BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26429261)

  • 1. Induced magnetic moment in stainless steel components of orthodontic appliances in 1.5 T MRI scanners.
    Wang ZJ; Rollins NK; Liang H; Park YJ
    Med Phys; 2015 Oct; 42(10):5871-8. PubMed ID: 26429261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of orthodontic appliances on the quality of craniofacial anatomical magnetic resonance imaging and real-time speech imaging.
    Wylezinska M; Pinkstone M; Hay N; Scott AD; Birch MJ; Miquel ME
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Dec; 37(6):610-7. PubMed ID: 25667040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of orthodontic appliance-derived artifacts on 3-T MRI movies.
    Ozawa E; Honda EI; Parakonthun KN; Ohmori H; Shimazaki K; Kurabayashi T; Ono T
    Prog Orthod; 2018 Feb; 19(1):7. PubMed ID: 29457192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Magnetic resonance imaging artefacts and fixed orthodontic attachments.
    Beau A; Bossard D; Gebeile-Chauty S
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Feb; 37(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 24997025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Magnetic resonance imaging artefacts and fixed orthodontic attachments].
    Beau A; Bossard D; Gebeile-Chauty S
    Orthod Fr; 2017 Jun; 88(2):131-138. PubMed ID: 28597834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. MRI compatibility of orthodontic brackets and wires: systematic review article.
    Dobai A; Dembrovszky F; Vízkelety T; Barsi P; Juhász F; Dobó-Nagy C
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Jul; 22(1):298. PubMed ID: 35854295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Frictional resistance of ceramic and stainless steel orthodontic brackets.
    Pratten DH; Popli K; Germane N; Gunsolley JC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Nov; 98(5):398-403. PubMed ID: 2239837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of a common stainless steel orthodontic bracket on the diagnostic quality of cranial and cervical 3T- MR images: a prospective, case-control study.
    Cassetta M; Pranno N; Stasolla A; Orsogna N; Fierro D; Cavallini C; Cantisani V
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Aug; 46(6):20170051. PubMed ID: 28452576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of orthodontic appliances on the diagnostic quality of magnetic resonance images of the head.
    Zhylich D; Krishnan P; Muthusami P; Rayner T; Shroff M; Doria A; Tompson B; Lou W; Suri S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Mar; 151(3):484-499. PubMed ID: 28257733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparative study of frictional forces between orthodontic brackets and arch wires.
    Bednar JR; Gruendeman GW; Sandrik JL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Dec; 100(6):513-22. PubMed ID: 1962604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of friction between edgewise stainless steel brackets and orthodontic wires of four alloys.
    Kapila S; Angolkar PV; Duncanson MG; Nanda RS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Aug; 98(2):117-26. PubMed ID: 2378317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of orthodontic brackets and different wires on radiofrequency heating and magnetic field interactions during 3-T MRI.
    Görgülü S; Ayyildiz S; Kamburoglu K; Gökçe S; Ozen T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(2):20130356. PubMed ID: 24257741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correcting B
    Wang ZJ; Park YJ; Morriss MC; Seo Y; Nguyen T; Hallac RR; Nava A; Chopra R; Chatzinoff Y; Price K; Rollins NK
    Sci Rep; 2018 Apr; 8(1):5706. PubMed ID: 29632343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Coefficients of friction for arch wires in stainless steel and polycrystalline alumina bracket slots. I. The dry state.
    Kusy RP; Whitley JQ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Oct; 98(4):300-12. PubMed ID: 2220691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Frictional resistances using Teflon-coated ligatures with various bracket-archwire combinations.
    De Franco DJ; Spiller RE; von Fraunhofer JA
    Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(1):63-72; discussion 73-4. PubMed ID: 7726464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of orthodontic appliances on the diagnostic capability of magnetic resonance imaging in the head and neck region: A systematic review.
    Hasanin M; Kaplan SEF; Hohlen B; Lai C; Nagshabandi R; Zhu X; Al-Jewair T
    Int Orthod; 2019 Sep; 17(3):403-414. PubMed ID: 31285157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the effect of bracket and archwire composition on frictional forces in the buccal segments.
    Nair SV; Padmanabhan R; Janardhanam P
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 22945710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Composition and in vitro corrosion of orthodontic appliances.
    Grimsdottir MR; Gjerdet NR; Hensten-Pettersen A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Jun; 101(6):525-32. PubMed ID: 1350883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of receiver bandwidth on MRI artifacts caused by orthodontic brackets composed of different alloys.
    Abdala-Junior R; No-Cortes J; Arita ES; Ackerman JL; da Silva RLB; Kim JH; Cortes ARG
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2021 Dec; 51(4):413-419. PubMed ID: 34988002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of orthodontic brackets and permanent retainers on the diagnostic image quality of MRI scans: A preliminary study.
    Neela PK; Tatikonda VK; Syed MW; Mamillapalli PK; Sesham VM; Keesara S
    Dent Med Probl; 2021; 58(4):499-508. PubMed ID: 34905303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.