BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

473 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26426943)

  • 41. A More Efficient Causal Mediator Model Without the No-Unmeasured-Confounder Assumption.
    Brandt H
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(4):531-552. PubMed ID: 31497999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Sensitivity analysis for unobserved confounding of direct and indirect effects using uncertainty intervals.
    Lindmark A; de Luna X; Eriksson M
    Stat Med; 2018 May; 37(10):1744-1762. PubMed ID: 29462839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Mediation Analysis: A Practitioner's Guide.
    VanderWeele TJ
    Annu Rev Public Health; 2016; 37():17-32. PubMed ID: 26653405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Estimating controlled direct effects in the presence of intermediate confounding of the mediator-outcome relationship: Comparison of five different methods.
    Lepage B; Dedieu D; Savy N; Lang T
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Apr; 25(2):553-70. PubMed ID: 23070596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Interpreting treatment-effect estimates with heterogeneity and choice: simulation model results.
    Brooks JM; Fang G
    Clin Ther; 2009 Apr; 31(4):902-19. PubMed ID: 19446162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Implications of M bias in epidemiologic studies: a simulation study.
    Liu W; Brookhart MA; Schneeweiss S; Mi X; Setoguchi S
    Am J Epidemiol; 2012 Nov; 176(10):938-48. PubMed ID: 23100247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. On a preference-based instrumental variable approach in reducing unmeasured confounding-by-indication.
    Li Y; Lee Y; Wolfe RA; Morgenstern H; Zhang J; Port FK; Robinson BM
    Stat Med; 2015 Mar; 34(7):1150-68. PubMed ID: 25546152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Introduction to causal diagrams for confounder selection.
    Williamson EJ; Aitken Z; Lawrie J; Dharmage SC; Burgess JA; Forbes AB
    Respirology; 2014 Apr; 19(3):303-11. PubMed ID: 24447391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in causal mediation analysis.
    McCandless LC; Somers JM
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Feb; 28(2):515-531. PubMed ID: 28882092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. On model selection and model misspecification in causal inference.
    Vansteelandt S; Bekaert M; Claeskens G
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2012 Feb; 21(1):7-30. PubMed ID: 21075803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Unmeasured confounding in pharmacoepidemiology.
    Groenwold RH; de Groot MC; Ramamoorthy D; Souverein PC; Klungel OH
    Ann Epidemiol; 2016 Jan; 26(1):85-6. PubMed ID: 26559329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Bounding formulas for selection bias.
    Huang TH; Lee WC
    Am J Epidemiol; 2015 Nov; 182(10):868-72. PubMed ID: 26519426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Bias formulas for sensitivity analysis of unmeasured confounding for general outcomes, treatments, and confounders.
    Vanderweele TJ; Arah OA
    Epidemiology; 2011 Jan; 22(1):42-52. PubMed ID: 21052008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Regularized Regression Versus the High-Dimensional Propensity Score for Confounding Adjustment in Secondary Database Analyses.
    Franklin JM; Eddings W; Glynn RJ; Schneeweiss S
    Am J Epidemiol; 2015 Oct; 182(7):651-9. PubMed ID: 26233956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Assessing the sensitivity of regression results to unmeasured confounders in observational studies.
    Lin DY; Psaty BM; Kronmal RA
    Biometrics; 1998 Sep; 54(3):948-63. PubMed ID: 9750244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effect decomposition in the presence of an exposure-induced mediator-outcome confounder.
    Vanderweele TJ; Vansteelandt S; Robins JM
    Epidemiology; 2014 Mar; 25(2):300-6. PubMed ID: 24487213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Identification and robust estimation of swapped direct and indirect effects: Mediation analysis with unmeasured mediator-outcome confounding and intermediate confounding.
    Tai AS; Lin SH
    Stat Med; 2022 Sep; 41(21):4143-4158. PubMed ID: 35716042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Sensitivity analysis for interactions under unmeasured confounding.
    Vanderweele TJ; Mukherjee B; Chen J
    Stat Med; 2012 Sep; 31(22):2552-64. PubMed ID: 21976358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Within-Subject Mediation Analysis in AB/BA Crossover Designs.
    Josephy H; Vansteelandt S; Vanderhasselt MA; Loeys T
    Int J Biostat; 2015 May; 11(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 25849799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Simulation study of instrumental variable approaches with an application to a study of the antidiabetic effect of bezafibrate.
    Cai B; Hennessy S; Flory JH; Sha D; Ten Have TR; Small DS
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2012 May; 21 Suppl 2():114-20. PubMed ID: 22552986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.