These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26420769)

  • 41. Concurrent VR VI schedules: primacy of molar control of preference and molecular control of response rates.
    Tanno T; Silberberg A; Sakagami T
    Learn Behav; 2010 Nov; 38(4):382-93. PubMed ID: 21048229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Basolateral amygdala lesions and sensitivity to reinforcer magnitude in concurrent chains schedules.
    Helms CM; Mitchell SH
    Behav Brain Res; 2008 Aug; 191(2):210-8. PubMed ID: 18455812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Dynamics of choice: relative rate and amount affect local preference at three different time scales.
    Aparicio CF; Baum WM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2009 May; 91(3):293-317. PubMed ID: 19949489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Choice between delayed reinforcers in a discrete-trials schedule: the effect of deprivation level.
    Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1992 Jan; 44(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 1546183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Choice between constant and variable alternatives by rats: effects of different reinforcer amounts and energy budgets.
    Ito M; Takatsuru S; Saeki D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 Jan; 73(1):79-92. PubMed ID: 10682341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Sensitivity, changeover responses, and choice in transition.
    Jiménez AA; Aparicio CF
    Behav Processes; 2009 Sep; 82(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 19615608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Body weight and response acquisition with delayed reinforcement.
    Lattal KA; Williams AM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1997 Jan; 67(1):131-43. PubMed ID: 9037784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Observing responses and serial stimuli: searching for the reinforcing properties of the S-.
    Escobar R; Bruner CA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2009 Sep; 92(2):215-31. PubMed ID: 20354600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Differential changes in sucrose/ethanol and sucrose maintained responding by independently altering ethanol or sucrose concentration.
    Slawecki CJ; Samson HH; Hodge CW
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 1997 Apr; 21(2):250-60. PubMed ID: 9113261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effects of reinforcer magnitude on response acquisition with unsignaled delayed reinforcement.
    Doughty AH; Galuska CM; Dawson AE; Brierley KP
    Behav Processes; 2012 Jun; 90(2):287-90. PubMed ID: 22407257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Effect of contingent auditory stimuli on concurrent schedule performance: an alternative punisher to electric shock.
    Reed P; Yoshino T
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jul; 78(3):421-8. PubMed ID: 18406078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Concurrent schedules: discriminating reinforcer-ratio reversals at a fixed time after the previous reinforcer.
    Cowie S; Elliffe D; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2013 Sep; 100(2):117-34. PubMed ID: 23943395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Acquisition of operant behavior in rats with delayed reinforcement: A retractable-lever procedure.
    McNamara AA; Johnson LE; Tate C; Chiang T; Byrne T
    Behav Processes; 2015 Feb; 111():37-41. PubMed ID: 25464338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Choice as a function of local versus molar reinforcement contingencies.
    Williams BA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Nov; 56(3):455-73. PubMed ID: 1774539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Bidirectional instrumental conditioning.
    Dickinson A; Campos J; Varga ZI; Balleine B
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1996 Nov; 49(4):289-306. PubMed ID: 8962537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Instrumental performance following a shift in primary motivation depends on incentive learning.
    Balleine B
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1992 Jul; 18(3):236-50. PubMed ID: 1619392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Aggression as a reinforcer: operant behavor in the mouse-killing rat.
    Van Hemel PE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1972 Mar; 17(2):237-45. PubMed ID: 5062954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. An alternative to the stay/switch equation assessed when using a changeover-delay.
    MacDonall JS
    Behav Processes; 2015 Nov; 120():40-9. PubMed ID: 26299548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Response acquisition with fixed and variable resetting delays of reinforcement in male and female Wistar rats.
    van Haaren F
    Physiol Behav; 1992 Oct; 52(4):767-72. PubMed ID: 1409951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Comparison of progressive hold and progressive response schedules of reinforcement.
    Alvarez-Sekely CS; Toscano-Zapien AL; Salles-Ize P; Zepeda-Ruiz WA; Lopez-Guzman MA; Velazquez-Martinez DN
    Behav Processes; 2023 Feb; 205():104822. PubMed ID: 36669746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.