These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26420847)

  • 41. TCu 380A IUD: a reversible permanent contraceptive method in women over 35 years of age.
    Bahamondes L; Faundes A; Sobreira-Lima B; Lui-Filho JF; Pecci P; Matera S
    Contraception; 2005 Nov; 72(5):337-41. PubMed ID: 16246658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. IUD use effectiveness in an urban Guatemalan clinic.
    Prior P; Seward PN; Staackman F; Galich LF; Burski C; Morris L
    Bull Pan Am Health Organ; 1977; 11(2):117-24. PubMed ID: 901967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Comparative study of safety and efficacy of IUD insertions by physicians and nursing personnel in Brazil.
    Lassner KJ; Chen CH; Kropsch LA; Oberle MW; Lopes IM; Morris L
    Bull Pan Am Health Organ; 1995 Sep; 29(3):206-15. PubMed ID: 8520606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Contraception with intrauterine devices.
    Parr EL
    Bioscience; 1973 May; 23(5):281-6. PubMed ID: 4803454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Intrauterine contraceptive devices. Mode of action, experiences, complications (author's transl)].
    Ludwig H
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1976 Feb; 36(2):97-108. PubMed ID: 943359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Lidocaine 10% spray to the cervix reduces pain during intrauterine device insertion: a double-blind randomised controlled trial.
    Aksoy H; Aksoy Ü; Ozyurt S; Açmaz G; Babayigit M
    J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2016 Apr; 42(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 25759418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The IUD: dispelling the myths and assessing the potential.
    Mishell Dr ; Sulak PJ
    Dialogues Contracept; 1997; 5(2):1-4. PubMed ID: 12292543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparison of copper intrauterine device with levonorgestrel-bearing intrauterine system for post-abortion contraception.
    Bilgehan F; Dilbaz B; Karadag B; Deveci CD
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2015 Sep; 41(9):1426-32. PubMed ID: 26180028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Adolescent Experiences With Intrauterine Devices: A Qualitative Study.
    Schmidt EO; James A; Curran KM; Peipert JF; Madden T
    J Adolesc Health; 2015 Oct; 57(4):381-6. PubMed ID: 26126950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Use of ultrasound in predicting success of intrauterine contraceptive device insertion immediately after delivery.
    Dias T; Abeykoon S; Kumarasiri S; Gunawardena C; Padeniya T; D'Antonio F
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jul; 46(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 25418016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Intrauterine devices in general practice: a prospective study of 300 insertions].
    Marret H; Golfier F; Vollerin F; Legoaziou MF; Raudrant D
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2002 Sep; 31(5):465-70. PubMed ID: 12379830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Barriers to intrauterine device insertion in postpartum women.
    Ogburn JA; Espey E; Stonehocker J
    Contraception; 2005 Dec; 72(6):426-9. PubMed ID: 16307964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Postabortion Initiation of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception by Adolescent and Nulliparous Women in New Zealand.
    Rose SB; Garrett SM
    J Adolesc Health; 2016 Feb; 58(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 26603946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Intrauterine device insertions: which variables matter?
    Brown WM; Trouton K
    J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2014 Apr; 40(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 23771917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. IUD services among primary care practices in New York City.
    Jacobson L; Garbers S; Helmy H; Roobol H; Kohn JE; Kavanaugh ML
    Contraception; 2016 Mar; 93(3):257-62. PubMed ID: 26569447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. IUDs as EC? Limited awareness and high reported acceptability: evidence from Argentina.
    Pichardo M; Arribas L; Coccio E; Heredia G; Jagroep S; Palermo T
    Contraception; 2014 Nov; 90(5):522-8. PubMed ID: 24973905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 3 of 4): Chapter 7--Intrauterine Contraception.
    Black A; Guilbert E; Costescu D; Dunn S; Fisher W; Kives S; Mirosh M; Norman W; Pymar H; Reid R; Roy G; Varto H; Waddington A; Wagner MS; Whelan AM; Mansouri S
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2016 Feb; 38(2):182-222. PubMed ID: 27032746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Social and medical factors in the use and effectiveness of IUDs.
    Snowden R; Eckstein P; Hawkins D
    Fam Plann Resume; 1977; 1(1):200-1. PubMed ID: 12308792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Postplacental insertion of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device after cesarean delivery vs. delayed insertion: a randomized controlled trial.
    Whitaker AK; Endres LK; Mistretta SQ; Gilliam ML
    Contraception; 2014 Jun; 89(6):534-9. PubMed ID: 24457061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Intrauterine devices. The optimal long-term contraceptive method?
    Fortney JA; Feldblum PJ; Raymond EG
    J Reprod Med; 1999 Mar; 44(3):269-74. PubMed ID: 10202746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.