These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26433402)

  • 1. FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Adjunctive technologies.
    Visser GH; Ayres-de-Campos D;
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 Oct; 131(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 26433402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Indirect standard cardiotocography plus fetal blood sampling versus indirect quantitative cardiotocography--a randomized comparative study in intrapartum monitoring].
    Ignatov P; Atanasov B
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2012; 51(5):3-10. PubMed ID: 23234029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Cardiotocography.
    Ayres-de-Campos D; Spong CY; Chandraharan E;
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 Oct; 131(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 26433401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is intrapartum fetal blood sampling still useful in modern obstetrics?
    Gyselaers W; De Bruyn C; Kerkhofs C
    BJOG; 2014 Dec; 121(13):1751-2. PubMed ID: 25413767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intrapartum fetal surveillance.
    Ayres-de-Campos D
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 Jan; 30():1-2. PubMed ID: 26302973
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Author's reply: Is intrapartum fetal blood sampling still useful in modern obstetrics?
    Chandraharan E
    BJOG; 2014 Dec; 121(13):1752-3. PubMed ID: 25413769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Introduction.
    Ayres-de-Campos D; Arulkumaran S;
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 Oct; 131(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 26433398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is STAN monitoring associated with a significant decrease in metabolic acidosis at birth compared with cardiotocography alone? Review of the three meta-analyses that included the recent US trial.
    Vayssière C; Ehlinger V; Paret L; Arnaud C
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Oct; 95(10):1190-1. PubMed ID: 27199086
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A randomised clinical trial on cardiotocography plus fetal blood sampling versus cardiotocography plus ST-analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram (STAN) for intrapartum monitoring.
    Westerhuis ME; Moons KG; van Beek E; Bijvoet SM; Drogtrop AP; van Geijn HP; van Lith JM; Mol BW; Nijhuis JG; Oei SG; Porath MM; Rijnders RJ; Schuitemaker NW; van der Tweel I; Visser GH; Willekes C; Kwee A
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2007 Jul; 7():13. PubMed ID: 17655764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fetal scalp blood sampling during labour: is it a useful diagnostic test or a historical test that no longer has a place in modern clinical obstetrics?
    Chandraharan E
    BJOG; 2014 Aug; 121(9):1056-60; discussion 1060-2. PubMed ID: 24597746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Physiology of fetal oxygenation and the main goals of intrapartum fetal monitoring.
    Ayres-de-Campos D; Arulkumaran S;
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 Oct; 131(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 26433399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Combined cardiotocographic and ST event analysis: A review.
    Amer-Wahlin I; Kwee A
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 Jan; 30():48-61. PubMed ID: 26206514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Intrapartum fetal heart rate changes during baseline T/QRS rise events in acidotic fetuses].
    Nemescu D; Onofriescu M
    Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2008; 112(4):972-9. PubMed ID: 20209772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impediments to a unified international approach to the interpretation and management of intrapartum cardiotocographs.
    Parer JT; Ugwumadu A
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Feb; 30(3):272-273. PubMed ID: 27046650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fetal scalp blood sampling during labour: is it a useful diagnostic test or a historical test that no longer has a place in modern clinical obstetrics?
    Nzewi C
    BJOG; 2014 Dec; 121(13):1753. PubMed ID: 25413771
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fetal monitoring technologies for the detection of intrapartum hypoxia - challenges and opportunities.
    Hussain NM; O'Halloran M; McDermott B; Elahi MA
    Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2024 Jan; 10(2):. PubMed ID: 38118183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Re: Fetal scalp blood sampling during labour: is it a useful diagnostic test or a historical test that no longer has a place in modern clinical obstetrics [corrected]?
    Sholapurkar SL
    BJOG; 2014 Dec; 121(13):1750. PubMed ID: 25413766
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Authors' reply: Fetal scalp blood sampling during labour: is it a useful diagnostic test or a historical test that no longer has a place in modern clinical obstetrics?
    Chandraharan E
    BJOG; 2014 Dec; 121(13):1753-4. PubMed ID: 25413770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Author's reply: Fetal scalp blood sampling during labour: is it a useful diagnostic test or a historical test which has no longer a place in modern clinical obstetrics.
    Chandraharan E
    BJOG; 2014 Dec; 121(13):1751. PubMed ID: 25413768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Methods of fetal surveillance during labor. Guidelines].
    Collége National des Gynécologues et Obstétriciens Français
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 Feb; 37 Suppl 1():S101-7. PubMed ID: 18409212
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.