These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2643067)

  • 41. A comparison of the ability of a sonographically measured biparietal diameter and the last menstrual period to predict the spontaneous onset of labor.
    Waldenström U; Axelsson O; Nilsson S
    Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Sep; 76(3 Pt 1):336-8. PubMed ID: 2199864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A comparison of sonographic growth curves of triplet and twin fetuses.
    Shushan A; Mordel N; Zajicek G; Lewin A; Schenker JG; Sadovsky E
    Am J Perinatol; 1993 Sep; 10(5):388-91. PubMed ID: 8240601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Early crown-rump length. A good predictor of gestational age.
    Silva PD; Mahairas G; Schaper AM; Schauberger CW
    J Reprod Med; 1990 Jun; 35(6):641-4. PubMed ID: 2193153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Determination of the gestation period by means of ultrasound. Cephalometry in twins (author's transl)].
    Lichtenegger W; Weiss PA; Kömetter R
    Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol; 1978 Apr; 182(2):122-4. PubMed ID: 654391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Gestational age assessment.
    Attico NB; Meyer DJ; Bodin HJ; Dickman DS
    Am Fam Physician; 1990 Feb; 41(2):553-60. PubMed ID: 2405606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [The biparietal fetal diameter during twin and normal pregnancy. An ultrasonographic comparison (author's transl)].
    Göttlicher S; Madjarić J; Krone HA
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1977 Sep; 37(9):762-7. PubMed ID: 914018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The abortion debate: measuring gestational age.
    Santee B; Henshaw SK
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1992; 24(4):172-3. PubMed ID: 1526273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Ultrasound dating at 12-14 or 15-20 weeks of gestation? A prospective cross-validation of established dating formulae in a population of in-vitro fertilized pregnancies randomized to early or late dating scan.
    Saltvedt S; Almström H; Kublickas M; Reilly M; Valentin L; Grunewald C
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 24(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 15229915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. OS083. Fetal growth and maternal vascular function in early pregnancy.
    Iacobaeus C; Jörneskog G; Kahan T; Thorsell M; Andolf E
    Pregnancy Hypertens; 2012 Jul; 2(3):223. PubMed ID: 26105298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Reliability factors of delivery due dates.
    Naeye RL
    J Reprod Med; 1979 Mar; 22(3):148-50. PubMed ID: 439089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. First trimester interfetal size variation in well-dated multifetal pregnancies.
    Isada NB; Sorokin Y; Drugan A; Johnson MP; Zador I; Evans MI
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 1992; 7(2):82-6. PubMed ID: 1503653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Prediction of neonatal crown-heel length in normal singletons, twins, and triplets using individualized growth assessment.
    Milner LL; Deter RL; Hill RM; Hegemier S; Hata T; Stefos T
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1994 May; 22(4):253-6. PubMed ID: 8006184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Determination of birth date by early ultrasonography].
    Børdahl E; Moe N
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1992 Jun; 112(16):2112-3. PubMed ID: 1523636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Third-trimester ultrasound dating algorithms derived from pregnancies conceived with artificial reproductive techniques.
    Mongelli M; Chew S; Yuxin NG; Biswas A
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Aug; 26(2):129-31. PubMed ID: 16041677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Determination of birth term by early ultrasonic examination--wrong, wrong and wrong again?].
    Bratlid D
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1991 Apr; 111(11):1379-81. PubMed ID: 2042162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Does a discrepancy between gestational age determined by biparietal diameter and last menstrual period sometimes signify early intrauterine growth retardation?
    Larsen T; Nguyen TH; Greisen G; Engholm G; Møller H
    BJOG; 2000 Feb; 107(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 10688508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Problems in ultrasonic monitoring of multiple pregnancies.
    Milne B
    Br J Radiol; 1980 Feb; 53(626):85-6. PubMed ID: 7370515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Accuracy of ultrasound dating formulae in the late second-trimester in pregnancies conceived with in-vitro fertilization.
    Mongelli M; Yuxin NG; Biswas A; Chew S
    Acta Radiol; 2003 Jul; 44(4):452-5. PubMed ID: 12846699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Sonographic dating of pregnancies among women with menstrual irregularities.
    Waldenström U; Axelsson O; Nilsson S
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1991; 70(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 1858490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Improving the accuracy of fetal foot length to confirm gestational duration.
    Drey EA; Kang MS; McFarland W; Darney PD
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):773-8. PubMed ID: 15802404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.