These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26431043)

  • 1. Envelope Interactions in Multi-Channel Amplitude Modulation Frequency Discrimination by Cochlear Implant Users.
    Galvin JJ; Oba SI; Başkent D; Chatterjee M; Fu QJ
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0139546. PubMed ID: 26431043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modulation frequency discrimination with single and multiple channels in cochlear implant users.
    Galvin JJ; Oba S; Başkent D; Fu QJ
    Hear Res; 2015 Jun; 324():7-18. PubMed ID: 25746914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relationship Between Peripheral and Psychophysical Measures of Amplitude Modulation Detection in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Tejani VD; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e268-e284. PubMed ID: 28207576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A method to dynamically control unwanted loudness cues when measuring amplitude modulation detection in cochlear implant users.
    Galvin JJ; Fu QJ; Oba S; Başkent D
    J Neurosci Methods; 2014 Jan; 222():207-12. PubMed ID: 24269251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speech recognition and temporal amplitude modulation processing by Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.
    Luo X; Fu QJ; Wei CG; Cao KL
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):957-70. PubMed ID: 18818548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Frequency modulation detection with simultaneous amplitude modulation by cochlear implant users.
    Luo X; Fu QJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1046-54. PubMed ID: 17672652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Single- and multi-channel modulation detection in cochlear implant users.
    Galvin JJ; Oba S; Fu QJ; Başkent D
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e99338. PubMed ID: 24918605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Psychoacoustic and electroencephalographic responses to changes in amplitude modulation depth and frequency in relation to speech recognition in cochlear implantees.
    Aldag N; Nogueira W
    Sci Rep; 2024 Apr; 14(1):8181. PubMed ID: 38589483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. New parallel stimulation strategies revisited: effect of synchronous multi electrode stimulation on rate discrimination in cochlear implant users.
    Bahmer A; Baumann U
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Jun; 14(3):142-9. PubMed ID: 22733121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pitch and loudness matching of unmodulated and modulated stimuli in cochlear implantees.
    Vandali A; Sly D; Cowan R; van Hoesel R
    Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 302():32-49. PubMed ID: 23685148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of spectral and temporal cues in voice gender discrimination by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.
    Fu QJ; Chinchilla S; Galvin JJ
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2004 Sep; 5(3):253-60. PubMed ID: 15492884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Channel Interaction and Current Level Affect Across-Electrode Integration of Interaural Time Differences in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners.
    Egger K; Majdak P; Laback B
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2016 Feb; 17(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 26377826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modulation Depth Discrimination by Cochlear Implant Users.
    Monaghan JJM; Carlyon RP; Deeks JM
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2022 Apr; 23(2):285-299. PubMed ID: 35080684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multichannel place pitch sensitivity in cochlear implant recipients.
    Laneau J; Wouters J
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2004 Sep; 5(3):285-94. PubMed ID: 15148651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Loudness growth in cochlear implants: effect of stimulation rate and electrode configuration.
    Fu QJ
    Hear Res; 2005 Apr; 202(1-2):55-62. PubMed ID: 15811699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spectral modulation detection and vowel and consonant identifications in cochlear implant listeners.
    Saoji AA; Litvak L; Spahr AJ; Eddins DA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):955-8. PubMed ID: 19739707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech perception with interaction-compensated simultaneous stimulation and long pulse durations in cochlear implant users.
    Schatzer R; Koroleva I; Griessner A; Levin S; Kusovkov V; Yanov Y; Zierhofer C
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():99-106. PubMed ID: 25457654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Amplitude Modulation Detection and Speech Recognition in Late-Implanted Prelingually and Postlingually Deafened Cochlear Implant Users.
    De Ruiter AM; Debruyne JA; Chenault MN; Francart T; Brokx JP
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):557-66. PubMed ID: 25851075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of stimulus duration on amplitude modulation processing with cochlear implants.
    Luo X; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Feb; 127(2):EL23-9. PubMed ID: 20136174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Within- and across-channel gap detection in cochlear implant listeners.
    Grose JH; Buss E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Dec; 122(6):3651-8. PubMed ID: 18247772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.