These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26433277)

  • 1. Clinical Outcome and Cost Analysis of Sutureless Versus Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation With Propensity Score Matching Analysis.
    Santarpino G; Pfeiffer S; Jessl J; Dell'Aquila A; Vogt F; von Wardenburg C; Schwab J; Sirch J; Pauschinger M; Fischlein T
    Am J Cardiol; 2015 Dec; 116(11):1737-43. PubMed ID: 26433277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sutureless replacement versus transcatheter valve implantation in aortic valve stenosis: a propensity-matched analysis of 2 strategies in high-risk patients.
    Santarpino G; Pfeiffer S; Jessl J; Dell'Aquila AM; Pollari F; Pauschinger M; Fischlein T
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Feb; 147(2):561-7. PubMed ID: 24280712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sutureless versus Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implant: A Propensity Score Matching Study.
    Santarpino G; Vogt F; Pfeiffer S; Dell'Aquila AM; Jessl J; Cuomo F; von Wardenburg C; Fischlein T; Pauschinger M; Schwab J
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2017 May; 26(3):255-261. PubMed ID: 29092108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of conventional surgery, transcatheter aortic valve replacement, and sutureless valves in "real-world" patients with aortic stenosis and intermediate- to high-risk profile.
    Muneretto C; Alfieri O; Cesana BM; Bisleri G; De Bonis M; Di Bartolomeo R; Savini C; Folesani G; Di Bacco L; Rambaldini M; Maureira JP; Laborde F; Tespili M; Repossini A; Folliguet T
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Dec; 150(6):1570-7; discussion 1577-9. PubMed ID: 26384753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sutureless aortic valve replacement versus transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a meta-analysis of comparative matched studies using propensity score matching.
    Meco M; Miceli A; Montisci A; Donatelli F; Cirri S; Ferrarini M; Lio A; Glauber M
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2018 Feb; 26(2):202-209. PubMed ID: 29049787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Costs and in-hospital outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement in commercial cases using a propensity score matched model.
    Minutello RM; Wong SC; Swaminathan RV; Feldman DN; Kaple RK; Horn EM; Devereux RB; Salemi A; Sun X; Singh H; Bergman G; Kim LK
    Am J Cardiol; 2015 May; 115(10):1443-7. PubMed ID: 25784513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Immediate outcome after sutureless versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
    Biancari F; Barbanti M; Santarpino G; Deste W; Tamburino C; Gulino S; Immè S; Di Simone E; Todaro D; Pollari F; Fischlein T; Kasama K; Meuris B; Dalén M; Sartipy U; Svenarud P; Lahtinen J; Heikkinen J; Juvonen T; Gatti G; Pappalardo A; Mignosa C; Rubino AS
    Heart Vessels; 2016 Mar; 31(3):427-33. PubMed ID: 25573258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Surgical sutureless and transcatheter aortic valves: hemodynamic performance and clinical outcomes in propensity score-matched high-risk populations with severe aortic stenosis.
    Kamperidis V; van Rosendael PJ; de Weger A; Katsanos S; Regeer M; van der Kley F; Mertens B; Sianos G; Ajmone Marsan N; Bax JJ; Delgado V
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Apr; 8(5):670-7. PubMed ID: 25946438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Better short-term outcome by using sutureless valves: a propensity-matched score analysis.
    Pollari F; Santarpino G; Dell'Aquila AM; Gazdag L; Alnahas H; Vogt F; Pfeiffer S; Fischlein T
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2014 Aug; 98(2):611-6; discussion 616-7. PubMed ID: 24928678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction on hospital outcome after transcatheter aortic valve implantation or surgical aortic valve replacement: results from a propensity-matched population of the Italian OBSERVANT multicenter study.
    Onorati F; D'Errigo P; Grossi C; Barbanti M; Ranucci M; Covello DR; Rosato S; Maraschini A; Santoro G; Tamburino C; Seccareccia F; Santini F; Menicanti L;
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Feb; 147(2):568-75. PubMed ID: 24263007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement with a sutureless valve through a right anterior mini-thoracotomy versus transcatheter aortic valve implantation in high-risk patients.
    Miceli A; Gilmanov D; Murzi M; Marchi F; Ferrarini M; Cerillo AG; Quaini E; Solinas M; Berti S; Glauber M
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Mar; 49(3):960-5. PubMed ID: 26113005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement performed in the catheterization laboratory (minimalist approach) versus hybrid operating room (standard approach): outcomes and cost analysis.
    Babaliaros V; Devireddy C; Lerakis S; Leonardi R; Iturra SA; Mavromatis K; Leshnower BG; Guyton RA; Kanitkar M; Keegan P; Simone A; Stewart JP; Ghasemzadeh N; Block P; Thourani VH
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Aug; 7(8):898-904. PubMed ID: 25086843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical aortic valve replacement in 1,141 patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis and less than high risk.
    Schymik G; Heimeshoff M; Bramlage P; Herbinger T; Würth A; Pilz L; Schymik JS; Wondraschek R; Süselbeck T; Gerhardus J; Luik A; Gonska BD; Tzamalis P; Posival H; Schmitt C; Schröfel H
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Oct; 86(4):738-44. PubMed ID: 25641398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hospital cost savings and other advantages of sutureless vs stented aortic valves for intermediate-risk elderly patients.
    Minami T; Sainte S; De Praetere H; Rega F; Flameng W; Verbrugghe P; Meuris B
    Surg Today; 2017 Oct; 47(10):1268-1273. PubMed ID: 28386747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Aortic valve replacement through full sternotomy with a stented bioprosthesis versus minimally invasive sternotomy with a sutureless bioprosthesis.
    Dalén M; Biancari F; Rubino AS; Santarpino G; Glaser N; De Praetere H; Kasama K; Juvonen T; Deste W; Pollari F; Meuris B; Fischlein T; Mignosa C; Gatti G; Pappalardo A; Svenarud P; Sartipy U
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jan; 49(1):220-7. PubMed ID: 25653252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Treating the patients in the 'grey-zone' with aortic valve disease: a comparison among conventional surgery, sutureless valves and transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
    Muneretto C; Bisleri G; Moggi A; Di Bacco L; Tespili M; Repossini A; Rambaldini M
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2015 Jan; 20(1):90-5. PubMed ID: 25320140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Full sternotomy versus right anterior minithoracotomy for isolated aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: a propensity-matched study †.
    Gilmanov D; Farneti PA; Ferrarini M; Santarelli F; Murzi M; Miceli A; Solinas M; Glauber M
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2015 Jun; 20(6):732-41; discussion 741. PubMed ID: 25757476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement: a propensity score analysis in patients at high surgical risk.
    Conradi L; Seiffert M; Treede H; Silaschi M; Baldus S; Schirmer J; Kersten JF; Meinertz T; Reichenspurner H
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Jan; 143(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 22054662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Thirty-day outcome after transcatheter aortic valve implantation compared with surgical valve replacement in patients with high-risk aortic stenosis: a matched comparison.
    Stöhr R; Dohmen G; Herpertz R; Brehmer K; Aktug O; Koos R; Altiok E; Stegemann E; Autschbach R; Marx N; Hoffmann R
    Coron Artery Dis; 2011 Dec; 22(8):595-600. PubMed ID: 22009042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The rise of new technologies for aortic valve stenosis: A comparison of sutureless and transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
    D'Onofrio A; Salizzoni S; Rubino AS; Besola L; Filippini C; Alfieri O; Colombo A; Agrifoglio M; Fischlein T; Rapetto F; Tarantini G; Dalèn M; Gabbieri D; Meuris B; Savini C; Gatti G; Aiello ML; Biancari F; Livi U; Stefàno PL; Cassese M; Borrello B; Rinaldi M; Mignosa C; Gerosa G;
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Jul; 152(1):99-109.e2. PubMed ID: 26898975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.