149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26420847)
1. A retrospective evaluation of the intrauterine device in a patient population in Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Jagroep SR; Pichardo MS; Arribas L; Heredia G; Coccio E; Palermo TM
J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2016 Apr; 42(2):88-92. PubMed ID: 26420847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception.
Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun; 18(101):125-30. PubMed ID: 19637436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Implanon users are less likely to be satisfied with their contraception after 6 months than IUD users.
Wong RC; Bell RJ; Thunuguntla K; McNamee K; Vollenhoven B
Contraception; 2009 Nov; 80(5):452-6. PubMed ID: 19835719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Six-month and 1-year continuation rates following postpartum insertion of implants and intrauterine devices.
Woo I; Seifert S; Hendricks D; Jamshidi RM; Burke AE; Fox MC
Contraception; 2015 Dec; 92(6):532-5. PubMed ID: 26408376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adolescent experience with intrauterine device insertion and use: a retrospective cohort study.
Bayer LL; Jensen JT; Li H; Nichols MD; Bednarek PH
Contraception; 2012 Nov; 86(5):443-51. PubMed ID: 22560185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predictors of Discontinuation of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Before 30 Months of Use by Adolescents and Young Women.
Cohen R; Sheeder J; Teal SB
J Adolesc Health; 2019 Aug; 65(2):295-302. PubMed ID: 31196778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. IUDs at 1 year: predictors of early discontinuation.
Maguire K; Joslin-Roher S; Westhoff CL; Davis AR
Contraception; 2015 Dec; 92(6):575-7. PubMed ID: 26365791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Temporal trends of copper-bearing intrauterine device discontinuation: a population-based birth-cohort study of contraceptive use among rural married women in China.
Zhou J; Tan X; Song X; Zhang K; Fang J; Peng L; Qi W; Nie Z; Li M; Deng R; Yan C
Asia Pac J Public Health; 2015 Mar; 27(2):NP2433-42. PubMed ID: 24408865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intrauterine devices at six months: does patient age matter? Results from an urban family medicine federally qualified health center (FQHC) network.
Ravi A; Prine L; Waltermaurer E; Miller N; Rubin SE
J Am Board Fam Med; 2014; 27(6):822-30. PubMed ID: 25381080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Menstrual characteristics and ultrasonographic uterine cavity measurements predict bleeding and pain in nulligravid women using intrauterine contraception.
Kaislasuo J; Heikinheimo O; Lähteenmäki P; Suhonen S
Hum Reprod; 2015 Jul; 30(7):1580-8. PubMed ID: 25990577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Satisfaction, early removal, and side effects associated with long-acting reversible contraception.
Dickerson LM; Diaz VA; Jordon J; Davis E; Chirina S; Goddard JA; Carr KB; Carek PJ
Fam Med; 2013; 45(10):701-7. PubMed ID: 24347187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Insertion characteristics of intrauterine devices in adolescents and young women: success, ancillary measures, and complications.
Teal SB; Romer SE; Goldthwaite LM; Peters MG; Kaplan DW; Sheeder J
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Oct; 213(4):515.e1-5. PubMed ID: 26116873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The acceptability of using IUDs among Egyptian nulliparous women: a cross-sectional study.
Elkhateeb RR; Kishk E; Sanad A; Bahaa H; Hagazy AR; Shaheen K; Moustafa E; Fares H; Gomaa K; Mahran A
BMC Womens Health; 2020 Jun; 20(1):117. PubMed ID: 32503576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Urban Adolescents' and Young Adults' Decision-Making Process around Selection of Intrauterine Contraception.
Rubin SE; Felsher M; Korich F; Jacobs AM
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol; 2016 Jun; 29(3):234-9. PubMed ID: 26363309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Dedicated Postpartum Intrauterine Device Inserter: Pilot Experience and Proof of Concept.
Singh S; Das V; Agarwal A; Dewan R; Mittal P; Bhamrah R; Lerma K; Blumenthal PD
Glob Health Sci Pract; 2016 Mar; 4(1):132-40. PubMed ID: 27016549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A randomized clinical trial of the effect of intensive versus non-intensive counselling on discontinuation rates due to bleeding disturbances of three long-acting reversible contraceptives.
Modesto W; Bahamondes MV; Bahamondes L
Hum Reprod; 2014 Jul; 29(7):1393-9. PubMed ID: 24812309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. IUD use in adolescent mothers: retention, failure and reasons for discontinuation.
Teal SB; Sheeder J
Contraception; 2012 Mar; 85(3):270-4. PubMed ID: 22067773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimated disability-adjusted life years averted by long-term provision of long acting contraceptive methods in a Brazilian clinic.
Bahamondes L; Bottura BF; Bahamondes MV; Gonçalves MP; Correia VM; Espejo-Arce X; Sousa MH; Monteiro I; Fernandes A
Hum Reprod; 2014 Oct; 29(10):2163-70. PubMed ID: 25085802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Characteristics of users of intrauterine devices and other reversible contraceptive methods in the United States.
Xu X; Macaluso M; Frost J; Anderson JE; Curtis K; Grosse SD
Fertil Steril; 2011 Nov; 96(5):1138-44. PubMed ID: 21917255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of the copper intrauterine device versus injectable progestin contraception on pregnancy rates and method discontinuation among women attending termination of pregnancy services in South Africa: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.
Hofmeyr GJ; Singata-Madliki M; Lawrie TA; Bergel E; Temmerman M
Reprod Health; 2016 Apr; 13():42. PubMed ID: 27091008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
