These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26430298)

  • 1. Comparative clinical evaluation of the efficacy of a new method for caries diagnosis and excavation.
    Peskersoy C; Turkun M; Onal B
    J Conserv Dent; 2015; 18(5):364-8. PubMed ID: 26430298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fluorescence-aided caries excavation (FACE), caries detector, and conventional caries excavation in primary teeth.
    Lennon AM; Attin T; Martens S; Buchalla W
    Pediatr Dent; 2009; 31(4):316-9. PubMed ID: 19722440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficiency of 4 caries excavation methods compared.
    Lennon AM; Buchalla W; Rassner B; Becker K; Attin T
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(5):551-5. PubMed ID: 17024942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantity of remaining bacteria and cavity size after excavation with FACE, caries detector dye and conventional excavation in vitro.
    Lennon AM; Attin T; Buchalla W
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(3):236-41. PubMed ID: 17555174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microhardness and shear bond-strength of carious dentin after fluorescence-aided or conventionally excavation: (An
    Koç-Vural U; Ergin E; Gurgan S
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2018 Jul; 10(7):e668-e672. PubMed ID: 30057709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fluorescence-aided caries excavation (FACE) compared to conventional method.
    Lennon AM
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(4):341-5. PubMed ID: 12877417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficiency of the polymer bur SmartPrep compared with conventional tungsten carbide bud bur in dentin caries excavation.
    Dammaschke T; Rodenberg TN; Schäfer E; Ott KH
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(2):256-60. PubMed ID: 16827030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dentine microhardness after different methods for detection and removal of carious dentine tissue.
    Mollica FB; Rocha Gomes Torres C; Gonçalves SE; Mancini MN
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2012; 20(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 23032207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The use of computer-assisted FACE for minimal-invasive caries excavation.
    Ganter P; Al-Ahmad A; Wrbas KT; Hellwig E; Altenburger MJ
    Clin Oral Investig; 2014 Apr; 18(3):745-51. PubMed ID: 23828194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy of Stepwise Caries Excavation vs Indirect Pulp Capping in Preserving the Vitality of Deep Carious Lesions in Permanent Teeth of Pediatric Patients: An
    Manhas S; Pandit IK; Gugnani N; Gupta M
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2020; 13(Suppl 1):S92-S97. PubMed ID: 34434021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Microindentation hardness and calcium/phosphorus ratio of dentin following excavation of dental caries lesions with different techniques.
    Katirci G; Ermis RB
    Springerplus; 2016; 5(1):1641. PubMed ID: 27722059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance of laser fluorescence for residual caries detection in primary teeth.
    Gurbuz T; Yilmaz Y; Sengul F
    Eur J Dent; 2008 Jul; 2(3):176-84. PubMed ID: 19212544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is Fluorescence Technology a Promising Tool for Detecting Infected Dentin in Deep Carious Lesions?
    Trippe LH; Ribeiro AA; Azcarate-Peril MA; Preisser JS; Wang R; Zandona AF
    Caries Res; 2020; 54(3):205-217. PubMed ID: 32580204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of two different methods of detecting residual caries.
    Koç Vural U; Kütük ZB; Ergin E; Yalçın Çakır F; Gürgan S
    Restor Dent Endod; 2017 Feb; 42(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 28194364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The relationship between the color of carious dentin stained with a caries detector dye and bacterial infection.
    Iwami Y; Shimizu A; Narimatsu M; Kinomoto Y; Ebisu S
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 15765962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of laser fluorescence for differentiating caries dye-stainable versus caries dye-unstainable dentin in carious lesions.
    Boston DW; Sauble JE
    Am J Dent; 2005 Dec; 18(6):351-4. PubMed ID: 16433406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microbiological assessment of dentin stained with a caries detector dye.
    Zacharia MA; Munshi AK
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1995; 19(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 7577728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of a new caries detecting dye for primary and permanent carious dentin.
    Hosoya Y; Taguchi T; Tay FR
    J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):137-43. PubMed ID: 16945461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. MicroCT-based comparison between fluorescence-aided caries excavation and conventional excavation.
    Lai G; Kaisarly D; Xu X; Kunzelmann KH
    Am J Dent; 2014 Feb; 27(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 24902399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The in vitro performance of laser fluorescence and caries-detector dye for detecting residual carious dentin during tooth preparation.
    Yazici AR; Baseren M; Gokalp S
    Quintessence Int; 2005 Jun; 36(6):417-22. PubMed ID: 15954247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.