215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26429259)
1. A two-stage method for microcalcification cluster segmentation in mammography by deformable models.
Arikidis N; Vassiou K; Kazantzi A; Skiadopoulos S; Karahaliou A; Costaridou L
Med Phys; 2015 Oct; 42(10):5848-61. PubMed ID: 26429259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. B-spline active rays segmentation of microcalcifications in mammography.
Arikidis NS; Skiadopoulos S; Karahaliou A; Likaki E; Panayiotakis G; Costaridou L
Med Phys; 2008 Nov; 35(11):5161-71. PubMed ID: 19070250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative comparison of clustered microcalcifications in for-presentation and for-processing mammograms in full-field digital mammography.
Wang J; Nishikawa RM; Yang Y
Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3726-3738. PubMed ID: 28477395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improving the accuracy in detection of clustered microcalcifications with a context-sensitive classification model.
Wang J; Nishikawa RM; Yang Y
Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 43(1):159. PubMed ID: 26745908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computerized analysis of mammographic microcalcifications in morphological and texture feature spaces.
Chan HP; Sahiner B; Lam KL; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Goodsitt MM; Adler DD
Med Phys; 1998 Oct; 25(10):2007-19. PubMed ID: 9800710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Size-adapted microcalcification segmentation in mammography utilizing scale-space signatures.
Arikidis NS; Karahaliou A; Skiadopoulos S; Korfiatis P; Likaki E; Panayiotakis G; Costaridou L
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2010 Sep; 34(6):487-93. PubMed ID: 20080386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Texture classification-based segmentation of lung affected by interstitial pneumonia in high-resolution CT.
Korfiatis P; Kalogeropoulou C; Karahaliou A; Kazantzi A; Skiadopoulos S; Costaridou L
Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5290-302. PubMed ID: 19175088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computerized evaluation of mammographic lesions: what diagnostic role does the shape of the individual microcalcifications play compared with the geometry of the cluster?
Leichter I; Lederman R; Buchbinder SS; Bamberger P; Novak B; Fields S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Mar; 182(3):705-12. PubMed ID: 14975973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computer-aided characterization of mammographic masses: accuracy of mass segmentation and its effects on characterization.
Sahiner B; Petrick N; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Paramagul C; Helvie MA; Gurcan MN
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1275-84. PubMed ID: 11811827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The simulation of 3D microcalcification clusters in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
Shaheen E; Van Ongeval C; Zanca F; Cockmartin L; Marshall N; Jacobs J; Young KC; R Dance D; Bosmans H
Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6659-71. PubMed ID: 22149848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automated classification of clustered microcalcifications into malignant and benign types.
Veldkamp WJ; Karssemeijer N; Otten JD; Hendriks JH
Med Phys; 2000 Nov; 27(11):2600-8. PubMed ID: 11128313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative assessment of microcalcification cluster image quality in digital breast tomosynthesis, 2-dimensional and synthetic mammography.
Petropoulos AE; Skiadopoulos SG; Karahaliou AN; Messaris GAT; Arikidis NS; Costaridou LI
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2020 Jan; 58(1):187-209. PubMed ID: 31813091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Image segmentation feature selection and pattern classification for mammographic microcalcifications.
Fu JC; Lee SK; Wong ST; Yeh JY; Wang AH; Wu HK
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2005 Sep; 29(6):419-29. PubMed ID: 16002263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computer Aided Detection of Clustered Microcalcification: A Survey.
Kumar MNA; Kumar MNA; Sheshadri HS
Curr Med Imaging Rev; 2019; 15(2):132-149. PubMed ID: 31975660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Topological modeling and classification of mammographic microcalcification clusters.
Chen Z; Strange H; Oliver A; Denton ER; Boggis C; Zwiggelaar R
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2015 Apr; 62(4):1203-14. PubMed ID: 25546849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Characterization of clustered microcalcifications in digitized mammograms using neural networks and support vector machines.
Papadopoulos A; Fotiadis DI; Likas A
Artif Intell Med; 2005 Jun; 34(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 15894178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast cancer diagnosis: analyzing texture of tissue surrounding microcalcifications.
Karahaliou AN; Boniatis IS; Skiadopoulos SG; Sakellaropoulos FN; Arikidis NS; Likaki EA; Panayiotakis GS; Costaridou LI
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2008 Nov; 12(6):731-8. PubMed ID: 19000952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating geodesic active contours in microcalcifications segmentation on mammograms.
Duarte MA; Alvarenga AV; Azevedo CM; Calas MJ; Infantosi AF; Pereira WC
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2015 Dec; 122(3):304-15. PubMed ID: 26363676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computer aided detection of clusters of microcalcifications on full field digital mammograms.
Ge J; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Chan HP; Wei J; Helvie MA; Zhou C
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2975-88. PubMed ID: 16964876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improvement of mammographic mass characterization using spiculation meausures and morphological features.
Sahiner B; Chan HP; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Hadjiiski LM
Med Phys; 2001 Jul; 28(7):1455-65. PubMed ID: 11488579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
