BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26426285)

  • 1. Clinimetric properties and clinical utility in rehabilitation of postsurgical scar rating scales: a systematic review.
    Vercelli S; Ferriero G; Sartorio F; Cisari C; Bravini E
    Int J Rehabil Res; 2015 Dec; 38(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 26426285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How to assess postsurgical scars: a review of outcome measures.
    Vercelli S; Ferriero G; Sartorio F; Stissi V; Franchignoni F
    Disabil Rehabil; 2009; 31(25):2055-63. PubMed ID: 19888834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability and Photographic Equivalency of the Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) Scale, an Outcome Measure for Postoperative Scars.
    Kantor J
    JAMA Dermatol; 2017 Jan; 153(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 27806156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rasch Analysis of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale in Linear Scars: Suggestions for a Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale v2.1.
    Franchignoni F; Giordano A; Vercelli S; Bravini E; Stissi V; Ferriero G
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Dec; 144(6):1073e-1079e. PubMed ID: 31764669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A systematic review of the quality of burn scar rating scales for clinical and research use.
    Tyack Z; Simons M; Spinks A; Wasiak J
    Burns; 2012 Feb; 38(1):6-18. PubMed ID: 22047828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments for Surgical and Traumatic Scars: A Systematic Review of their Development, Content, and Psychometric Validation.
    Mundy LR; Miller HC; Klassen AF; Cano SJ; Pusic AL
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2016 Oct; 40(5):792-800. PubMed ID: 27357634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Psychometric Findings for the SCAR-Q Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Based on 731 Children and Adults with Surgical, Traumatic, and Burn Scars from Four Countries.
    Ziolkowski NI; Pusic AL; Fish JS; Mundy LR; Wong She R; Forrest CR; Hollenbeck S; Arriagada C; Calcagno M; Greenhalgh D; Klassen AF
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Sep; 146(3):331e-338e. PubMed ID: 32842115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability and validity testing of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale in evaluating linear scars after breast cancer surgery.
    Truong PT; Lee JC; Soer B; Gaul CA; Olivotto IA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2007 Feb; 119(2):487-94. PubMed ID: 17230080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Subjective scar assessment scales in orthopaedic surgery and determinants of patient satisfaction: A systematic review of the literature.
    Abelleyra Lastoria DA; Benny CK; Hing CB
    Chin J Traumatol; 2023 Sep; 26(5):276-283. PubMed ID: 36804261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Standardized assessment of breast cancer surgical scars integrating the Vancouver Scar Scale, Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire, and patients' perspectives.
    Truong PT; Abnousi F; Yong CM; Hayashi A; Runkel JA; Phillips T; Olivotto IA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Oct; 116(5):1291-9. PubMed ID: 16217470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Health professionals' and consumers' opinion: what is considered important when rating burn scars from photographs?
    Simons M; Tyack Z
    J Burn Care Res; 2011; 32(2):275-85. PubMed ID: 21233729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rasch analysis of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) in burn scars.
    van der Wal MB; Tuinebreijer WE; Bloemen MC; Verhaegen PD; Middelkoop E; van Zuijlen PP
    Qual Life Res; 2012 Feb; 21(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 21598065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The SCAR (Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating) scale: development and validation of a new outcome measure for postoperative scar assessment.
    Kantor J
    Br J Dermatol; 2016 Dec; 175(6):1394-1396. PubMed ID: 27292082
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Scar Assessment After Breast Augmentation Surgery with Axillary Incision versus Inframammary Fold Incision: Long-Term Follow-Up in Chinese Patients.
    Sun J; Mu D; Liu C; Ji K; Chen L; Liu W; Luan J
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2016 Oct; 40(5):699-706. PubMed ID: 27484988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A guide to choosing a burn scar rating scale for clinical or research use.
    Tyack Z; Wasiak J; Spinks A; Kimble R; Simons M
    Burns; 2013 Nov; 39(7):1341-50. PubMed ID: 23768711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The patient and observer scar assessment scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation.
    Draaijers LJ; Tempelman FR; Botman YA; Tuinebreijer WE; Middelkoop E; Kreis RW; van Zuijlen PP
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Jun; 113(7):1960-5; discussion 1966-7. PubMed ID: 15253184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Objective scar assessment tools: a clinimetric appraisal.
    Verhaegen PDHM; van der Wal MBA; Middelkoop E; van Zuijlen PPM
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Apr; 127(4):1561-1570. PubMed ID: 21460665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The use of the Scar Cosmesis Assessment and rating scale to evaluate the cosmetic outcomes of totally thoracoscopic cardiac surgery.
    Huang LC; Chen DZ; Chen LW; Xu QC; Zheng ZH; Dai XF
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Sep; 15(1):250. PubMed ID: 32917246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validated Outcome Measures and Postsurgical Scar Assessment Instruments in Eyelid Surgery: A Systematic Review.
    Ramanathan D; Chu S; Prendes M; Carroll BT
    Dermatol Surg; 2021 Jul; 47(7):914-920. PubMed ID: 33988553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The dermatology life quality index as a means to assess life quality in patients with different scar types.
    Reinholz M; Poetschke J; Schwaiger H; Epple A; Ruzicka T; Gauglitz GG
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2015 Nov; 29(11):2112-9. PubMed ID: 25866177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.