-guided liver biopsy sampling: comprehensive assessment of needle types and tissue acquisition techniques.
Schulman AR; Thompson CC; Odze R; Chan WW; Ryou M
Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Feb; 85(2):419-426. PubMed ID: 27530070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy versus fine-needle aspiration for genomic profiling and DNA yield in pancreatic cancer: a randomized crossover trial.
Kandel P; Nassar A; Gomez V; Raimondo M; Woodward TA; Crook JE; Fares NS; Wallace MB
Endoscopy; 2021 Apr; 53(4):376-382. PubMed ID: 32767288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Performance of a new histology needle for EUS-guided fine needle biopsy: A retrospective multicenter study.
Attili F; Rimbaş M; Fantin A; Fabbri C; Carrara S; Di Maurizio L; Gibiino G; Repici A; Inzani F; Gasbarrini A; Costamagna G; Larghi A
Dig Liver Dis; 2018 May; 50(5):469-474. PubMed ID: 29477347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition by 22-Gauge Franseen and Standard Needles for Solid Pancreatic Lesions.
Ishigaki K; Nakai Y; Oyama H; Kanai S; Suzuki T; Nakamura T; Sato T; Hakuta R; Saito K; Saito T; Takahara N; Hamada T; Mizuno S; Kogure H; Tada M; Isayama H; Koike K
Gut Liver; 2020 Nov; 14(6):817-825. PubMed ID: 32457276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. The yield of cytology and histology obtained by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and biopsy needles in the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Sbeit W; Abu Hanna N; Alejandro L; Khoury T
Cytopathology; 2024 Jan; 35(1):92-97. PubMed ID: 37698128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Needle size has only a limited effect on outcomes in EUS-guided fine needle aspiration: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Affolter KE; Schmidt RL; Matynia AP; Adler DG; Factor RE
Dig Dis Sci; 2013 Apr; 58(4):1026-34. PubMed ID: 23086117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Effect of a stylet on a histological specimen in EUS-guided fine-needle tissue acquisition by using 22-gauge needles: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
Abe Y; Kawakami H; Oba K; Hayashi T; Yasuda I; Mukai T; Isayama H; Ishiwatari H; Doi S; Nakashima M; Yamamoto N; Kuwatani M; Mitsuhashi T; Hasegawa T; Hirose Y; Yamada T; Tanaka M; Sakamoto N;
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Nov; 82(5):837-844.e1. PubMed ID: 25936452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Comparison of tissue and molecular yield between fine-needle biopsy (FNB) and fine-needle aspiration (FNA): a randomized study.
Asokkumar R; Yung Ka C; Loh T; Kah Ling L; Gek San T; Ying H; Tan D; Khor C; Lim T; Soetikno R
Endosc Int Open; 2019 Aug; 7(8):E955-E963. PubMed ID: 31367675
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. A pilot study of EUS-guided through-the-needle forceps biopsy (with video).
Nakai Y; Isayama H; Chang KJ; Yamamoto N; Mizuno S; Mohri D; Kogure H; Matsubara S; Tada M; Koike K
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jul; 84(1):158-62. PubMed ID: 26772889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
