These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26421450)

  • 21. The neural effect of stimulus-response modality compatibility on dual-task performance: an fMRI study.
    Stelzel C; Schumacher EH; Schubert T; D'Esposito M
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):514-25. PubMed ID: 16175414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Alternating between pro- and antisaccades: switch-costs manifest via decoupling the spatial relations between stimulus and response.
    Heath M; Gillen C; Samani A
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Mar; 234(3):853-65. PubMed ID: 26661337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. How conceptual overlap and modality pairings affect task-switching and mixing costs.
    Schacherer J; Hazeltine E
    Psychol Res; 2019 Jul; 83(5):1020-1032. PubMed ID: 29043435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Dual-task automatization: The key role of sensory-motor modality compatibility.
    Maquestiaux F; Ruthruff E; Defer A; Ibrahime S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Apr; 80(3):752-772. PubMed ID: 29285603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cue the effects: Stimulus-action effect modality compatibility and dual-task costs.
    Schacherer J; Hazeltine E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Apr; 46(4):350-368. PubMed ID: 32223289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Backward crosstalk and the role of dimensional overlap within and between tasks.
    Huestegge L; Pieczykolan A; Janczyk M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Jul; 188():139-147. PubMed ID: 29933176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Preparing auditory task switching in a task with overlapping and non-overlapping response sets.
    Nolden S; Koch I
    Psychol Res; 2023 Oct; 87(7):2228-2237. PubMed ID: 36790482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Exploring cross-task compatibility in perceiving and producing facial expressions using electromyography.
    Otte E; Jost K; Habel U; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):187-92. PubMed ID: 21737052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Modality and task switching interactions using bi-modal and bivalent stimuli.
    Sandhu R; Dyson BJ
    Brain Cogn; 2013 Jun; 82(1):90-9. PubMed ID: 23524240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The impact of stimulus modality on the processing of conflicting sensory information during response inhibition.
    Friedrich J; Beste C
    Neuroscience; 2019 Jul; 410():191-201. PubMed ID: 31100340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The role of preparation and cue-modality in crossmodal task switching.
    Lukas S; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 20398881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of Input Modality on Vocal Effector Prioritization in Manual-Vocal Dual Tasks.
    Hoffmann MA; Westermann M; Pieczykolan A; Huestegge L
    Exp Psychol; 2020 Jan; 67(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 32520669
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Improved intertask coordination after extensive dual-task practice.
    Liepelt R; Strobach T; Frensch P; Schubert T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jul; 64(7):1251-72. PubMed ID: 21462091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dual-task crosstalk between saccades and manual responses.
    Huestegge L; Koch I
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Apr; 35(2):352-62. PubMed ID: 19331493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of directional compatibility on the response latencies of ocular and manual movements.
    Niechwiej-Szwedo E; McIlroy WE; Green R; Verrier MC
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Apr; 162(2):220-9. PubMed ID: 15599726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. BOLD responses to tactile stimuli in visual and auditory cortex depend on the frequency content of stimulation.
    Nordmark PF; Pruszynski JA; Johansson RS
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Oct; 24(10):2120-34. PubMed ID: 22721377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Auditory versus visual spatial stimulus-response mappings in tracking and discrete dual task performance: implications for human-machine interface design.
    Tsang SNH; Chan AHS; Pan X; Man SS
    Ergonomics; 2021 Apr; 64(4):485-501. PubMed ID: 33103599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Validation of auditory detection response task method for assessing the attentional effects of cognitive load.
    Stojmenova K; Sodnik J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Jul; 19(5):495-500. PubMed ID: 29461865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cognitive control in number processing: new evidence from task switching.
    Schliephake A; Bahnmueller J; Willmes K; Moeller K
    Psychol Res; 2021 Oct; 85(7):2578-2587. PubMed ID: 32980895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Age-Related Interference between the Selection of Input-Output Modality Mappings and Postural Control-a Pilot Study.
    Stelzel C; Schauenburg G; Rapp MA; Heinzel S; Granacher U
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():613. PubMed ID: 28484411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.