These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26427637)
1. Speech Intelligibility in Noise With a Pinna Effect Imitating Cochlear Implant Processor. Wimmer W; Weder S; Caversaccio M; Kompis M Otol Neurotol; 2016 Jan; 37(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 26427637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Speech polar plots for different directionality settings of SONNET cochlear implant processor. De Ceulaer G; Pascoal D; Nopp P; Péan V; J Govaerts P Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 Nov; 20(6):299-311. PubMed ID: 31453760 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Speech perception in noise and sound localization using different microphone modes in pediatric bilateral cochlear implant users. Müller V; Krause J; Klünter HD; Streicher B; Lang-Roth R Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 May; 156():111117. PubMed ID: 35366421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Benefit of the UltraZoom beamforming technology in noise in cochlear implant users. Mosnier I; Mathias N; Flament J; Amar D; Liagre-Callies A; Borel S; Ambert-Dahan E; Sterkers O; Bernardeschi D Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Sep; 274(9):3335-3342. PubMed ID: 28664331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Speech Perception in Quiet and Noise With an Off the Ear CI Processor Enabling Adaptive Microphone Directionality. Wesarg T; Voss B; Hassepass F; Beck R; Aschendorff A; Laszig R; Arndt S Otol Neurotol; 2018 Apr; 39(4):e240-e249. PubMed ID: 29533332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fixed and adaptive beamforming improves speech perception in noise in cochlear implant recipients equipped with the MED-EL SONNET audio processor. Honeder C; Liepins R; Arnoldner C; Šinkovec H; Kaider A; Vyskocil E; Riss D PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0190718. PubMed ID: 29304186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Speech understanding and listening effort in cochlear implant users - microphone beamformers lead to significant improvements in noisy environments. Büchner A; Schwebs M; Lenarz T Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 Jan; 21(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 31590612 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Microphone directionality and wind noise reduction enhance speech perception in users of the MED-EL SONNET audio processor. Hagen R; Radeloff A; Stark T; Anderson I; Nopp P; Aschbacher E; Möltner A; Khajehnouri Y; Rak K Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 Jan; 21(1):53-65. PubMed ID: 31524107 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of a moving noise masker on speech perception in cochlear implant users. Weissgerber T; Rader T; Baumann U PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0126133. PubMed ID: 25970594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The efficacy of microphone directionality in improving speech recognition in noise for three commercial cochlear-implant systems. Sivonen V; Willberg T; Aarnisalo AA; Dietz A Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 May; 21(3):153-159. PubMed ID: 32160829 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Speech Intelligibility in Various Noise Conditions with the Nucleus® 5 CP810 Sound Processor. Dillier N; Lai WK Audiol Res; 2015 Jun; 5(2):132. PubMed ID: 26779327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effectiveness of Directional Microphones in Bilateral/Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users-Impact of Spatial and Temporal Noise Characteristics. Weissgerber T; Rader T; Baumann U Otol Neurotol; 2017 Dec; 38(10):e551-e557. PubMed ID: 29135876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Speech Intelligibility in Noise With a Single-Unit Cochlear Implant Audio Processor. Wimmer W; Caversaccio M; Kompis M Otol Neurotol; 2015 Aug; 36(7):1197-202. PubMed ID: 25894727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Benefit of a commercially available cochlear implant processor with dual-microphone beamforming: a multi-center study. Wolfe J; Parkinson A; Schafer EC; Gilden J; Rehwinkel K; Mansanares J; Coughlan E; Wright J; Torres J; Gannaway S Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):553-60. PubMed ID: 22588233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of speech discrimination in noise and directional hearing with 2 different sound processors of a bone-anchored hearing system in adults with unilateral severe or profound sensorineural hearing loss. Wesarg T; Aschendorff A; Laszig R; Beck R; Schild C; Hassepass F; Kroeger S; Hocke T; Arndt S Otol Neurotol; 2013 Aug; 34(6):1064-70. PubMed ID: 23856626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Investigating Speech Recognition and listening effort with different device configurations in adult cochlear implant users. Sladen DP; Nie Y; Berg K Cochlear Implants Int; 2018 May; 19(3):119-130. PubMed ID: 29457564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Combining directional microphone and single-channel noise reduction algorithms: a clinical evaluation in difficult listening conditions with cochlear implant users. Hersbach AA; Arora K; Mauger SJ; Dawson PW Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):e13-23. PubMed ID: 22555182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of Microphone Configuration and Sound Source Location on Speech Recognition for Adult Cochlear Implant Users with Current-Generation Sound Processors. Dwyer RT; Roberts J; Gifford RH J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Sep; 31(8):578-589. PubMed ID: 32340055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Speech-in-noise and subjective benefit with active middle ear implant omnidirectional and directional microphones: a within-subjects comparison. Wolframm MD; Giarbini N; Streitberger C Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):618-22. PubMed ID: 22569145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of speech reception threshold in noise in young Cochlear™ Nucleus Razza S; Zaccone M; Meli A; Cristofari E Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Dec; 103():71-75. PubMed ID: 29224769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]