These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26428768)

  • 1. Enhancing listener strategies using a payoff matrix in speech-on-speech masking experiments.
    Thompson ER; Iyer N; Simpson BD; Wakefield GH; Kieras DE; Brungart DS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Sep; 138(3):1297-304. PubMed ID: 26428768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level.
    Summers V; Molis MR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr; 47(2):245-56. PubMed ID: 15157127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Phatak SA; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adding irrelevant information to the content prime reduces the prime-induced unmasking effect on speech recognition.
    Wu M; Li H; Gao Y; Lei M; Teng X; Wu X; Li L
    Hear Res; 2012 Jan; 283(1-2):136-43. PubMed ID: 22101022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bernstein JG; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of stimulus-related factors and hearing impairment on listening effort as indicated by pupil dilation.
    Ohlenforst B; Zekveld AA; Lunner T; Wendt D; Naylor G; Wang Y; Versfeld NJ; Kramer SE
    Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():68-79. PubMed ID: 28622894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Head movements while recognizing speech arriving from behind.
    Shen Y; Folkerts ML; Richards VM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Feb; 141(2):EL108. PubMed ID: 28253640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. English sentence recognition in speech-shaped noise and multi-talker babble for English-, Chinese-, and Korean-native listeners.
    Jin SH; Liu C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):EL391-7. PubMed ID: 23145700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Explaining intelligibility in speech-modulated maskers using acoustic glimpse analysis.
    Gibbs BE; Fogerty D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jun; 143(6):EL449. PubMed ID: 29960446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of periodic masker interruption on the intelligibility of interrupted speech.
    Iyer N; Brungart DS; Simpson BD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1693. PubMed ID: 17927429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Release from perceptual masking for children and adults: benefit of a carrier phrase.
    Bonino AY; Leibold LJ; Buss E
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 22836239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Release from informational masking in a monaural competing-speech task with vocoded copies of the maskers presented contralaterally.
    Bernstein JG; Iyer N; Brungart DS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):702-13. PubMed ID: 25698005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cochlear implant speech recognition with speech maskers.
    Stickney GS; Zeng FG; Litovsky R; Assmann P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Aug; 116(2):1081-91. PubMed ID: 15376674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Masked sentence recognition assessed at ascending target-to-masker ratios: modest effects of repeating stimuli.
    Buss E; Calandruccio L; Hall JW
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):e14-22. PubMed ID: 25329373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spatial release from masking based on binaural processing for up to six maskers.
    Yost WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):2093. PubMed ID: 28372135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech recognition in one- and two-talker maskers in school-age children and adults: Development of perceptual masking and glimpsing.
    Buss E; Leibold LJ; Porter HL; Grose JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2650. PubMed ID: 28464682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Toward a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of masker type and signal-to-noise ratio on the pupillary response while performing a speech-in-noise test.
    Wendt D; Koelewijn T; Książek P; Kramer SE; Lunner T
    Hear Res; 2018 Nov; 369():67-78. PubMed ID: 29858121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Psychometric functions for sentence recognition in sinusoidally amplitude-modulated noises.
    Shen Y; Manzano NK; Richards VM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3613-24. PubMed ID: 26723318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contribution of Stimulus Variability to Word Recognition in Noise Versus Two-Talker Speech for School-Age Children and Adults.
    Buss E; Calandruccio L; Oleson J; Leibold LJ
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(2):313-322. PubMed ID: 32881723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of periodicity in perceiving speech in quiet and in background noise.
    Steinmetzger K; Rosen S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3586-99. PubMed ID: 26723315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.