172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26424089)
21. Methylation analysis by DNA immunoprecipitation (MeDIP).
Vucic EA; Wilson IM; Campbell JM; Lam WL
Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 556():141-53. PubMed ID: 19488876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Genome-wide profiling of DNA methylation and gene expression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Chen C; Peng H; Huang X; Zhao M; Li Z; Yin N; Wang X; Yu F; Yin B; Yuan Y; Lu Q
Oncotarget; 2016 Jan; 7(4):4507-21. PubMed ID: 26683359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Whole-genome DNA methylation in skin lesions from patients with psoriasis vulgaris.
Zhang P; Zhao M; Liang G; Yin G; Huang D; Su F; Zhai H; Wang L; Su Y; Lu Q
J Autoimmun; 2013 Mar; 41():17-24. PubMed ID: 23369618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Analysis of the methylome of human embryonic stem cells employing methylated DNA immunoprecipitation coupled to next-generation sequencing.
Grimm C; Adjaye J
Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 873():281-95. PubMed ID: 22528363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Detection of DNA Methylation by MeDIP and MBDCap Assays: An Overview of Techniques.
Hsu HK; Weng YI; Hsu PY; Huang TH; Huang YW
Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2102():225-234. PubMed ID: 31989558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. MeDIP-HMM: genome-wide identification of distinct DNA methylation states from high-density tiling arrays.
Seifert M; Cortijo S; Colomé-Tatché M; Johannes F; Roudier F; Colot V
Bioinformatics; 2012 Nov; 28(22):2930-9. PubMed ID: 22989518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Genome-wide DNA methylome variation in two genetically distinct chicken lines using MethylC-seq.
Li J; Li R; Wang Y; Hu X; Zhao Y; Li L; Feng C; Gu X; Liang F; Lamont SJ; Hu S; Zhou H; Li N
BMC Genomics; 2015 Oct; 16():851. PubMed ID: 26497311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Functional DNA methylation differences between tissues, cell types, and across individuals discovered using the M&M algorithm.
Zhang B; Zhou Y; Lin N; Lowdon RF; Hong C; Nagarajan RP; Cheng JB; Li D; Stevens M; Lee HJ; Xing X; Zhou J; Sundaram V; Elliott G; Gu J; Shi T; Gascard P; Sigaroudinia M; Tlsty TD; Kadlecek T; Weiss A; O'Geen H; Farnham PJ; Maire CL; Ligon KL; Madden PA; Tam A; Moore R; Hirst M; Marra MA; Zhang B; Costello JF; Wang T
Genome Res; 2013 Sep; 23(9):1522-40. PubMed ID: 23804400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Using epigenomics data to predict gene expression in lung cancer.
Li J; Ching T; Huang S; Garmire LX
BMC Bioinformatics; 2015; 16 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S10. PubMed ID: 25861082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. AutoMeDIP-seq: a high-throughput, whole genome, DNA methylation assay.
Butcher LM; Beck S
Methods; 2010 Nov; 52(3):223-31. PubMed ID: 20385236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. DNA methylation profiling: comparison of genome-wide sequencing methods and the Infinium Human Methylation 450 Bead Chip.
Walker DL; Bhagwate AV; Baheti S; Smalley RL; Hilker CA; Sun Z; Cunningham JM
Epigenomics; 2015; 7(8):1287-302. PubMed ID: 26192535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Efficiency of methylated DNA immunoprecipitation bisulphite sequencing for whole-genome DNA methylation analysis.
Jeong HM; Lee S; Chae H; Kim R; Kwon MJ; Oh E; Choi YL; Kim S; Shin YK
Epigenomics; 2016 Aug; 8(8):1061-77. PubMed ID: 27266718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Statistical method evaluation for differentially methylated CpGs in base resolution next-generation DNA sequencing data.
Zhang Y; Baheti S; Sun Z
Brief Bioinform; 2018 May; 19(3):374-386. PubMed ID: 28040747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of MeDIP-chip in the context of whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS-seq) in Arabidopsis.
Wardenaar R; Liu H; Colot V; Colomé-Tatché M; Johannes F
Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1067():203-24. PubMed ID: 23975794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Quantitative Comparison of Large-Scale DNA Enrichment Sequencing Data.
Lienhard M; Chavez L
Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1418():191-208. PubMed ID: 27008016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Genome-wide high-resolution mapping of DNA methylation identifies epigenetic variation across embryo and endosperm in Maize (Zea may).
Wang P; Xia H; Zhang Y; Zhao S; Zhao C; Hou L; Li C; Li A; Ma C; Wang X
BMC Genomics; 2015 Jan; 16(1):21. PubMed ID: 25612809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. High resolution methylome map of rat indicates role of intragenic DNA methylation in identification of coding region.
Sati S; Tanwar VS; Kumar KA; Patowary A; Jain V; Ghosh S; Ahmad S; Singh M; Reddy SU; Chandak GR; Raghunath M; Sivasubbu S; Chakraborty K; Scaria V; Sengupta S
PLoS One; 2012; 7(2):e31621. PubMed ID: 22355382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. MBRidge: an accurate and cost-effective method for profiling DNA methylome at single-base resolution.
Cai W; Mao F; Teng H; Cai T; Zhao F; Wu J; Sun ZS
J Mol Cell Biol; 2015 Aug; 7(4):299-313. PubMed ID: 26078362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Analyzing DNA-Immunoprecipitation Sequencing Data.
Lentini A; Nestor CE
Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2198():431-439. PubMed ID: 32822048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Standardization and quality controls for the methylated DNA immunoprecipitation technique.
Lisanti S; von Zglinicki T; Mathers JC
Epigenetics; 2012 Jun; 7(6):615-25. PubMed ID: 22507898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]