BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

365 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26422409)

  • 1. Reassessing the Efficiency Penalty from Carbon Capture in Coal-Fired Power Plants.
    Supekar SD; Skerlos SJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Oct; 49(20):12576-84. PubMed ID: 26422409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sourcing of Steam and Electricity for Carbon Capture Retrofits.
    Supekar SD; Skerlos SJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Nov; 51(21):12908-12917. PubMed ID: 28968494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ultra-Low Carbon Emissions from Coal-Fired Power Plants through Bio-Oil Co-Firing and Biochar Sequestration.
    Dang Q; Mba Wright M; Brown RC
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Dec; 49(24):14688-95. PubMed ID: 26545153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Opportunities for Decarbonizing Existing U.S. Coal-Fired Power Plants via CO2 Capture, Utilization and Storage.
    Zhai H; Ou Y; Rubin ES
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 49(13):7571-9. PubMed ID: 26023722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Techno-Economic Assessment of Hybrid Cooling Systems for Coal- and Natural-Gas-Fired Power Plants with and without Carbon Capture and Storage.
    Zhai H; Rubin ES
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Apr; 50(7):4127-34. PubMed ID: 26967583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of the US EPA's determination of the role for CO2 capture and storage in new fossil fuel-fired power plants.
    Clark VR; Herzog HJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Jul; 48(14):7723-9. PubMed ID: 24960207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Water use at pulverized coal power plants with postcombustion carbon capture and storage.
    Zhai H; Rubin ES; Versteeg PL
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Mar; 45(6):2479-85. PubMed ID: 21329343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Are renewables portfolio standards cost-effective emission abatement policy?
    Dobesova K; Apt J; Lave LB
    Environ Sci Technol; 2005 Nov; 39(22):8578-83. PubMed ID: 16323750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Postcombustion Capture or Direct Air Capture in Decarbonizing US Natural Gas Power?
    Azarabadi H; Lackner KS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Apr; 54(8):5102-5111. PubMed ID: 32212696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Energy and exergy analyses of an integrated gasification combined cycle power plant with CO2 capture using hot potassium carbonate solvent.
    Li S; Jin H; Gao L; Mumford KA; Smith K; Stevens G
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Dec; 48(24):14814-21. PubMed ID: 25389800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implications of the recent reductions in natural gas prices for emissions of CO2 from the US power sector.
    Lu X; Salovaara J; McElroy MB
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Mar; 46(5):3014-21. PubMed ID: 22321206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Separation and capture of CO2 from large stationary sources and sequestration in geological formations--coalbeds and deep saline aquifers.
    White CM; Strazisar BR; Granite EJ; Hoffman JS; Pennline HW;
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2003 Jun; 53(6):645-715. PubMed ID: 12828330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Life Cycle Assessment Case Study of Coal-Fired Electricity Generation with Humidity Swing Direct Air Capture of CO
    van der Giesen C; Meinrenken CJ; Kleijn R; Sprecher B; Lackner KS; Kramer GJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Jan; 51(2):1024-1034. PubMed ID: 27935700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Viability of Carbon Capture and Sequestration Retrofits for Existing Coal-Fired Power Plants under an Emission Trading Scheme.
    Talati S; Zhai H; Morgan MG
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Dec; 50(23):12567-12574. PubMed ID: 27792308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Economic Merits of Flexible Carbon Capture and Sequestration as a Compliance Strategy with the Clean Power Plan.
    Craig MT; Jaramillo P; Zhai H; Klima K
    Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Feb; 51(3):1102-1109. PubMed ID: 28001378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost Analysis of Carbon Capture and Sequestration from U.S. Natural Gas-Fired Power Plants.
    Psarras P; He J; Pilorgé H; McQueen N; Jensen-Fellows A; Kian K; Wilcox J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2020 May; 54(10):6272-6280. PubMed ID: 32329614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The oxycoal process with cryogenic oxygen supply.
    Kather A; Scheffknecht G
    Naturwissenschaften; 2009 Sep; 96(9):993-1010. PubMed ID: 19495717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Water impacts of CO2 emission performance standards for fossil fuel-fired power plants.
    Talati S; Zhai H; Morgan MG
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Oct; 48(20):11769-76. PubMed ID: 25229670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Technical and Energy Performance of an Advanced, Aqueous Ammonia-Based CO2 Capture Technology for a 500 MW Coal-Fired Power Station.
    Li K; Yu H; Feron P; Tade M; Wardhaugh L
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Aug; 49(16):10243-52. PubMed ID: 26208135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A life cycle assessment of coal-fired thermal power plants with post-combustion control techniques: an India scenario.
    Malode S; Prakash R; Mohanta JC
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Aug; 30(39):90639-90655. PubMed ID: 37462868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.