These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26431644)

  • 1. Relationship inference from the genetic data on parents or offspring: A comparative study.
    Gazal S; Génin E; Leutenegger AL
    Theor Popul Biol; 2016 Feb; 107():31-8. PubMed ID: 26431644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Parent-offspring inference in inbred populations.
    Runge JN; König B; Lindholm AK; Bendesky A
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2022 Nov; 22(8):2981-2993. PubMed ID: 35770342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inference of relationships in population data using identity-by-descent and identity-by-state.
    Stevens EL; Heckenberg G; Roberson ED; Baugher JD; Downey TJ; Pevsner J
    PLoS Genet; 2011 Sep; 7(9):e1002287. PubMed ID: 21966277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Determining the genome-wide kinship coefficient seems unhelpful in distinguishing consanguineous couples with a high versus low risk for adverse reproductive outcome.
    Kelmemi W; Teeuw ME; Bochdanovits Z; Ouburg S; Jonker MA; Alkuraya F; Hashem M; Kayserili H; van Haeringen A; Sheridan E; Masri A; Cobben JM; Rizzu P; Kostense PJ; Dommering CJ; Henneman L; Bouhamed-Chaabouni H; Heutink P; Ten Kate LP; Cornel MC
    BMC Med Genet; 2015 Jul; 16():50. PubMed ID: 26188928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inbreeding coefficient estimation with dense SNP data: comparison of strategies and application to HapMap III.
    Gazal S; Sahbatou M; Perdry H; Letort S; Génin E; Leutenegger AL
    Hum Hered; 2014; 77(1-4):49-62. PubMed ID: 25060269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pedigrees or markers: Which are better in estimating relatedness and inbreeding coefficient?
    Wang J
    Theor Popul Biol; 2016 Feb; 107():4-13. PubMed ID: 26344786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of relationships between pigs based on pedigree and genomic information.
    Zhang J; Song H; Zhang Q; Ding X
    Animal; 2020 Apr; 14(4):697-705. PubMed ID: 31708004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Statistical tests for detection of misspecified relationships by use of genome-screen data.
    McPeek MS; Sun L
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Mar; 66(3):1076-94. PubMed ID: 10712219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fast and Accurate Shared Segment Detection and Relatedness Estimation in Un-phased Genetic Data via TRUFFLE.
    Dimitromanolakis A; Paterson AD; Sun L
    Am J Hum Genet; 2019 Jul; 105(1):78-88. PubMed ID: 31178127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of parental relationships in maximum lod score affected sib-pair method.
    Leutenegger AL; Génin E; Thompson EA; Clerget-Darpoux F
    Genet Epidemiol; 2002 Nov; 23(4):413-25. PubMed ID: 12432507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pedigree reconstruction using identity by descent.
    Kirkpatrick B; Li SC; Karp RM; Halperin E
    J Comput Biol; 2011 Nov; 18(11):1481-93. PubMed ID: 22035331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using identity by descent estimation with dense genotype data to detect positive selection.
    Han L; Abney M
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2013 Feb; 21(2):205-11. PubMed ID: 22781100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficient identification of identical-by-descent status in pedigrees with many untyped individuals.
    Li X; Yin X; Li J
    Bioinformatics; 2010 Jun; 26(12):i191-8. PubMed ID: 20529905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Unexpected relationships and inbreeding in HapMap phase III populations.
    Stevens EL; Baugher JD; Shirley MD; Frelin LP; Pevsner J
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e49575. PubMed ID: 23185369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. RAFFI: Accurate and fast familial relationship inference in large scale biobank studies using RaPID.
    Naseri A; Shi J; Lin X; Zhang S; Zhi D
    PLoS Genet; 2021 Jan; 17(1):e1009315. PubMed ID: 33476339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Identity-by-state-based haplotyping expands the application of comprehensive preimplantation genetic testing.
    Ding J; Dimitriadou E; Tšuiko O; Destouni A; Melotte C; Van Den Bogaert K; Debrock S; Jatsenko T; Esteki MZ; Voet T; Peeraer K; Denayer E; Vermeesch JR
    Hum Reprod; 2020 Mar; 35(3):718-726. PubMed ID: 32198505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the use of dense SNP marker data for the identification of distant relative pairs.
    Sun M; Jobling MA; Taliun D; Pramstaller PP; Egeland T; Sheehan NA
    Theor Popul Biol; 2016 Feb; 107():14-25. PubMed ID: 26474828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Distinguishing pedigree relationships via multi-way identity by descent sharing and sex-specific genetic maps.
    Qiao Y; Sannerud JG; Basu-Roy S; Hayward C; Williams AL
    Am J Hum Genet; 2021 Jan; 108(1):68-83. PubMed ID: 33385324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Epistatic kinship a new measure of genetic diversity for short-term phylogenetic structures--theoretical investigations.
    Flury C; Tietze M; Simianer H
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2006 Jun; 123(3):159-71. PubMed ID: 16706920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improved estimation of inbreeding and kinship in pigs using optimized SNP panels.
    Lopes MS; Silva FF; Harlizius B; Duijvesteijn N; Lopes PS; Guimarães SE; Knol EF
    BMC Genet; 2013 Sep; 14():92. PubMed ID: 24063757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.