These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26428780)

  • 1. Temporal effects in priming of masked and degraded speech.
    Freyman RL; Morse-Fortier C; Griffin AM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Sep; 138(3):1418-27. PubMed ID: 26428780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of priming on energetic and informational masking in a same-different task.
    Jones JA; Freyman RL
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):124-33. PubMed ID: 21841488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Effect of Aging and Priming on Same/Different Judgments Between Text and Partially Masked Speech.
    Freyman RL; Terpening J; Costanzi AC; Helfer KS
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(6):672-680. PubMed ID: 28650352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of energetic and informational masking on The Words-in-Noise Test (WIN).
    Wilson RH; Trivette CP; Williams DA; Watts KL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(7):522-33. PubMed ID: 22992259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Enhancing speech intelligibility: interactions among context, modality, speech style, and masker.
    Van Engen KJ; Phelps JE; Smiljanic R; Chandrasekaran B
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 57(5):1908-18. PubMed ID: 24687206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recognition of vocoded words and sentences in quiet and multi-talker babble with children and adults.
    Goupell MJ; Draves GT; Litovsky RY
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0244632. PubMed ID: 33373427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pupil dilation uncovers extra listening effort in the presence of a single-talker masker.
    Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Festen JM; Kramer SE
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 21921797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Release from informational masking in a monaural competing-speech task with vocoded copies of the maskers presented contralaterally.
    Bernstein JG; Iyer N; Brungart DS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):702-13. PubMed ID: 25698005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cross-language differences in informational masking of speech by speech: English versus Mandarin Chinese.
    Wu X; Yang Z; Huang Y; Chen J; Li L; Daneman M; Schneider BA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 54(6):1506-24. PubMed ID: 22180019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Time course and cost of misdirecting auditory spatial attention in younger and older adults.
    Singh G; Pichora-Fuller MK; Schneider BA
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):711-21. PubMed ID: 24165300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of semantically related and unrelated text cues on the intelligibility of sentences in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Festen JM; van Beek JH; Rönnberg J
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):e16-25. PubMed ID: 21826004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of target-masker contextual similarity on the multimasker penalty in a three-talker diotic listening task.
    Iyer N; Brungart DS; Simpson BD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Nov; 128(5):2998-10. PubMed ID: 21110595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does it take older adults longer than younger adults to perceptually segregate a speech target from a background masker?
    Ben-David BM; Tse VY; Schneider BA
    Hear Res; 2012 Aug; 290(1-2):55-63. PubMed ID: 22609772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improvement of intelligibility of ideal binary-masked noisy speech by adding background noise.
    Cao S; Li L; Wu X
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Apr; 129(4):2227-36. PubMed ID: 21476677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of working memory capacity and semantic cues on the intelligibility of speech in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Rönnberg J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2225-34. PubMed ID: 23967952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level.
    Summers V; Molis MR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr; 47(2):245-56. PubMed ID: 15157127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of informational masking in reverberant, multi-talker environments.
    Westermann A; Buchholz JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Aug; 138(2):584-93. PubMed ID: 26328677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Age-related changes in listening effort for various types of masker noises.
    Desjardins JL; Doherty KA
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 23095723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.