These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26433398)

  • 1. FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Introduction.
    Ayres-de-Campos D; Arulkumaran S;
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 Oct; 131(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 26433398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Cardiotocography.
    Ayres-de-Campos D; Spong CY; Chandraharan E;
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 Oct; 131(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 26433401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Adjunctive technologies.
    Visser GH; Ayres-de-Campos D;
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 Oct; 131(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 26433402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Physiology of fetal oxygenation and the main goals of intrapartum fetal monitoring.
    Ayres-de-Campos D; Arulkumaran S;
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 Oct; 131(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 26433399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Twenty-five years after the FIGO guidelines for the use of fetal monitoring: time for a simplified approach?
    Ayres-de-Campos D; Bernardes J;
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2010 Jul; 110(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 20434156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Intermittent auscultation.
    Lewis D; Downe S;
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 Oct; 131(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 26433400
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. SisPorto 4.0 - computer analysis following the 2015 FIGO Guidelines for intrapartum fetal monitoring.
    Ayres-de-Campos D; Rei M; Nunes I; Sousa P; Bernardes J
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Jan; 30(1):62-67. PubMed ID: 26940372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. International consensus on intrapartum cardiotocography should be underpinned by sound scientific foundation.
    Sholapurkar SL
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Oct; 30(19):2340-2341. PubMed ID: 27756167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computerising the intrapartum continuous cardiotocography does not add to its predictive value: AGAINST: Computerising the intrapartum CTG does add to its predictive value.
    Chauhan SP
    BJOG; 2019 Oct; 126(11):1364. PubMed ID: 31486224
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intrapartum Fetal Monitoring.
    Am Fam Physician; 2020 Aug; 102(3):Online. PubMed ID: 32735445
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Antenatal cardiotocography (CTG).
    Devane D
    Pract Midwife; 2010 Oct; 13(9):35-6. PubMed ID: 21138138
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cardiotocography v Doppler auscultation. Guidelines highlight gaps in research evidence.
    Thomas J; Paranjothy S; Kelly T; Kavanagh J
    BMJ; 2002 Feb; 324(7335):482-5. PubMed ID: 11859056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of availability of fetal ECG monitoring on operative deliveries.
    Kale A; Chong YS; Biswas A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(11):1189-93. PubMed ID: 19016356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A randomised clinical trial on cardiotocography plus fetal blood sampling versus cardiotocography plus ST-analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram (STAN) for intrapartum monitoring.
    Westerhuis ME; Moons KG; van Beek E; Bijvoet SM; Drogtrop AP; van Geijn HP; van Lith JM; Mol BW; Nijhuis JG; Oei SG; Porath MM; Rijnders RJ; Schuitemaker NW; van der Tweel I; Visser GH; Willekes C; Kwee A
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2007 Jul; 7():13. PubMed ID: 17655764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [A new monitoring method for safer child delivery. Lower number of metabolic acidosis cases with fetal ECG and cardiotocography].
    Hagberg H; Amer-Wåhlin I; Herbst A; Lilja H; Norén H; Olofsson P; Marsál K
    Lakartidningen; 2004 Nov; 101(48):3875-6, 3878, 3880-1. PubMed ID: 15631221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An overview of central fetal monitoring systems in labour.
    Nunes I; Ayres-de-Campos D; Figueiredo C; Bernardes J
    J Perinat Med; 2013 Jan; 41(1):93-9. PubMed ID: 23093259
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Combined monitoring of labor: maternal and neonatal results].
    Goeschen K
    Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol; 1992; 196(3):103-5. PubMed ID: 1496843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cardiotocography v Doppler auscultation. Evidence is not as good as NICE suggests.
    Stuart IP
    BMJ; 2002 Feb; 324(7335):484-5. PubMed ID: 11863004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intrapartum monitoring with cardiotocography and ST-waveform analysis in breech presentation: an observational study.
    Kessler J; Moster D; Albrechtsen S
    BJOG; 2015 Mar; 122(4):528-35. PubMed ID: 25040705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ACOG Practice Bulletin. No. 62: Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring.
    ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 105(5 Pt 1):1161-9. PubMed ID: 15863569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.