303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26433415)
1. Single-step genomic model improved reliability and reduced the bias of genomic predictions in Danish Jersey.
Ma P; Lund MS; Nielsen US; Aamand GP; Su G
J Dairy Sci; 2015 Dec; 98(12):9026-34. PubMed ID: 26433415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Including different groups of genotyped females for genomic prediction in a Nordic Jersey population.
Gao H; Madsen P; Nielsen US; Aamand GP; Su G; Byskov K; Jensen J
J Dairy Sci; 2015 Dec; 98(12):9051-9. PubMed ID: 26433419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sharing reference data and including cows in the reference population improve genomic predictions in Danish Jersey.
Su G; Ma P; Nielsen US; Aamand GP; Wiggans G; Guldbrandtsen B; Lund MS
Animal; 2016 Jun; 10(6):1067-75. PubMed ID: 26330119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of a Bayesian model including QTL markers increases prediction reliability when test animals are distant from the reference population.
Ma P; Lund MS; Aamand GP; Su G
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Aug; 102(8):7237-7247. PubMed ID: 31155255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of genomic predictions using genomic relationship matrices built with different weighting factors to account for locus-specific variances.
Su G; Christensen OF; Janss L; Lund MS
J Dairy Sci; 2014 Oct; 97(10):6547-59. PubMed ID: 25129495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of genotyped cows in the reference population on the genomic evaluation of Holstein cattle.
Uemoto Y; Osawa T; Saburi J
Animal; 2017 Mar; 11(3):382-393. PubMed ID: 27515004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of genomic predictions for lowly heritable traits using multi-step and single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in Holstein cattle.
Guarini AR; Lourenco DAL; Brito LF; Sargolzaei M; Baes CF; Miglior F; Misztal I; Schenkel FS
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Sep; 101(9):8076-8086. PubMed ID: 29935829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Including overseas performance information in genomic evaluations of Australian dairy cattle.
Haile-Mariam M; Pryce JE; Schrooten C; Hayes BJ
J Dairy Sci; 2015 May; 98(5):3443-59. PubMed ID: 25771052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of genomic predictions in Gyr (Bos indicus) dairy cattle.
Boison SA; Utsunomiya ATH; Santos DJA; Neves HHR; Carvalheiro R; Mészáros G; Utsunomiya YT; do Carmo AS; Verneque RS; Machado MA; Panetto JCC; Garcia JF; Sölkner J; da Silva MVGB
J Dairy Sci; 2017 Jul; 100(7):5479-5490. PubMed ID: 28527809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Value of sharing cow reference population between countries on reliability of genomic prediction for milk yield traits.
Haile-Mariam M; MacLeod IM; Bolormaa S; Schrooten C; O'Connor E; de Jong G; Daetwyler HD; Pryce JE
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Feb; 103(2):1711-1728. PubMed ID: 31864746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Genomic prediction of lactation curves for milk, fat, protein, and somatic cell score in Holstein cattle.
Oliveira HR; Brito LF; Silva FF; Lourenco DAL; Jamrozik J; Schenkel FS
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Jan; 102(1):452-463. PubMed ID: 30391177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development of genomic predictions for Angus cattle in Brazil incorporating genotypes from related American sires.
Campos GS; Cardoso FF; Gomes CCG; Domingues R; de Almeida Regitano LC; de Sena Oliveira MC; de Oliveira HN; Carvalheiro R; Albuquerque LG; Miller S; Misztal I; Lourenco D
J Anim Sci; 2022 Feb; 100(2):. PubMed ID: 35031806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Genomic predictions for yield traits in US Holsteins with unknown parent groups.
Cesarani A; Masuda Y; Tsuruta S; Nicolazzi EL; VanRaden PM; Lourenco D; Misztal I
J Dairy Sci; 2021 May; 104(5):5843-5853. PubMed ID: 33663836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimizing genomic prediction for Australian Red dairy cattle.
van den Berg I; MacLeod IM; Reich CM; Breen EJ; Pryce JE
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jul; 103(7):6276-6298. PubMed ID: 32331891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Domestic estimated breeding values and genomic enhanced breeding values of bulls in comparison with their foreign genomic enhanced breeding values.
Přibyl J; Bauer J; Čermák V; Pešek P; Přibylová J; Šplíchal J; Vostrá-Vydrová H; Vostrý L; Zavadilová L
Animal; 2015 Oct; 9(10):1635-42. PubMed ID: 26133272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Controlling bias in genomic breeding values for young genotyped bulls.
Tsuruta S; Lourenco DAL; Masuda Y; Misztal I; Lawlor TJ
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Nov; 102(11):9956-9970. PubMed ID: 31495630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Application of single-step genomic evaluation using multiple-trait random regression test-day models in dairy cattle.
Oliveira HR; Lourenco DAL; Masuda Y; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Jamrozik J; Brito LF; Silva FF; Schenkel FS
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Mar; 102(3):2365-2377. PubMed ID: 30638992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Genomic prediction for Nordic Red Cattle using one-step and selection index blending.
Su G; Madsen P; Nielsen US; Mäntysaari EA; Aamand GP; Christensen OF; Lund MS
J Dairy Sci; 2012 Feb; 95(2):909-17. PubMed ID: 22281355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assigning unknown parent groups to reduce bias in genomic evaluations of final score in US Holsteins.
Tsuruta S; Misztal I; Lourenco DA; Lawlor TJ
J Dairy Sci; 2014 Sep; 97(9):5814-21. PubMed ID: 24997668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Genomic prediction of milk-production traits and somatic cell score using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor with random regression test-day model in Thai dairy cattle.
Buaban S; Prempree S; Sumreddee P; Duangjinda M; Masuda Y
J Dairy Sci; 2021 Dec; 104(12):12713-12723. PubMed ID: 34538484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
