These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
914 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26426993)
1. Prognosis of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after esophagectomy using the log odds of positive lymph nodes. Wu SG; Sun JY; Yang LC; Zhou J; Li FY; Li Q; Lin HX; Lin Q; He ZY Oncotarget; 2015 Nov; 6(34):36911-22. PubMed ID: 26426993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Predictive value of log odds of positive lymph nodes for the prognosis of patients with node-negative squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus after radical esophagectomy]. Yang M; Zhang H; Huo X; Chen C; Yu Z Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 May; 19(5):535-9. PubMed ID: 27215521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prognostic value of different lymph node staging methods in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after esophagectomy. Wu SG; Li FY; Zhou J; Lin Q; Sun JY; Lin HX; Guan XX; He ZY Ann Thorac Surg; 2015 Jan; 99(1):284-90. PubMed ID: 25440270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lymph node ratio-based staging system for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Chen SB; Weng HR; Wang G; Zou XF; Liu DT; Chen YP; Zhang H World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Jun; 21(24):7514-21. PubMed ID: 26139998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of Lymph Node Ratio to Replace the pN Categories System of Classification of the TNM System in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Shao Y; Geng Y; Gu W; Ning Z; Huang J; Pei H; Jiang J J Thorac Oncol; 2016 Oct; 11(10):1774-84. PubMed ID: 27393473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Log Odds of Positive Lymph Nodes Predicts Survival in Patients After Resection for Esophageal Cancer. Cao J; Yuan P; Ma H; Ye P; Wang Y; Yuan X; Bao F; Lv W; Hu J Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Aug; 102(2):424-32. PubMed ID: 27180928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The prognostic performance of the log odds of positive lymph nodes in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A population study of the US SEER database and a Chinese single-institution cohort. Zhang H; Xiao W; Ren P; Zhu K; Jia R; Yang Y; Gong L; Yu Z; Tang P Cancer Med; 2021 Sep; 10(17):6149-6164. PubMed ID: 34240812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of three lymph node staging systems in evaluating the prognosis of patients with pT3 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Liu DT; Wang LS; Chen YP; Chen SB Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):17161. PubMed ID: 33051518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Metastatic lymph node ratio demonstrates better prognostic stratification than pN staging in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after esophagectomy. Zhang H; Liang H; Gao Y; Shang X; Gong L; Ma Z; Sun K; Tang P; Yu Z Sci Rep; 2016 Dec; 6():38804. PubMed ID: 27941828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prognostic assessment of different lymph node staging methods for pancreatic cancer with R0 resection: pN staging, lymph node ratio, log odds of positive lymph nodes. La Torre M; Nigri G; Petrucciani N; Cavallini M; Aurello P; Cosenza G; Balducci G; Ziparo V; Ramacciato G Pancreatology; 2014; 14(4):289-94. PubMed ID: 25062879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prognostic value of three different lymph node staging systems in the survival of patients with gastric cancer following D2 lymphadenectomy. Jian-Hui C; Shi-Rong C; Hui W; Si-le C; Jian-Bo X; Er-Tao Z; Chuang-Qi C; Yu-Long H Tumour Biol; 2016 Aug; 37(8):11105-13. PubMed ID: 26912060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Superiority of log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) for prognostic prediction after gastric cancer surgery: a multi-institutional analysis of 7620 patients in China. Gu P; Deng J; Sun Z; Wang Z; Wang W; Liang H; Xu H; Zhou Z Surg Today; 2021 Jan; 51(1):101-110. PubMed ID: 32754844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cervical lymph node metastasis classified as regional nodal staging in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after radical esophagectomy and three-field lymph node dissection. Chen J; Wu S; Zheng X; Pan J; Zhu K; Chen Y; Li J; Liao L; Lin Y; Liao Z BMC Surg; 2014 Dec; 14():110. PubMed ID: 25527100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Prognostic value of three different staging schemes based on pN, MLR and LODDS in patients with T3 esophageal cancer]. Wang L; Cai L; Chen Q; Jiang YH Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2017 Oct; 39(10):749-753. PubMed ID: 29061018 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Log odds of positive lymph nodes predicts survival in patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy followed by esophagectomy. Ye G; Chen Z; Wang L; Hu Z; Bian Y; Yang X; Lu T; Zhan C; Lin Z; Wang Q J Surg Oncol; 2020 Jun; 121(7):1074-1083. PubMed ID: 32141098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Numeric pathologic lymph node classification shows prognostic superiority to topographic pN classification in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Sugawara K; Yamashita H; Uemura Y; Mitsui T; Yagi K; Nishida M; Aikou S; Mori K; Nomura S; Seto Y Surgery; 2017 Oct; 162(4):846-856. PubMed ID: 28739092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Log odds of positive lymph nodes may predict survival benefit in patients with node-positive non-small cell lung cancer. Deng W; Xu T; Wang Y; Xu Y; Yang P; Gomez D; Liao Z Lung Cancer; 2018 Aug; 122():60-66. PubMed ID: 30032846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of 4 lymph node staging systems for the prognostic prediction of esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma with ≤15 retrieved lymph nodes. Yang Y; Zheng J; Li Y Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 May; 48(5):1017-1024. PubMed ID: 34876328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Lymph node station ratio: Revised nodal category for resected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients. Fu X; Liu Q; Luo K; Wen J; Yang H; Hu Y; Wang X; Lin P; Fu J J Surg Oncol; 2017 Dec; 116(7):939-946. PubMed ID: 28703872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Influence of number of removed lymph nodes on the TNM staging and survival in advanced esophageal carcinoma]. Chen LQ; Hu CY; Zhang HL; He M; Meng XL; Ping YM Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2007 Aug; 29(8):604-8. PubMed ID: 18210881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]