These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26432277)
1. How Distractor Objects Trigger Referential Overspecification: Testing the Effects of Visual Clutter and Distractor Distance. Koolen R; Krahmer E; Swerts M Cogn Sci; 2016 Sep; 40(7):1617-1647. PubMed ID: 26432277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of scene variation on the redundant use of color in definite reference. Koolen R; Goudbeek M; Krahmer E Cogn Sci; 2013 Mar; 37(2):395-411. PubMed ID: 23294102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. On Visually-Grounded Reference Production: Testing the Effects of Perceptual Grouping and 2D/3D Presentation Mode. Koolen R Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2247. PubMed ID: 31632326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency. Kumada T Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1402-13. PubMed ID: 20025896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Top-down attention based on object representation and incremental memory for knowledge building and inference. Kim B; Ban SW; Lee M Neural Netw; 2013 Oct; 46():9-22. PubMed ID: 23624577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adaptability and specificity of inhibition processes in distractor-induced blindness. Winther GN; Niedeggen M Psychophysiology; 2017 Dec; 54(12):1882-1898. PubMed ID: 28892157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Learned and cued distractor rejection for multiple features in visual search. Stilwell BT; Vecera SP Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Feb; 81(2):359-376. PubMed ID: 30421366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of semantic consistency and perceptual features on visual attention during scene viewing in toddlers. Helo A; van Ommen S; Pannasch S; Danteny-Dordoigne L; Rämä P Infant Behav Dev; 2017 Nov; 49():248-266. PubMed ID: 29028583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Anchoring visual search in scenes: Assessing the role of anchor objects on eye movements during visual search. Boettcher SEP; Draschkow D; Dienhart E; Võ ML J Vis; 2018 Dec; 18(13):11. PubMed ID: 30561493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reference Production as Search: The Impact of Domain Size on the Production of Distinguishing Descriptions. Gatt A; Krahmer E; van Deemter K; van Gompel RPG Cogn Sci; 2017 May; 41 Suppl 6():1457-1492. PubMed ID: 27264504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Learned distractor rejection in the face of strong target guidance. Stilwell BT; Vecera SP J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Sep; 46(9):926-941. PubMed ID: 32391708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Regional effects of clutter on human target detection performance. Asher MF; Tolhurst DJ; Troscianko T; Gilchrist ID J Vis; 2013 Apr; 13(5):. PubMed ID: 23620535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hysteresis in the dynamic perception of scenes and objects. Poltoratski S; Tong F J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Oct; 143(5):1875-92. PubMed ID: 25150947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Negative cues lead to more inefficient search than positive cues even at later stages of visual search. Kawashima T; Matsumoto E Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Oct; 190():85-94. PubMed ID: 30036747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Spatial attention, preview, and popout: which factors influence critical spacing in crowded displays? Scolari M; Kohnen A; Barton B; Awh E J Vis; 2007 Feb; 7(2):7.1-23. PubMed ID: 18217822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Learned suppression for multiple distractors in visual search. Won BY; Geng JJ J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1128-1141. PubMed ID: 29733673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Attentional selection by distractor suppression. Caputo G; Guerra S Vision Res; 1998 Mar; 38(5):669-89. PubMed ID: 9604099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Electrophysiological indices of target and distractor processing in visual search. Hickey C; Di Lollo V; McDonald JJ J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):760-75. PubMed ID: 18564048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rewarded visual items capture attention only in heterogeneous contexts. Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Brandhofer R; Schubö A Psychophysiology; 2016 Jul; 53(7):1063-73. PubMed ID: 26997364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Can templates-for-rejection suppress real-world affective objects in visual search? Brown CRH; Derakshan N Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Aug; 31(4):1843-1855. PubMed ID: 38316718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]