214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26429261)
41. Predictability of magnetic susceptibility artifacts from metallic orthodontic appliances in magnetic resonance imaging.
Blankenstein F; Truong BT; Thomas A; Thieme N; Zachriat C
J Orofac Orthop; 2015 Jan; 76(1):14-29. PubMed ID: 25420942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Changes in bracket slot tolerance following recycling of direct-bond metallic orthodontic appliances.
Hixson ME; Brantley WA; Pincsak JJ; Conover JP
Am J Orthod; 1982 Jun; 81(6):447-54. PubMed ID: 6758602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Orthodontic appliances and MR image artefacts: An exploratory in vitro and in vivo study using 1.5-T and 3-T scanners.
Sonesson M; Al-Qabandi F; Månsson S; Abdulraheem S; Bondemark L; Hellén-Halme K
Imaging Sci Dent; 2021 Mar; 51(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 33828963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. In vitro surface corrosion of stainless steel and NiTi orthodontic appliances.
Shin JS; Oh KT; Hwang CJ
Aust Orthod J; 2003 Apr; 19(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 12790351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Measurements of the torque moment in various archwire-bracket-ligation combinations.
Hirai M; Nakajima A; Kawai N; Tanaka E; Igarashi Y; Sakaguchi M; Sameshima GT; Shimizu N
Eur J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 34(3):374-80. PubMed ID: 21571875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Effects of brackets and ties on stiffness of an arch wire.
Adams DM; Powers JM; Asgar K
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 Feb; 91(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 3468796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Time efficiency of self-ligating vs conventional brackets in orthodontics: effect of appliances and ligating systems.
Paduano S; Cioffi I; Iodice G; Rapuano A; Silva R
Prog Orthod; 2008; 9(2):74-80. PubMed ID: 19350061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Reduction of biofilm on orthodontic brackets with the use of a polytetrafluoroethylene coating.
Demling A; Elter C; Heidenblut T; Bach FW; Hahn A; Schwestka-Polly R; Stiesch M; Heuer W
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Aug; 32(4):414-8. PubMed ID: 20139131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. The timing of significant arch dimensional changes with fixed orthodontic appliances: data from a multicenter randomised controlled trial.
Fleming PS; Lee RT; Mcdonald T; Pandis N; Johal A
J Dent; 2014 Jan; 42(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 24269833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Measurement of friction forces between stainless steel wires and "reduced-friction" self-ligating brackets.
Reznikov N; Har-Zion G; Barkana I; Abed Y; Redlich M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):330-8. PubMed ID: 20816303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. An in vitro study into the efficacy of complex tooth alignment with conventional and self-ligating brackets.
Montasser MA; Keilig L; Bourauel C
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 Feb; 18(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 25264808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Magnetic permeability as a predictor of the artefact size caused by orthodontic appliances at 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging.
Blankenstein FH; Asbach P; Beuer F; Glienke J; Mayer S; Zachriat C
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Jan; 21(1):281-289. PubMed ID: 26984824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Enamel abrasion from ceramic orthodontic brackets under an artificial oral environment.
Viazis AD; DeLong R; Bevis RR; Rudney JD; Pintado MR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Aug; 98(2):103-9. PubMed ID: 2378315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The shear bond strengths of stainless steel orthodontic brackets bonded to teeth with orthodontic composite resin and various fissure sealants.
Joseph VP; Rossouw PE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Jul; 98(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 2194391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Common orthodontic appliances cause artifacts that degrade the diagnostic quality of CBCT images.
Sanders MA; Hoyjberg C; Chu CB; Leggitt VL; Kim JS
J Calif Dent Assoc; 2007 Dec; 35(12):850-7. PubMed ID: 18240748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Comparative evaluation of frictional forces in active and passive self-ligating brackets with various archwire alloys.
Krishnan M; Kalathil S; Abraham KM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Nov; 136(5):675-82. PubMed ID: 19892284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Force levels in complex tooth alignment with conventional and self-ligating brackets.
Montasser MA; El-Bialy T; Keilig L; Reimann S; Jäger A; Bourauel C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Apr; 143(4):507-14. PubMed ID: 23561412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Evaluation of frictional forces during dental alignment: an experimental model with 3 nonleveled brackets.
Matarese G; Nucera R; Militi A; Mazza M; Portelli M; Festa F; Cordasco G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 May; 133(5):708-15. PubMed ID: 18456144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Forces in the presence of ceramic versus stainless steel brackets with unconventional vs conventional ligatures.
Baccetti T; Franchi L; Camporesi M
Angle Orthod; 2008 Jan; 78(1):120-4. PubMed ID: 18193950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. A comparison of friction resistance for Nitinol and stainless steel wire in edgewise brackets.
Peterson L; Spencer R; Andreasen G
Quintessence Int Dent Dig; 1982 May; 13(5):563-71. PubMed ID: 6956941
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
