These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2643122)

  • 1. Back support mechanisms during manual lifting.
    Sullivan MS
    Phys Ther; 1989 Jan; 69(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 2643122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An on-body personal lift augmentation device (PLAD) reduces EMG amplitude of erector spinae during lifting tasks.
    Abdoli-E M; Agnew MJ; Stevenson JM
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Jun; 21(5):456-65. PubMed ID: 16494978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of voluntary diaphragmatic activation on back lifting.
    Wedin S; Leanderson R; Knutsson E
    Scand J Rehabil Med; 1988; 20(3):129-32. PubMed ID: 3187465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intra-abdominal pressure and trunk muscle activity during lifting. II. Chronic low-back patients.
    Hemborg B; Moritz U
    Scand J Rehabil Med; 1985; 17(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 3159083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intra-abdominal pressure and trunk muscle activity during lifting. IV. The causal factors of the intra-abdominal pressure rise.
    Hemborg B; Moritz U; Löwing H
    Scand J Rehabil Med; 1985; 17(1):25-38. PubMed ID: 3159082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of mental processing on low back load while lifting an object.
    Katsuhira J; Matsudaira K; Iwakiri K; Kimura Y; Ohashi T; Ono R; Sugita S; Fukuda K; Abe S; Maruyama H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jun; 38(13):E832-9. PubMed ID: 23722573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neck posture during lifting and its effect on trunk muscle activation and lumbar spine posture.
    Hlavenka TM; Christner VFK; Gregory DE
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Jul; 62():28-33. PubMed ID: 28411737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Myoelectric activity and sequencing of selected trunk muscles during isokinetic lifting.
    Noe DA; Mostardi RA; Jackson ME; Porterfield JA; Askew MJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1992 Feb; 17(2):225-9. PubMed ID: 1532462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of work experience, lift frequency and exposure duration on low back muscle oxygenation.
    Yang G; Chany AM; Parakkat J; Burr D; Marras WS
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Jan; 22(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 16996665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of wearing a back belt on spine kinematics during asymmetric lifting of large and small boxes.
    Giorcelli RJ; Hughes RE; Wassell JT; Hsiao H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Aug; 26(16):1794-8. PubMed ID: 11493853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electromyographic analysis of two techniques for squat lifting.
    Delitto RS; Rose SJ; Apts DW
    Phys Ther; 1987 Sep; 67(9):1329-34. PubMed ID: 2957703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using verbal instructions to influence lifting mechanics - Does the directive "lift with your legs, not your back" attenuate spinal flexion?
    Beach TAC; Stankovic T; Carnegie DR; Micay R; Frost DM
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2018 Feb; 38():1-6. PubMed ID: 29107836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spine loading as a function of lift frequency, exposure duration, and work experience.
    Marras WS; Parakkat J; Chany AM; Yang G; Burr D; Lavender SA
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 May; 21(4):345-52. PubMed ID: 16310299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of volitional spine stabilization on lifting task in recurrent low back pain population.
    Haddas R; Yang J; Lieberman I
    Eur Spine J; 2016 Sep; 25(9):2833-41. PubMed ID: 27160828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An investigation of perceived exertion via whole body exertion and direct muscle force indicators during the determination of the maximum acceptable weight of lift.
    Davis KG; Jorgensen MJ; Marras WS
    Ergonomics; 2000 Feb; 43(2):143-59. PubMed ID: 10675055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Age-related differences do affect postural kinematics and joint kinetics during repetitive lifting.
    Boocock MG; Mawston GA; Taylor S
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2015 Feb; 30(2):136-43. PubMed ID: 25576019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Postural effects on intra-abdominal pressure during Valsalva maneuver.
    Goldish GD; Quast JE; Blow JJ; Kuskowski MA
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1994 Mar; 75(3):324-7. PubMed ID: 8129587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of squat and stoop dynamic liftings: muscle forces and internal spinal loads.
    Bazrgari B; Shirazi-Adl A; Arjmand N
    Eur Spine J; 2007 May; 16(5):687-99. PubMed ID: 17103232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The activity of individual trunk muscles during heavy physical loading.
    Zetterberg C; Andersson GB; Schultz AB
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1987 Dec; 12(10):1035-40. PubMed ID: 2964727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The evaluation of team lifting on physical work demands and workload in ironworkers.
    van der Molen HF; Visser S; Kuijer PP; Faber G; Hoozemans MJ; van Dieën JH; Frings-Dresen MH
    Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():3771-3. PubMed ID: 22317295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.