These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26432807)

  • 1. The importance of being NICE.
    Rid A; Littlejohns P; Wilson J; Rumbold B; Kieslich K; Weale A
    J R Soc Med; 2015 Oct; 108(10):385-9. PubMed ID: 26432807
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Health technology assessment - an important opportunity to inform the use of medical devices in the paediatric population: an analysis of NICE Medical Technology Guidance.
    Greasley S; Campbell M; Wall J
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2023 Jul; 21(4):533-535. PubMed ID: 37149507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Redaction at the heart of NICE appraisals.
    Cave JA
    Drug Ther Bull; 2023 Sep; 61(9):130. PubMed ID: 37524407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. NICE: mostly a bad idea.
    Leaman A
    Emerg Med J; 2009 Sep; 26(9):627-8. PubMed ID: 19700572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Data briefing. NICE (National Institute for Clinical Excellence).
    Appleby J
    Health Serv J; 2000 Jun; 110(5708):32. PubMed ID: 11183800
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Searching for a threshold - Not so NICE..
    Mooney G; Coast J; Jan S; ; Ryan M; Wiseman V
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2007 Jul; 12(3):190; author reply 190-1. PubMed ID: 17716427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. NICE appraisals should be everybody's business.
    Wells J; Cheong-Leen C
    BMJ; 2007 May; 334(7600):936-8. PubMed ID: 17478847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. NICE and new: appraising innovation.
    Ferner RE; Hughes DA; Aronson JK
    BMJ; 2010 Jan; 340():b5493. PubMed ID: 20051468
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adopting medical technologies and diagnostics recommended by NICE: the Health Technologies Adoption Programme.
    Chisholm S
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2014 Jul; 96(5):400-1. PubMed ID: 24992441
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. NICE work--providing guidance to the British National Health Service.
    Rawlins MD
    N Engl J Med; 2004 Sep; 351(14):1383-5. PubMed ID: 15459297
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Valuing health technologies at NICE: recommendations for improved incorporation of treatment value in HTA.
    Goldman D; Lakdawalla D; Philipson TJ; Yin W
    Health Econ; 2010 Oct; 19(10):1109-16. PubMed ID: 20842680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On being NICE in the UK: guidelines for technology appraisal for the NHS in England and Wales.
    Birch S; Gafni A
    Health Econ; 2002 Apr; 11(3):185-91. PubMed ID: 11921316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Saying no isn't NICE - the travails of Britain's National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.
    Steinbrook R
    N Engl J Med; 2008 Nov; 359(19):1977-81. PubMed ID: 18987366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality, innovation, and value for money: NICE and the British National Health Service.
    Pearson SD; Rawlins MD
    JAMA; 2005 Nov; 294(20):2618-22. PubMed ID: 16304076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Let cost effectiveness models be open to scrutiny.
    Poole C; Agrawal S; Currie CJ
    BMJ; 2007 Oct; 335(7623):735. PubMed ID: 17932167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The failings of NICE. NICE and evidence based medicine are not really compatible.
    Lipman T
    BMJ; 2001 Feb; 322(7284):489-90. PubMed ID: 11222439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The failings of NICE. Reply from chairman of NICE.
    Rawlins MD
    BMJ; 2001 Feb; 322(7284):489. PubMed ID: 11222437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The potential of telemedicine.
    Goodall I
    Prof Nurse; 1999 Sep; 14(12):817. PubMed ID: 10603888
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nasty or nice? A perspective on the use of health technology assessment in the United Kingdom.
    Drummond M; Sorenson C
    Value Health; 2009 Jun; 12 Suppl 2():S8-13. PubMed ID: 19523188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Seeing the NICE side of cost-effectiveness analysis: a qualitative investigation of the use of CEA in NICE technology appraisals.
    Bryan S; Williams I; McIver S
    Health Econ; 2007 Feb; 16(2):179-93. PubMed ID: 16960851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.