BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

424 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26432319)

  • 1. Mandibular changes secondary to serial extractions compared with late premolar extractions and controls.
    Feldman E; Kennedy DB; Aleksejuniene J; Hannam AG; Yen EH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Oct; 148(4):633-40. PubMed ID: 26432319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mandibular dental changes following serial and late extraction of mandibular second premolars.
    Mintenko R; Kennedy DB; Aleksejuniene J; Hannam AG; Yen EH
    Angle Orthod; 2020 Mar; 90(2):187-193. PubMed ID: 31647311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tooth movement after orthodontic treatment with 4 second premolar extractions.
    Chen K; Han X; Huang L; Bai D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Dec; 138(6):770-7. PubMed ID: 21130336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three-dimensional analysis of the tooth movement and arch dimension changes in Class I malocclusions treated with first premolar extractions: a guideline for virtual treatment planning.
    Cho MY; Choi JH; Lee SP; Baek SH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Dec; 138(6):747-57. PubMed ID: 21130334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An occlusal and cephalometric analysis of maxillary first and second premolar extraction effects.
    Ong HB; Woods MG
    Angle Orthod; 2001 Apr; 71(2):90-102. PubMed ID: 11302594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of orthodontic treatment and premolar extractions on the mandibular third molars.
    Celikoglu M; Kamak H; Akkast I; Oktay H
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 Nov; 26(2):160-4. PubMed ID: 21175026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the dental arch changes in patients with different malocclusions.
    Singh DP; Garg AK; Singh SP; Krishna Nayak US; Gupta M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2014; 25(5):623-9. PubMed ID: 25511063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of premolar extractions on Bolton overall ratios and tooth-size discrepancies in a Japanese orthodontic population.
    Endo T; Ishida K; Shundo I; Sakaeda K; Shimooka S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):508-14. PubMed ID: 20362911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cephalometric configuration of the occlusal plane in patients with anterior open bite.
    Choi YJ; Kim DJ; Nam J; Chung CJ; Kim KH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Mar; 149(3):391-400. PubMed ID: 26926027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stability of class II subdivision malocclusion treatment with 3 and 4 premolar extractions.
    Janson G; Araki J; Estelita S; Camardella LT
    Prog Orthod; 2014 Dec; 15(1):67. PubMed ID: 25547371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparative study of dental arch widths: extraction and non-extraction treatment.
    Işik F; Sayinsu K; Nalbantgil D; Arun T
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Dec; 27(6):585-9. PubMed ID: 16257988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of the cephalometric characteristics on the occlusal success rate of Class II malocclusions treated with nonextraction or with two maxillary premolar extraction protocols.
    Janson G; Simão TM; Barros SE; Janson M; de Freitas MR
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):e63-71. PubMed ID: 21490991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An occlusal and cephalometric analysis of lower first and second premolar extraction effects.
    Shearn BN; Woods MG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Mar; 117(3):351-61. PubMed ID: 10715095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of levelling of the curve of Spee on the proclination of mandibular incisors and expansion of dental arches: a prospective clinical trial.
    Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Sifakakis I; Makou M; Eliades T
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 May; 26(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 20575202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An assessment of late fixed functional treatment and the stability of Forsus appliance effects.
    Gao W; Li X; Bai Y
    Aust Orthod J; 2014 May; 30(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 24968640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of mandibular arch changes during alignment and leveling with 2 preadjusted edgewise appliances.
    Fleming PS; DiBiase AT; Sarri G; Lee RT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):340-7. PubMed ID: 19732667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of first and second premolar extractions on third molars: A retrospective longitudinal study.
    Miclotte A; Grommen B; Cadenas de Llano-Pérula M; Verdonck A; Jacobs R; Willems G
    J Dent; 2017 Jun; 61():55-66. PubMed ID: 28359700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy of intraarch mechanics using differential moments for achieving anchorage control in extraction cases.
    Rajcich MM; Sadowsky C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Oct; 112(4):441-8. PubMed ID: 9345157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of rate of canine retraction into recent extraction site with and without gingival fiberotomy: a clinical study.
    Kalra A; Jaggi N; Bansal M; Goel S; Medsinge SV; Abraham R; Jasoria G
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 May; 14(3):419-26. PubMed ID: 24171983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stability of extraction space closure.
    Garib DG; Bressane LB; Janson G; Gribel BF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Jan; 149(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 26718374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.