These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26431620)

  • 1. [Customized and non-customized French intrauterine growth curves. II - Comparison with existing curves and benefits of customization].
    Ego A; Prunet C; Blondel B; Kaminski M; Goffinet F; Zeitlin J
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2016 Feb; 45(2):165-76. PubMed ID: 26431620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Customized and non-customized French intrauterine growth curves. I - Methodology].
    Ego A; Prunet C; Lebreton E; Blondel B; Kaminski M; Goffinet F; Zeitlin J
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2016 Feb; 45(2):155-64. PubMed ID: 26422365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Definitions: small for gestational age and intrauterine growth retardation].
    Ego A
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2013 Dec; 42(8):872-94. PubMed ID: 24210714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Customized and non-customized live-born birth-weight curves of single and uncomplicated pregnancies from the Burgundy perinatal network. Part I - methodology.
    Rousseau T; Durand-Maison O; Labruere-Chazal C; Tabard F; Jebrane A; Martz O; Benzenine E; Cottenet J; Sagot P
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2017 Sep; 46(7):587-590. PubMed ID: 28529058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fetal growth restriction and intra-uterine growth restriction: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians.
    Vayssière C; Sentilhes L; Ego A; Bernard C; Cambourieu D; Flamant C; Gascoin G; Gaudineau A; Grangé G; Houfflin-Debarge V; Langer B; Malan V; Marcorelles P; Nizard J; Perrotin F; Salomon L; Senat MV; Serry A; Tessier V; Truffert P; Tsatsaris V; Arnaud C; Carbonne B
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Oct; 193():10-8. PubMed ID: 26207980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Does customized weight curves improve prenatal diagnosis of fetuses small for gestational age in a high-risk population?].
    Lerebours A; Callec R; Lauria E; Morel O
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2017 Jun; 45(6):335-339. PubMed ID: 28552750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of customization and use of a fetal growth standard on the association between birthweight percentile and adverse perinatal outcome.
    Sovio U; Smith GCS
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 218(2S):S738-S744. PubMed ID: 29199029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Testing the assumptions of customized intrauterine growth charts using national birth studies.
    Hocquette A; Monier I; Blondel B; Dufourg MN; Heude B; Zeitlin J
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2022 Apr; 101(4):405-416. PubMed ID: 35224718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Should parity be included in customised fetal weight standards for identifying small-for-gestational-age babies? Results from a French multicentre study.
    Ego A; Subtil D; Grange G; Thiebaugeorges O; Senat MV; Vayssiere C; Zeitlin J
    BJOG; 2008 Sep; 115(10):1256-64. PubMed ID: 18715411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Prevalence, risk factors, maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality of intrauterine growth restriction and small-for-gestational age].
    Gaudineau A
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2013 Dec; 42(8):895-910. PubMed ID: 24216305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Customized vs INTERGROWTH-21
    Francis A; Hugh O; Gardosi J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 218(2S):S692-S699. PubMed ID: 29422208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the ability of alternative birthweight and fetal weight standards to identify preterm newborns at increased risk of perinatal death.
    Ferdynus C; Quantin C; Abrahamowicz M; Burguet A; Sagot P; Gouyon JB
    BJOG; 2013 Nov; 120(12):1456-64. PubMed ID: 23721356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Unisex vs sex-specific estimated fetal weight charts for fetal growth monitoring: a population-based study.
    Monier I; Ego A; Benachi A; Hocquette A; Blondel B; Goffinet F; Zeitlin J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2022 Jan; 4(1):100527. PubMed ID: 34763120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identification of pathologically small fetuses using customized, ultrasound and population-based growth norms.
    Smith NA; Bukowski R; Thomas AM; Cantonwine D; Zera C; Robinson JN
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Nov; 44(5):595-9. PubMed ID: 24532059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Poor effectiveness of antenatal detection of fetal growth restriction and consequences for obstetric management and neonatal outcomes: a French national study.
    Monier I; Blondel B; Ego A; Kaminiski M; Goffinet F; Zeitlin J
    BJOG; 2015 Mar; 122(4):518-27. PubMed ID: 25346493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does the Presence of Risk Factors for Fetal Growth Restriction Increase the Probability of Antenatal Detection? A French National Study.
    Monier I; Blondel B; Ego A; Kaminski M; Goffinet F; Zeitlin J
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2016 Jan; 30(1):46-55. PubMed ID: 26488771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Comparison of Methods for the Diagnosis of Fetal Growth Restriction Between the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
    Blue NR; Beddow ME; Savabi M; Katukuri VR; Mozurkewich EL; Chao CR
    Obstet Gynecol; 2018 May; 131(5):835-841. PubMed ID: 29630011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. From population reference to national standard: new and improved birthweight charts.
    Hoftiezer L; Hof MHP; Dijs-Elsinga J; Hogeveen M; Hukkelhoven CWPM; van Lingen RA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Apr; 220(4):383.e1-383.e17. PubMed ID: 30576661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of customized and cohort-based birthweight standards in identification of growth-restricted infants in GUSTO cohort study.
    Agarwal P; Rajadurai VS; Yap F; Yeo G; Chong YS; Kwek K; Saw SM; Gluckman PD; Lee YS; ; Tan KH
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(15):2519-22. PubMed ID: 26366791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of customized growth curves on screening for small for gestational age twins.
    Cordiez S; Deruelle P; Drumez E; Bodart S; Subtil D; Houfflin-Debarge V; Garabedian C
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Aug; 215():28-32. PubMed ID: 28600918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.