These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1080 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26424344)

  • 21. Complications Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Incidence, Independent Risk Factors, and Clinical Impact.
    Jenkins NW; Parrish JM; Hrynewycz NM; Brundage TS; Singh K
    Clin Spine Surg; 2020 Jun; 33(5):E236-E240. PubMed ID: 31913178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [COMPARISON OF EFFECTIVENESS BETWEEN PARA-MEDIAN INCISION MINIMALLY INVASIVE AND OPEN TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION FOR SINGLE SEGMENTAL LUMBAR DEGENERATIVE DISEASE].
    Qi Q; Xiao Q; Deng L; Li C; Dong X
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Oct; 29(10):1253-8. PubMed ID: 26749734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Disease.
    Li HM; Zhang RJ; Shen CL
    World Neurosurg; 2019 Feb; 122():e627-e638. PubMed ID: 31108079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Perioperative Comparison of Robotic-Assisted Versus Fluoroscopically Guided Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    De Biase G; Gassie K; Garcia D; Abode-Iyamah K; Deen G; Nottmeier E; Chen S
    World Neurosurg; 2021 May; 149():e570-e575. PubMed ID: 33549930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of adjacent segment disease after minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Yee TJ; Terman SW; La Marca F; Park P
    J Clin Neurosci; 2014 Oct; 21(10):1796-801. PubMed ID: 24880486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Complications Between Percutaneous Endoscopic and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Zhu L; Cai T; Shan Y; Zhang W; Zhang L; Feng X
    Pain Physician; 2021 Sep; 24(6):441-452. PubMed ID: 34554684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Expandable Cages: Increased Risk of Late Postoperative Subsidence Without a Real Improvement of Perioperative Outcomes: A Clinical Monocentric Study.
    Armocida D; Pesce A; Cimatti M; Proietti L; Santoro A; Frati A
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Dec; 156():e57-e63. PubMed ID: 34492389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of perioperative outcomes following open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in obese patients.
    Lau D; Khan A; Terman SW; Yee T; La Marca F; Park P
    Neurosurg Focus; 2013 Aug; 35(2):E10. PubMed ID: 23905948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison between Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Conventional Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An Updated Meta-analysis.
    Xie L; Wu WJ; Liang Y
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2016 Aug; 129(16):1969-86. PubMed ID: 27503024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Long-term clinical outcome of minimally invasive versus open single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar diseases: a meta-analysis.
    Heemskerk JL; Oluwadara Akinduro O; Clifton W; Quiñones-Hinojosa A; Abode-Iyamah KO
    Spine J; 2021 Dec; 21(12):2049-2065. PubMed ID: 34273567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Impact of lumbar interbody fusion surgery on postoperative outcomes in patients with recurrent lumbar disc herniation: Analysis of the US national inpatient sample.
    Ye YP; Hu JW; Zhang YG; Xu H
    J Clin Neurosci; 2019 Dec; 70():20-26. PubMed ID: 31630917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for massive lumbar disc herniation.
    Liu C; Zhou Y
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2019 Jan; 176():19-24. PubMed ID: 30476700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Radiographic Analysis of One-level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MI-TLIF) With Unilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases.
    Shen X; Wang L; Zhang H; Gu X; Gu G; He S
    Clin Spine Surg; 2016 Feb; 29(1):E1-8. PubMed ID: 24189485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion, Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion, and Open Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Single-Level Spondylolisthesis of L4-L5.
    Jang HD; Lee JC; Seo JH; Roh YH; Choi SW; Shin BJ
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Feb; 158():e10-e18. PubMed ID: 34637941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Is minimally invasive superior than open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single-level degenerative lumbar diseases: a meta-analysis.
    Li A; Li X; Zhong Y
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2018 Sep; 13(1):241. PubMed ID: 30236132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Single-Level Anterolateral and Posterior Interbody Fusion Techniques are Associated With Equivalent Long-Term Lumbar Reoperations.
    Narendran N; Nilssen PK; Skaggs DL; Kim SD; Perry TG; Mikhail CM; Tuchman A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2024 Sep; 49(17):1241-1247. PubMed ID: 38093607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of clinical outcomes among obese patients.
    Terman SW; Yee TJ; Lau D; Khan AA; La Marca F; Park P
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Jun; 20(6):644-52. PubMed ID: 24745355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MI-TLIF): A Video Technique Guide.
    Saela S; Pompliano M; Varghese J; Sinha K; Faloon M; Emami A
    JBJS Essent Surg Tech; 2023; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 38380431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Use of motor evoked potentials during lateral lumbar interbody fusion reduces postoperative deficits.
    Riley MR; Doan AT; Vogel RW; Aguirre AO; Pieri KS; Scheid EH
    Spine J; 2018 Oct; 18(10):1763-1778. PubMed ID: 29505853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable versus static interbody devices: radiographic assessment of sagittal segmental and pelvic parameters.
    Hawasli AH; Khalifeh JM; Chatrath A; Yarbrough CK; Ray WZ
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E10. PubMed ID: 28760032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 54.