These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26428912)

  • 1. The what, why, and how of born-open data.
    Rouder JN
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Sep; 48(3):1062-9. PubMed ID: 26428912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The persistence of fraud in the literature: the Darsee case.
    Kochan CA; Budd JM
    J Am Soc Inf Sci; 1992 Aug; 43(7):488-93. PubMed ID: 11653988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Special report: taking on the cheats.
    Nature; 2005 May; 435(7040):258-9. PubMed ID: 15902219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sharing scientific data I: new problems for IRBs.
    Sieber JE
    IRB; 1989; 11(6):4-7. PubMed ID: 11650286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Just post it: the lesson from two cases of fabricated data detected by statistics alone.
    Simonsohn U
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Oct; 24(10):1875-88. PubMed ID: 23982243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Putting Misinformation Under a Microscope: Exploring Technologies to Address Predatory False Information Online.
    Pomputius A
    Med Ref Serv Q; 2019; 38(4):369-375. PubMed ID: 31687908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sequence database versioning for command line and Galaxy bioinformatics servers.
    Dooley DM; Petkau AJ; Van Domselaar G; Hsiao WW
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Apr; 32(8):1275-7. PubMed ID: 26656932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Questions of scientific responsibility: the Baltimore case.
    Lang S
    Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(1):3-72. PubMed ID: 11653082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The project data sphere initiative: accelerating cancer research by sharing data.
    Green AK; Reeder-Hayes KE; Corty RW; Basch E; Milowsky MI; Dusetzina SB; Bennett AV; Wood WA
    Oncologist; 2015 May; 20(5):464-e20. PubMed ID: 25876994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What do we know about fraud and other forms of intellectual dishonesty in science? Part 2: why does fraud happen and what are its effects?
    Garfield E
    Curr Contents Clin Med; 1987 Apr; 15(15):3-10. PubMed ID: 11649943
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Life After Research Misconduct.
    Galbraith KL
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2017 Feb; 12(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 28220722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Phylesystem: a git-based data store for community-curated phylogenetic estimates.
    McTavish EJ; Hinchliff CE; Allman JF; Brown JW; Cranston KA; Holder MT; Rees JA; Smith SA
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Sep; 31(17):2794-800. PubMed ID: 25940563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Misconduct in science is not rare, a survey finds.
    Hilts PJ
    N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():A22. PubMed ID: 11647007
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. When are researchers willing to share their data? - Impacts of values and uncertainty on open data in academia.
    Stieglitz S; Wilms K; Mirbabaie M; Hofeditz L; Brenger B; López A; Rehwald S
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0234172. PubMed ID: 32609767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fraud in Academic Publishing: Researchers Under Cyber-Attacks.
    Dadkhah M; Borchardt G; Maliszewski T
    Am J Med; 2017 Jan; 130(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 27637600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Researchers have finally created a tool to spot duplicated images across thousands of papers.
    Butler D
    Nature; 2018 Mar; 555(7694):18. PubMed ID: 29493609
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dubious data remain in print two years after misconduct inquiry.
    Abbott A; Schwarz J
    Nature; 2002 Jul; 418(6894):113. PubMed ID: 12110849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microsoft's purchase of GitHub leaves some scientists uneasy.
    Silver A
    Nature; 2018 Jun; 558(7710):353. PubMed ID: 29921852
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Publication pressure and scientific misconduct in medical scientists.
    Tijdink JK; Verbeke R; Smulders YM
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2014 Dec; 9(5):64-71. PubMed ID: 25747691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fraud and secrecy: the twin perils of science.
    New Sci; 1983 Jun; 98(1361):712-3. PubMed ID: 11655551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.