214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26429261)
21. Numeric modeling of torque capabilities of self-ligating and conventional brackets.
Huang Y; Keilig L; Rahimi A; Reimann S; Eliades T; Jäger A; Bourauel C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Nov; 136(5):638-43. PubMed ID: 19892278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A review and evaluation of orthodontic brackets, molar bands and orthodontic auxiliaries during orthognathic surgery: A prospective cohort study.
van Ommeren RM; van Riet TC; Ho JT; Jonkman RE; Becking AG
J Orthod; 2024 Mar; 51(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 37462079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluating the effects of orthodontic materials, field of view, and artifact reduction mode on accuracy of CBCT-based caries detection.
Isman O; Aktan AM; Ertas ET
Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Jul; 24(7):2487-2496. PubMed ID: 31811495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Its Effects on Metallic Brackets and Wires: Does It Alter the Temperature and Bonding Efficacy of Orthodontic Devices?
Sfondrini MF; Preda L; Calliada F; Carbone L; Lungarotti L; Bernardinelli L; Gandini P; Scribante A
Materials (Basel); 2019 Nov; 12(23):. PubMed ID: 31801202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The friction and wear patterns of orthodontic brackets and archwires in the dry state.
Michelberger DJ; Eadie RL; Faulkner MG; Glover KE; Prasad NG; Major PW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Dec; 118(6):662-74. PubMed ID: 11113802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Investigation into the effects of stainless steel ligature ties on the mechanical characteristics of conventional and self-ligated brackets subjected to torque.
Al Fakir H; Carey JP; Melenka GW; Nobes DS; Heo G; Major PW
J Orthod; 2014 Sep; 41(3):188-200. PubMed ID: 24596162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A Quantitative Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Metal Artifact Reduction Algorithm in Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Images with Stainless Steel Orthodontic Brackets and Arch Wires: An Ex Vivo Study.
Shavakhi M; Soltani P; Aghababaee G; Patini R; Armogida NG; Spagnuolo G; Valletta A
Diagnostics (Basel); 2024 Jan; 14(2):. PubMed ID: 38248036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Biodegradation of orthodontic appliances. Part I. Biodegradation of nickel and chromium in vitro.
Barrett RD; Bishara SE; Quinn JK
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Jan; 103(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 8422037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Actual versus theoretical torsional play in conventional and self-ligating bracket systems.
Dalstra M; Eriksen H; Bergamini C; Melsen B
J Orthod; 2015 Jun; 42(2):103-13. PubMed ID: 25588827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The influence of bracket design on moment production during axial rotation.
Bednar JR; Gruendeman GW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Sep; 104(3):254-61. PubMed ID: 8362787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Force systems in the initial phase of orthodontic treatment -- a comparison of different leveling arch wires.
Fuck LM; Drescher D
J Orofac Orthop; 2006 Jan; 67(1):6-18. PubMed ID: 16447020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Influence of common orthodontic appliances on the diagnostic quality of cranial magnetic resonance images.
Elison JM; Leggitt VL; Thomson M; Oyoyo U; Wycliffe ND
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Oct; 134(4):563-72. PubMed ID: 18929275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A comparative study of metal artifacts from common metal orthodontic brackets in magnetic resonance imaging.
Dalili Kajan Z; Khademi J; Alizadeh A; Babaei Hemmaty Y; Atrkar Roushan Z
Imaging Sci Dent; 2015 Sep; 45(3):159-68. PubMed ID: 26389058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Influence of angulation on the resistance to sliding in fixed appliances.
Articolo LC; Kusy RP
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Jan; 115(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 9878956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A quantitative AFM analysis of nano-scale surface roughness in various orthodontic brackets.
Lee GJ; Park KH; Park YG; Park HK
Micron; 2010 Oct; 41(7):775-82. PubMed ID: 20646928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Frictional resistances of different bracket-wire combinations.
Kapur Wadhwa R; Kwon HK; Close JM
Aust Orthod J; 2004 May; 20(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 15233584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Biomechanical analysis of orthodontic brackets with different closing mechanisms].
Morina E; Keilig L; Jäger A; Bourauel C
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2009 Apr; 54(2):89-97. PubMed ID: 19335123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Ultrastructural effect of self-ligating bracket materials on stainless steel and superelastic NiTi wire surfaces.
Choi S; Lee S; Cheong Y; Park KH; Park HK; Park YG
Microsc Res Tech; 2012 Aug; 75(8):1076-83. PubMed ID: 22419658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. In vitro friction of stainless steel arch wire-bracket combinations in air and different aqueous solutions.
Al-Khatib S; Berradja A; Celis JP; Willems G
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2005 May; 8(2):96-105. PubMed ID: 15888122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effect of MRI on the mechanical properties of stainless steel orthodontic wires.
Oshagh M; Hematian MR; Shahidi S; Feizi N; Bayani F; Pishbin L
World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):e72-7. PubMed ID: 21490992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
