These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26432378)

  • 1. Transition from reactive control to proactive control across conflict adaptation: An sLORETA study.
    Suzuki K; Shinoda H
    Brain Cogn; 2015 Nov; 100():7-14. PubMed ID: 26432378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. It's the Other Way Around! Early Modulation of Sensory Distractor Processing Induced by Late Response Conflict.
    Pastötter B; Frings C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Jul; 30(7):985-998. PubMed ID: 29668394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Context modulates early stimulus processing when resolving stimulus-response conflict.
    Scerif G; Worden MS; Davidson M; Seiger L; Casey BJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 May; 18(5):781-92. PubMed ID: 16768377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A neural mechanism of cognitive control for resolving conflict between abstract task rules.
    Sheu YS; Courtney SM
    Cortex; 2016 Dec; 85():13-24. PubMed ID: 27771559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Proactive and reactive control in S-R compatibility: a brain potential analysis.
    Mansfield KL; van der Molen MW; van Boxtel GJ
    Psychophysiology; 2012 Jun; 49(6):756-69. PubMed ID: 22524194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The temporal dynamics of medial and lateral frontal neural activity related to proactive cognitive control.
    West R; Bailey K; Tiernan BN; Boonsuk W; Gilbert S
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Dec; 50(14):3450-60. PubMed ID: 23085124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cognitive control activity is modulated by the magnitude of interference and pre-activation of monitoring mechanisms.
    Cespón J; Galdo-Álvarez S; Díaz F
    Sci Rep; 2016 Dec; 6():39595. PubMed ID: 27995983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electrophysiological dynamics reveal distinct processing of stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response conflicts.
    Li Q; Wang K; Nan W; Zheng Y; Wu H; Wang H; Liu X
    Psychophysiology; 2015 Apr; 52(4):562-71. PubMed ID: 25395309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Defensive motivation increases conflict adaptation through local changes in cognitive control: Evidence from ERPs and mid-frontal theta.
    Yang Q; Paul K; Pourtois G
    Biol Psychol; 2019 Nov; 148():107738. PubMed ID: 31374241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ad-hoc and context-dependent adjustments of selective attention in conflict control: an ERP study with visual probes.
    Nigbur R; Schneider J; Sommer W; Dimigen O; Stürmer B
    Neuroimage; 2015 Feb; 107():76-84. PubMed ID: 25482266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Parametric manipulation of conflict and response competition using rapid mixed-trial event-related fMRI.
    Durston S; Davidson MC; Thomas KM; Worden MS; Tottenham N; Martinez A; Watts R; Ulug AM; Casey BJ
    Neuroimage; 2003 Dec; 20(4):2135-41. PubMed ID: 14683717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neural time course of conflict adaptation effects on the Stroop task.
    Larson MJ; Kaufman DA; Perlstein WM
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Feb; 47(3):663-70. PubMed ID: 19071142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Expectancy effects during response selection modulate attentional selection and inhibitory control networks.
    Chmielewski WX; Mückschel M; Roessner V; Beste C
    Behav Brain Res; 2014 Nov; 274():53-61. PubMed ID: 25116248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differential modulation of the N2 and P3 event-related potentials by response conflict and inhibition.
    Groom MJ; Cragg L
    Brain Cogn; 2015 Jul; 97():1-9. PubMed ID: 25955278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electrophysiological evidence for the involvement of proactive and reactive control in a rewarded stop-signal task.
    Schevernels H; Bombeke K; Van der Borght L; Hopf JM; Krebs RM; Boehler CN
    Neuroimage; 2015 Nov; 121():115-25. PubMed ID: 26188262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Anticipating conflict facilitates controlled stimulus-response selection.
    Correa A; Rao A; Nobre AC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1461-72. PubMed ID: 18823248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Influence of Hearing Loss on Cognitive Control in an Auditory Conflict Task: Behavioral and Pupillometry Findings.
    Zekveld AA; van Scheepen JAM; Versfeld NJ; Kramer SE; van Steenbergen H
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Jul; 63(7):2483-2492. PubMed ID: 32610026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Temporal Dynamics of Response Inhibition and their Modulation by Cognitive Control.
    Raud L; Huster RJ
    Brain Topogr; 2017 Jul; 30(4):486-501. PubMed ID: 28456867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. N1 and N2 ERPs reflect the regulation of automatic approach tendencies to positive stimuli.
    Ernst LH; Ehlis AC; Dresler T; Tupak SV; Weidner A; Fallgatter AJ
    Neurosci Res; 2013 Mar; 75(3):239-49. PubMed ID: 23298530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accessory stimuli affect the emergence of conflict, not conflict control.
    Böckler A; Alpay G; Stürmer B
    Exp Psychol; 2011; 58(2):102-9. PubMed ID: 20494861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.