204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26422668)
1. Optimized Sonographic Weight Estimation of Fetuses over 3500 g Using Biometry-Guided Formula Selection.
Balsyte D; Schäffer L; Zimmermann R; Kurmanavicius J; Burkhardt T
Ultraschall Med; 2017 Jan; 38(1):60-64. PubMed ID: 26422668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Prediction of birth weight by ultrasound in Turkish population. Which formula should be used in Turkey to estimate fetal weight?
Donma MM; Donma O; Sonmez S
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Dec; 31(12):1577-81. PubMed ID: 16344119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. New sonographic method for fetuses with a large abdominal circumference improves fetal weight estimation.
Kehl S; Körber C; Hart N; Goecke TW; Schild RL; Siemer J
Ultraschall Med; 2012 Jun; 33(3):265-9. PubMed ID: 21080309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Finding the best formula to predict the fetal weight: comparison of 18 formulas.
Esinler D; Bircan O; Esin S; Sahin EG; Kandemir O; Yalvac S
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2015; 80(2):78-84. PubMed ID: 26183256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fetal weight estimation by 2D and 3D ultrasound: comparison of six formulas.
Hasenoehrl G; Pohlhammer A; Gruber R; Staudach A; Steiner H
Ultraschall Med; 2009 Dec; 30(6):585-90. PubMed ID: 19544232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-Versus Two-Dimensional Sonographic Biometry for Predicting Birth Weight and Macrosomia in Diabetic Pregnancies.
Tuuli MG; Kapalka K; Macones GA; Cahill AG
J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Sep; 35(9):1925-30. PubMed ID: 27466257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ultrasonographic Fetal Weight Estimation: Should Macrosomia-Specific Formulas Be Utilized?
Porter B; Neely C; Szychowski J; Owen J
Am J Perinatol; 2015 Aug; 32(10):968-72. PubMed ID: 25730134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Good accuracy of ultrasound estimations of fetal weight performed by midwives.
Mattsson N; Rosendahl H; Luukkaala T
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2007; 86(6):688-92. PubMed ID: 17520400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Weight estimation for low birth weight fetuses and macrosomic fetuses in Chinese population.
Chen P; Yu J; Li X; Wang Y; Chang C
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Sep; 284(3):599-606. PubMed ID: 21046133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How good is fetal weight estimation using volumetric methods?
Siemer J; Peter W; Zollver H; Hart N; Müller A; Meurer B; Goecke T; Schild RL
Ultraschall Med; 2008 Aug; 29(4):377-82. PubMed ID: 18484061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Macrosomia: a new formula for optimized fetal weight estimation.
Hart NC; Hilbert A; Meurer B; Schrauder M; Schmid M; Siemer J; Voigt M; Schild RL
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jan; 35(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 20034003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intrapartum sonographic weight estimation.
Faschingbauer F; Dammer U; Raabe E; Schneider M; Faschingbauer C; Schmid M; Schild RL; Beckmann MW; Kehl S; Mayr A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Oct; 292(4):805-11. PubMed ID: 25870017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ultrasonographic estimation of fetal weight: development of new model and assessment of performance of previous models.
Hammami A; Mazer Zumaeta A; Syngelaki A; Akolekar R; Nicolaides KH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jul; 52(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 29611251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sonographic weight estimation in fetal macrosomia: influence of the time interval between estimation and delivery.
Faschingbauer F; Dammer U; Raabe E; Schneider M; Faschingbauer C; Schmid M; Mayr A; Schild RL; Beckmann MW; Kehl S
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Jul; 292(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 25534163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. New sonographic method for fetuses with small abdominal circumference improves fetal weight estimation.
Kehl S; Körber C; Hart N; Goecke TW; Schild RL; Siemer J
Ultraschall Med; 2012 Oct; 33(5):469-73. PubMed ID: 21630187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Incorporation of femur length leads to underestimation of fetal weight in asymmetric preterm growth restriction.
Proctor LK; Rushworth V; Shah PS; Keunen J; Windrim R; Ryan G; Kingdom J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Apr; 35(4):442-8. PubMed ID: 20196066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of sonographic fetal weight estimation formulas in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes.
Warshafsky C; Ronzoni S; Quaglietta P; Weiner E; Zaltz A; Barrett J; Melamed N; Aviram A
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Feb; 21(1):149. PubMed ID: 33607956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does use of a sex-specific model improve the accuracy of sonographic weight estimation?
Melamed N; Yogev Y; Ben-Haroush A; Meizner I; Mashiach R; Glezerman M
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 May; 39(5):549-57. PubMed ID: 21837761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Estimation of fetal weight in fetuses with abdominal wall defects: comparison of 2 recent sonographic formulas to the Hadlock formula.
Nicholas S; Tuuli MG; Dicke J; Macones GA; Stamilio D; Odibo AO
J Ultrasound Med; 2010 Jul; 29(7):1069-74. PubMed ID: 20587430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Disadvantages of a weight estimation formula for macrosomic fetuses: the Hart formula from a clinical perspective.
Weiss C; Oppelt P; Mayer RB
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Dec; 298(6):1101-1106. PubMed ID: 30284620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
