These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2643067)

  • 21. Twins and triplets: the effect of plurality and growth on neonatal outcome compared with singleton infants.
    Garite TJ; Clark RH; Elliott JP; Thorp JA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Sep; 191(3):700-7. PubMed ID: 15467528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Determination of gestational age by ultrasound].
    Karásková I; Kravka A
    Cesk Gynekol; 1990 Aug; 55(7):481-6. PubMed ID: 2225096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Perinatal results in pregnancies obtained with embryo transfer in vitro fertilization: a case-control study].
    Barros Delgadillo JC; Alvarado Méndez LM; Gorbea Chávez V; Villalobos Acosta S; Sánchez Solís V; Gaviño Gaviño F
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2006 Dec; 74(12):626-39. PubMed ID: 17539318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Assessing gestational age.
    Smith GN; Frey KA; Johnson TR
    Am Fam Physician; 1986 Feb; 33(2):215-20. PubMed ID: 3511646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A triplet pregnancy after in vitro fertilization is a procedure-related complication that should be prevented by replacement of two embryos only.
    Roest J; van Heusden AM; Verhoeff A; Mous HV; Zeilmaker GH
    Fertil Steril; 1997 Feb; 67(2):290-5. PubMed ID: 9022605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Fetal foot length: relationship to menstrual age and fetal measurements in the second trimester.
    Platt LD; Medearis AL; DeVore GR; Horenstein JM; Carlson DE; Brar HS
    Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Apr; 71(4):526-31. PubMed ID: 3353042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Growth discordancy in twin pregnancies: a risk factor not detected by measurements of biparietal diameter.
    Erkkola R; Ala-Mello S; Piiroinen O; Kero P; Sillanpää M
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Aug; 66(2):203-6. PubMed ID: 3895071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Last menstrual period provides the best estimate of gestation length for women in rural Guatemala.
    Neufeld LM; Haas JD; Grajéda R; Martorell R
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2006 Jul; 20(4):290-8. PubMed ID: 16879501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Underestimation of gestational age by conventional crown-rump length dating curves.
    MacGregor SN; Tamura RK; Sabbagha RE; Minogue JP; Gibson ME; Hoffman DI
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Sep; 70(3 Pt 1):344-8. PubMed ID: 3306495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Gestational sac diameter in very early pregnancy as a predictor of fetal outcome.
    Oh JS; Wright G; Coulam CB
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Sep; 20(3):267-9. PubMed ID: 12230450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Outcome of first-trimester chorionic villus sampling for genetic investigation in multiple pregnancy.
    Brambati B; Tului L; Guercilena S; Alberti E
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Mar; 17(3):209-16. PubMed ID: 11309169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Intrauterine growth of triplets as estimated from liveborn birth weight data.
    Yuval Y; Seidman DS; Achiron R; Goldenberg M; Alcalay M; Mashiach S; Lipitz S
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Nov; 6(5):345-8. PubMed ID: 8590206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparative analysis of second-trimester ultrasound dating formulae in pregnancies conceived with artificial reproductive techniques.
    Mul T; Mongelli M; Gardosi J
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Dec; 8(6):397-402. PubMed ID: 9014279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Fetal outcome in pregnancies defined as post-term according to the last menstrual period estimate, but not according to the ultrasound estimate.
    Tunón K; Eik-Nes SH; Grøttum P
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jul; 14(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 10461332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Predictive factors for multiple pregnancy in in vitro fertilization.
    Bassil S; Wyns C; Toussaint-Demylle D; Abdelnour W; Donnez J
    J Reprod Med; 1997 Dec; 42(12):761-6. PubMed ID: 9437588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Gestational age in pregnancies after in vitro fertilization: comparison between ultrasound measurement and actual age.
    Wennerholm UB; Bergh C; Hagberg H; Sultan B; Wennergren M
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Sep; 12(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 9793188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Second-trimester assessment of gestational age in twins: validation of singleton biometry charts.
    Dias T; Arcangeli T; Bhide A; Mahsud-Dornan S; Papageorghiou A; Thilaganathan B
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jan; 37(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 20617507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Conceptual age and ultrasound measurements of gestational sac and crown-rump length in in vitro fertilization pregnancies.
    Rossavik IK; Torjusen GO; Gibbons WE
    Fertil Steril; 1988 Jun; 49(6):1012-7. PubMed ID: 3286286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Should a first trimester dating scan be routine for all pregnancies?
    Doubilet PM
    Semin Perinatol; 2013 Oct; 37(5):307-9. PubMed ID: 24176152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The research implications of the selection of a gestational age estimation method.
    Lynch CD; Zhang J
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 21 Suppl 2():86-96. PubMed ID: 17803622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.