169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26431476)
1. The Usefulness of Gaze Tracking as an Index of Visual Field Reliability in Glaucoma Patients.
Ishiyama Y; Murata H; Asaoka R
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Oct; 56(11):6233-6. PubMed ID: 26431476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An objective evaluation of gaze tracking in Humphrey perimetry and the relation with the reproducibility of visual fields: a pilot study in glaucoma.
Ishiyama Y; Murata H; Mayama C; Asaoka R
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Nov; 55(12):8149-52. PubMed ID: 25389198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Estimating the Reliability of Glaucomatous Visual Field for the Accurate Assessment of Progression Using the Gaze-Tracking and Reliability Indices.
Asaoka R; Fujino Y; Aoki S; Matsuura M; Murata H
Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2019; 2(2):111-119. PubMed ID: 32672604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimating the Usefulness of Humphrey Perimetry Gaze Tracking for Evaluating Structure-Function Relationship in Glaucoma.
Ishiyama Y; Murata H; Hirasawa H; Asaoka R
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Dec; 56(13):7801-7805. PubMed ID: 26650899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The association between ocular surface measurements with visual field reliability indices and gaze tracking results in preperimetric glaucoma.
Arai T; Murata H; Matsuura M; Usui T; Asaoka R
Br J Ophthalmol; 2018 Apr; 102(4):525-530. PubMed ID: 28765147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Effect of Testing Reliability on Visual Field Sensitivity in Normal Eyes: The Singapore Chinese Eye Study.
Tan NYQ; Tham YC; Koh V; Nguyen DQ; Cheung CY; Aung T; Wong TY; Cheng CY
Ophthalmology; 2018 Jan; 125(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 28863943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Relationship Between Visual Acuity and the Reproducibility of Visual Field Measurements in Glaucoma Patients.
Matsuura M; Hirasawa K; Murata H; Asaoka R
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Aug; 56(9):5630-5. PubMed ID: 26313298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Visual field progression in glaucoma: what is the specificity of the Guided Progression Analysis?
Artes PH; O'Leary N; Nicolela MT; Chauhan BC; Crabb DP
Ophthalmology; 2014 Oct; 121(10):2023-7. PubMed ID: 24878173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evidence-based Criteria for Assessment of Visual Field Reliability.
Yohannan J; Wang J; Brown J; Chauhan BC; Boland MV; Friedman DS; Ramulu PY
Ophthalmology; 2017 Nov; 124(11):1612-1620. PubMed ID: 28676280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Standard Reliability and Gaze Tracking Metrics in Glaucoma and Glaucoma Suspects.
Camp AS; Long CP; Patella VM; Proudfoot JA; Weinreb RN
Am J Ophthalmol; 2022 Feb; 234():91-98. PubMed ID: 34280366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Early Detection of Glaucomatous Visual Field Progression Using Pointwise Linear Regression With Binomial Test in the Central 10 Degrees.
Asano S; Murata H; Matsuura M; Fujino Y; Asaoka R
Am J Ophthalmol; 2019 Mar; 199():140-149. PubMed ID: 30465746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relationship between severity of visual field loss at presentation and rate of visual field progression in glaucoma.
Rao HL; Kumar AU; Babu JG; Senthil S; Garudadri CS
Ophthalmology; 2011 Feb; 118(2):249-53. PubMed ID: 20728941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Role of visual field reliability indices in ruling out glaucoma.
Rao HL; Yadav RK; Begum VU; Addepalli UK; Choudhari NS; Senthil S; Garudadri CS
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Jan; 133(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 25256758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Progression pattern of initial parafoveal scotomas in glaucoma.
Su D; Park SC; Simonson JL; Liebmann JM; Ritch R
Ophthalmology; 2013 Mar; 120(3):520-527. PubMed ID: 23149129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Usefulness of gaze tracking during perimetry in glaucomatous eyes].
Kunimatsu S; Suzuki Y; Shirato S; Araie M
Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1999 Oct; 103(10):748-53. PubMed ID: 10554550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Parafoveal scotoma progression in glaucoma: humphrey 10-2 versus 24-2 visual field analysis.
Park SC; Kung Y; Su D; Simonson JL; Furlanetto RL; Liebmann JM; Ritch R
Ophthalmology; 2013 Aug; 120(8):1546-50. PubMed ID: 23697959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling perimetry for detection of visual-field defects in open-angle glaucoma.
Clement CI; Goldberg I; Healey PR; Graham S
Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 93(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 18669543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clustering visual field test points based on rates of progression to improve the prediction of future damage.
Hirasawa K; Murata H; Hirasawa H; Mayama C; Asaoka R
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Oct; 55(11):7681-5. PubMed ID: 25342611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Applying "Lasso" Regression to Predict Future Glaucomatous Visual Field Progression in the Central 10 Degrees.
Fujino Y; Murata H; Mayama C; Matsuo H; Asaoka R
J Glaucoma; 2017 Feb; 26(2):113-118. PubMed ID: 27811574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Association Between Visual Field Reliability Indices and Cognitive Impairment in Glaucoma Patients.
Raman P; Khy Ching Y; Sivagurunathan PD; Ramli N; Mohd Khalid KH
J Glaucoma; 2019 Aug; 28(8):685-690. PubMed ID: 31033782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
