BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1090 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26424344)

  • 21. Comparison of peri-operative and 12-month lifestyle outcomes in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus conventional lumbar fusion.
    Virdee JS; Nadig A; Anagnostopoulos G; George KJ
    Br J Neurosurg; 2017 Apr; 31(2):167-171. PubMed ID: 27331649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Complications Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Incidence, Independent Risk Factors, and Clinical Impact.
    Jenkins NW; Parrish JM; Hrynewycz NM; Brundage TS; Singh K
    Clin Spine Surg; 2020 Jun; 33(5):E236-E240. PubMed ID: 31913178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [COMPARISON OF EFFECTIVENESS BETWEEN PARA-MEDIAN INCISION MINIMALLY INVASIVE AND OPEN TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION FOR SINGLE SEGMENTAL LUMBAR DEGENERATIVE DISEASE].
    Qi Q; Xiao Q; Deng L; Li C; Dong X
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Oct; 29(10):1253-8. PubMed ID: 26749734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Disease.
    Li HM; Zhang RJ; Shen CL
    World Neurosurg; 2019 Feb; 122():e627-e638. PubMed ID: 31108079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Perioperative Comparison of Robotic-Assisted Versus Fluoroscopically Guided Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    De Biase G; Gassie K; Garcia D; Abode-Iyamah K; Deen G; Nottmeier E; Chen S
    World Neurosurg; 2021 May; 149():e570-e575. PubMed ID: 33549930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of adjacent segment disease after minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Yee TJ; Terman SW; La Marca F; Park P
    J Clin Neurosci; 2014 Oct; 21(10):1796-801. PubMed ID: 24880486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Complications Between Percutaneous Endoscopic and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Zhu L; Cai T; Shan Y; Zhang W; Zhang L; Feng X
    Pain Physician; 2021 Sep; 24(6):441-452. PubMed ID: 34554684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Expandable Cages: Increased Risk of Late Postoperative Subsidence Without a Real Improvement of Perioperative Outcomes: A Clinical Monocentric Study.
    Armocida D; Pesce A; Cimatti M; Proietti L; Santoro A; Frati A
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Dec; 156():e57-e63. PubMed ID: 34492389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of perioperative outcomes following open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in obese patients.
    Lau D; Khan A; Terman SW; Yee T; La Marca F; Park P
    Neurosurg Focus; 2013 Aug; 35(2):E10. PubMed ID: 23905948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison between Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Conventional Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An Updated Meta-analysis.
    Xie L; Wu WJ; Liang Y
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2016 Aug; 129(16):1969-86. PubMed ID: 27503024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Long-term clinical outcome of minimally invasive versus open single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar diseases: a meta-analysis.
    Heemskerk JL; Oluwadara Akinduro O; Clifton W; Quiñones-Hinojosa A; Abode-Iyamah KO
    Spine J; 2021 Dec; 21(12):2049-2065. PubMed ID: 34273567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Impact of lumbar interbody fusion surgery on postoperative outcomes in patients with recurrent lumbar disc herniation: Analysis of the US national inpatient sample.
    Ye YP; Hu JW; Zhang YG; Xu H
    J Clin Neurosci; 2019 Dec; 70():20-26. PubMed ID: 31630917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for massive lumbar disc herniation.
    Liu C; Zhou Y
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2019 Jan; 176():19-24. PubMed ID: 30476700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Radiographic Analysis of One-level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MI-TLIF) With Unilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases.
    Shen X; Wang L; Zhang H; Gu X; Gu G; He S
    Clin Spine Surg; 2016 Feb; 29(1):E1-8. PubMed ID: 24189485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion, Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion, and Open Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Single-Level Spondylolisthesis of L4-L5.
    Jang HD; Lee JC; Seo JH; Roh YH; Choi SW; Shin BJ
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Feb; 158():e10-e18. PubMed ID: 34637941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Is minimally invasive superior than open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single-level degenerative lumbar diseases: a meta-analysis.
    Li A; Li X; Zhong Y
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2018 Sep; 13(1):241. PubMed ID: 30236132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of clinical outcomes among obese patients.
    Terman SW; Yee TJ; Lau D; Khan AA; La Marca F; Park P
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Jun; 20(6):644-52. PubMed ID: 24745355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MI-TLIF): A Video Technique Guide.
    Saela S; Pompliano M; Varghese J; Sinha K; Faloon M; Emami A
    JBJS Essent Surg Tech; 2023; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 38380431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Use of motor evoked potentials during lateral lumbar interbody fusion reduces postoperative deficits.
    Riley MR; Doan AT; Vogel RW; Aguirre AO; Pieri KS; Scheid EH
    Spine J; 2018 Oct; 18(10):1763-1778. PubMed ID: 29505853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable versus static interbody devices: radiographic assessment of sagittal segmental and pelvic parameters.
    Hawasli AH; Khalifeh JM; Chatrath A; Yarbrough CK; Ray WZ
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E10. PubMed ID: 28760032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 55.