BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26430599)

  • 1. The Relationship between Preoperative Expectations and the Short-Term Postoperative Satisfaction and Functional Outcome in Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review.
    Ellis DJ; Mallozzi SS; Mathews JE; Moss IL; Ouellet JA; Jarzem P; Weber MH
    Global Spine J; 2015 Oct; 5(5):436-52. PubMed ID: 26430599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relationship between preoperative expectations, satisfaction, and functional outcomes in patients undergoing lumbar and cervical spine surgery: a multicenter study.
    Soroceanu A; Ching A; Abdu W; McGuire K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jan; 37(2):E103-8. PubMed ID: 21629159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating the correlation and responsiveness of patient-reported pain with function and quality-of-life outcomes after spine surgery.
    DeVine J; Norvell DC; Ecker E; Fourney DR; Vaccaro A; Wang J; Andersson G
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Oct; 36(21 Suppl):S69-74. PubMed ID: 21897347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
    Haro H; Maekawa S; Hamada Y
    Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predictive outcome factors in the young patient treated with lumbar disc herniation surgery.
    Strömqvist F; Strömqvist B; Jönsson B; Gerdhem P; Karlsson MK
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Oct; 25(4):448-455. PubMed ID: 27203813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales.
    Copay AG; Glassman SD; Subach BR; Berven S; Schuler TC; Carreon LY
    Spine J; 2008; 8(6):968-74. PubMed ID: 18201937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comprehensive study of back and leg pain improvements after adult spinal deformity surgery: analysis of 421 patients with 2-year follow-up and of the impact of the surgery on treatment satisfaction.
    Scheer JK; Smith JS; Clark AJ; Lafage V; Kim HJ; Rolston JD; Eastlack R; Hart RA; Protopsaltis TS; Kelly MP; Kebaish K; Gupta M; Klineberg E; Hostin R; Shaffrey CI; Schwab F; Ames CP;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 May; 22(5):540-53. PubMed ID: 25700238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of complications within 90 days on patient-reported outcomes 3 months and 12 months following elective surgery for lumbar degenerative disease.
    Chotai S; Parker SL; Sivaganesan A; Sielatycki JA; Asher AL; McGirt MJ; Devin CJ
    Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Dec; 39(6):E8. PubMed ID: 26621422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of depression symptoms on patient expectations and clinical outcomes in the surgical management of spinal stenosis.
    Urban-Baeza A; Zárate-Kalfópulos B; Romero-Vargas S; Obil-Chavarría C; Brenes-Rojas L; Reyes-Sánchez A
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Jan; 22(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 25380536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving postoperative patient reported benefits and satisfaction following spinal fusion with a single preoperative education session.
    Eastwood D; Manson N; Bigney E; Darling M; Richardson E; Paixao R; Underwood T; Ellis K; Abraham E
    Spine J; 2019 May; 19(5):840-845. PubMed ID: 30471460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patients' expectations of spine surgery for degenerative conditions: results from the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN).
    Canizares M; Gleenie RA; Perruccio AV; Abraham E; Ahn H; Attabib N; Christie S; Johnson MG; Nataraj A; Nicholls F; Paquet J; Phan P; Rasoulinejad P; Manson N; Hall H; Thomas K; Fisher CG; Rampersaud YR
    Spine J; 2020 Mar; 20(3):399-408. PubMed ID: 31605790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of preoperative diagnosis on patient satisfaction following lumbar spine surgery.
    Crawford CH; Carreon LY; Bydon M; Asher AL; Glassman SD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Jun; 26(6):709-715. PubMed ID: 28338454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bilateral versus unilateral interlaminar approach for bilateral decompression in patients with single-level degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a multicenter retrospective study of 175 patients on postoperative pain, functional disability, and patient satisfaction.
    den Boogert HF; Keers JC; Marinus Oterdoom DL; Kuijlen JM
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Sep; 23(3):326-35. PubMed ID: 26091439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prediction model for outcome after low-back surgery: individualized likelihood of complication, hospital readmission, return to work, and 12-month improvement in functional disability.
    McGirt MJ; Sivaganesan A; Asher AL; Devin CJ
    Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Dec; 39(6):E13. PubMed ID: 26621411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does a relationship exist between preoperative expectations and overall satisfaction in spine surgery patients?-a prospective cohort study.
    Silver J; Mallozzi S; Kia C; O'Sullivan M; Cote M; Moss I
    J Spine Surg; 2023 Dec; 9(4):444-453. PubMed ID: 38196727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preoperative Zung depression scale predicts patient satisfaction independent of the extent of improvement after revision lumbar surgery.
    Adogwa O; Parker SL; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; Bydon A; Cheng JS; Asher AL; McGirt MJ
    Spine J; 2013 May; 13(5):501-6. PubMed ID: 23422730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patients' satisfaction with provided care/information and expectations on clinical outcome after lumbar disc herniation surgery.
    Rönnberg K; Lind B; Zoëga B; Halldin K; Gellerstedt M; Brisby H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jan; 32(2):256-61. PubMed ID: 17224823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determining the quality and effectiveness of surgical spine care: patient satisfaction is not a valid proxy.
    Godil SS; Parker SL; Zuckerman SL; Mendenhall SK; Devin CJ; Asher AL; McGirt MJ
    Spine J; 2013 Sep; 13(9):1006-12. PubMed ID: 23685216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of spine surgery outcomes: inconsistency of change amongst outcome measurements.
    Copay AG; Martin MM; Subach BR; Carreon LY; Glassman SD; Schuler TC; Berven S
    Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):291-6. PubMed ID: 20171937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exploring the expectation-actuality discrepancy: a systematic review of the impact of preoperative expectations on satisfaction and patient reported outcomes in spinal surgery.
    Witiw CD; Mansouri A; Mathieu F; Nassiri F; Badhiwala JH; Fessler RG
    Neurosurg Rev; 2018 Jan; 41(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 27053222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.