125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26420769)
1. Preference pulses and the win-stay, fix-and-sample model of choice.
Hachiga Y; Sakagami T; Silberberg A
J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Nov; 104(3):274-95. PubMed ID: 26420769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preference pulses induced by reinforcement.
Hachiga Y; Sakagami T; Silberberg A
J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 Nov; 102(3):335-45. PubMed ID: 25270509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fix and sample with rats in the dynamics of choice.
Aparicio CF; Baum WM
J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Jul; 86(1):43-63. PubMed ID: 16903492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Local preference in concurrent schedules: the effects of reinforcer sequences.
Krägeloh CU; Davison M; Elliffe DM
J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Jul; 84(1):37-64. PubMed ID: 16156136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Running and responding reinforced by the opportunity to run: effect of reinforcer duration.
Belke TW
J Exp Anal Behav; 1997 May; 67(3):337-51. PubMed ID: 9163938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Concurrent schedules: short- and long-term effects of reinforcers.
Landon J; Davison M; Elliffe D
J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 May; 77(3):257-71. PubMed ID: 12083679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Gestational exposure to methylmercury retards choice in transition in aging rats.
Newland MC; Reile PA; Langston JL
Neurotoxicol Teratol; 2004; 26(2):179-94. PubMed ID: 15019952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Choice between delayed reinforcers in an adjusting-delay schedule: the effects of absolute reinforcer size and deprivation level.
Wogar MA; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E
Q J Exp Psychol B; 1992 Jul; 45(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 1496135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quinine pellets as an inferior good and a Giffen good in rats.
Hastjarjo T; Silberberg A; Hursh SR
J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 Mar; 53(2):263-71. PubMed ID: 2324666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Response rate viewed as engagement bouts: resistance to extinction.
Shull RL; Gaynor ST; Grimes JA
J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 May; 77(3):211-31. PubMed ID: 12083677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Arousal, changeover responses, and preference in concurrent schedules.
McDevitt MA; Williams BA
J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Nov; 80(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 14964707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How do reinforcers affect choice? Preference pulses after responses and reinforcers.
Gomes-Ng S; Elliffe D; Cowie S
J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Jul; 108(1):17-38. PubMed ID: 28573713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of reinforcement schedules on rats' choice behavior in extinction.
Huang IN; Krukar JD; Miles SP
J Gen Psychol; 1992 Apr; 119(2):201-11. PubMed ID: 1506847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preference pulses without reinforcers.
McLean AP; Grace RC; Pitts RC; Hughes CE
J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 May; 101(3):317-36. PubMed ID: 24676669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dynamical concurrent schedules.
Palya WL; Allan RW
J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Jan; 79(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 12696738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sensitivity to pre- and post-reinforcer delays in self-control choice.
Yamaguchi T; Saeki D; Ito M
Behav Processes; 2015 Dec; 121():8-12. PubMed ID: 26456039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of orbital prefrontal cortex lesions on performance on a progressive ratio schedule: implications for models of inter-temporal choice.
Kheramin S; Body S; Herrera FM; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E; Deakin JF; Anderson IM
Behav Brain Res; 2005 Jan; 156(1):145-52. PubMed ID: 15474659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The general matching law describes choice on concurrent variable-interval schedules of wheel-running reinforcement.
Belke TW; Belliveau J
J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 May; 75(3):299-310. PubMed ID: 11453620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A runs-test algorithm: contingent reinforcement and response run structures.
Hachiga Y; Sakagami T
J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 Jan; 93(1):61-80. PubMed ID: 20676268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Inter-response-time reinforcement and relative reinforcer frequency control choice.
Tanno T; Silberberg A
Learn Behav; 2015 Mar; 43(1):54-71. PubMed ID: 25515591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
