BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26424438)

  • 1. The Novel Object and Unusual Name (NOUN) Database: A collection of novel images for use in experimental research.
    Horst JS; Hout MC
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Dec; 48(4):1393-1409. PubMed ID: 26424438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. MM-MDS: a multidimensional scaling database with similarity ratings for 240 object categories from the Massive Memory picture database.
    Hout MC; Goldinger SD; Brady KJ
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e112644. PubMed ID: 25390369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual object categorisation at distinct levels of abstraction: a new stimulus set.
    Op de Beeck H; Wagemans J
    Perception; 2001; 30(11):1337-61. PubMed ID: 11768488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Naming guides how 12-month-old infants encode and remember objects.
    LaTourrette AS; Waxman SR
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Sep; 117(35):21230-21234. PubMed ID: 32817508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Border collie comprehends object names as verbal referents.
    Pilley JW; Reid AK
    Behav Processes; 2011 Feb; 86(2):184-95. PubMed ID: 21145379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A visual object stimulus database with standardized similarity information.
    Migo EM; Montaldi D; Mayes AR
    Behav Res Methods; 2013 Jun; 45(2):344-54. PubMed ID: 23055161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multimodal similarity and categorization of novel, three-dimensional objects.
    Cooke T; Jäkel F; Wallraven C; Bülthoff HH
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Feb; 45(3):484-95. PubMed ID: 16580027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Nencki Affective Picture System (NAPS): introduction to a novel, standardized, wide-range, high-quality, realistic picture database.
    Marchewka A; Zurawski Ł; Jednoróg K; Grabowska A
    Behav Res Methods; 2014 Jun; 46(2):596-610. PubMed ID: 23996831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistical learning is constrained to less abstract patterns in complex sensory input (but not the least).
    Emberson LL; Rubinstein DY
    Cognition; 2016 Aug; 153():63-78. PubMed ID: 27139779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The importance of object similarity in the production and identification of actions associated with objects.
    Desmarais G; Pensa MC; Dixon MJ; Roy EA
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2007 Nov; 13(6):1021-34. PubMed ID: 17942020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The transfer of object learning across exemplars and their orientation is related to perceptual similarity.
    Baeck A; Windey I; Op de Beeck HP
    Vision Res; 2012 Sep; 68():40-7. PubMed ID: 22819729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Are names ever mapped onto preexisting categories?
    Merriman WE; Schuster JM; Hager L
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1991 Sep; 120(3):288-300. PubMed ID: 1836492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A visual object naming task standardized for the Croatian language: a tool for research and clinical practice.
    Rogić M; Jerončić A; Bošnjak M; Sedlar A; Hren D; Deletis V
    Behav Res Methods; 2013 Dec; 45(4):1144-58. PubMed ID: 23344740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of semantic similarity in novel associations: Direct and indirect routes to action.
    Macdonald SN; Richards ED; Desmarais G
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jan; 78(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 26704564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Color naming and categorization in inherited color vision deficiencies.
    Bonnardel V
    Vis Neurosci; 2006; 23(3-4):637-43. PubMed ID: 16962007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation of the C.A.R.E. stimulus set of 640 animal pictures: Name agreement and quality ratings.
    Russo N; Hagmann CE; Andrews R; Black C; Silberman M; Shea N
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0192906. PubMed ID: 29489882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What's in a shape? Children represent shape variability differently than adults when naming objects.
    Abecassis M; Sera MD; Yonas A; Schwade J
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2001 Mar; 78(3):213-39. PubMed ID: 11222000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A standardized set of 3-D objects for virtual reality research and applications.
    Peeters D
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Jun; 50(3):1047-1054. PubMed ID: 28646401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Semantic context and visual feature effects in object naming: an fMRI study using arterial spin labeling.
    Hocking J; McMahon KL; de Zubicaray GI
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1571-83. PubMed ID: 18823254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Competition Between Object Topology and Surface Features in Children's Extension of Novel Nouns.
    Kenderla P; Kim SH; Kibbe MM
    Open Mind (Camb); 2023; 7():93-110. PubMed ID: 37416072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.