These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26433778)

  • 1. Experimental and numerical characterization of the water flow in spacer-filled channels of spiral-wound membranes.
    Bucs SS; Linares RV; Marston JO; Radu AI; Vrouwenvelder JS; Picioreanu C
    Water Res; 2015 Dec; 87():299-310. PubMed ID: 26433778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Porosity of spacer-filled channels in spiral-wound membrane systems: Quantification methods and impact on hydraulic characterization.
    Siddiqui A; Lehmann S; Haaksman V; Ogier J; Schellenberg C; van Loosdrecht MCM; Kruithof JC; Vrouwenvelder JS
    Water Res; 2017 Aug; 119():304-311. PubMed ID: 28501608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development and characterization of 3D-printed feed spacers for spiral wound membrane systems.
    Siddiqui A; Farhat N; Bucs SS; Linares RV; Picioreanu C; Kruithof JC; van Loosdrecht MC; Kidwell J; Vrouwenvelder JS
    Water Res; 2016 Mar; 91():55-67. PubMed ID: 26773488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of organic nutrient load on biomass accumulation, feed channel pressure drop increase and permeate flux decline in membrane systems.
    Bucs SS; Valladares Linares R; van Loosdrecht MC; Kruithof JC; Vrouwenvelder JS
    Water Res; 2014 Dec; 67():227-42. PubMed ID: 25282091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spacer geometry and particle deposition in spiral wound membrane feed channels.
    Radu AI; van Steen MSH; Vrouwenvelder JS; van Loosdrecht MCM; Picioreanu C
    Water Res; 2014 Nov; 64():160-176. PubMed ID: 25055226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visualization of hydraulic conditions inside the feed channel of Reverse Osmosis: A practical comparison of velocity between empty and spacer-filled channel.
    Haidari AH; Heijman SGJ; van der Meer WGJ
    Water Res; 2016 Dec; 106():232-241. PubMed ID: 27723481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fouling resilient perforated feed spacers for membrane filtration.
    Kerdi S; Qamar A; Vrouwenvelder JS; Ghaffour N
    Water Res; 2018 Sep; 140():211-219. PubMed ID: 29715645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of biofilm accumulation on transmembrane and feed channel pressure drop: effects of crossflow velocity, feed spacer and biodegradable nutrient.
    Dreszer C; Flemming HC; Zwijnenburg A; Kruithof JC; Vrouwenvelder JS
    Water Res; 2014 Mar; 50():200-11. PubMed ID: 24374131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impacts of non-uniform filament feed spacers characteristics on the hydraulic and anti-fouling performances in the spacer-filled membrane channels: Experiment and numerical simulation.
    Lin WC; Shao RP; Wang XM; Huang X
    Water Res; 2020 Oct; 185():116251. PubMed ID: 32771564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Roles and performance enhancement of feed spacer in spiral wound membrane modules for water treatment: A 20-year review on research evolvement.
    Lin W; Zhang Y; Li D; Wang XM; Huang X
    Water Res; 2021 Jun; 198():117146. PubMed ID: 33945947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A novel scenario for biofouling control of spiral wound membrane systems.
    Vrouwenvelder JS; Van Loosdrecht MC; Kruithof JC
    Water Res; 2011 Jul; 45(13):3890-8. PubMed ID: 21592541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Numerical simulation of bubble induced shear in membrane bioreactors: effects of mixed liquor rheology and membrane configuration.
    Liu X; Wang Y; Waite TD; Leslie G
    Water Res; 2015 May; 75():131-45. PubMed ID: 25768986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biofouling of spiral-wound nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes: a feed spacer problem.
    Vrouwenvelder JS; Graf von der Schulenburg DA; Kruithof JC; Johns ML; van Loosdrecht MC
    Water Res; 2009 Feb; 43(3):583-94. PubMed ID: 19058830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multilaboratory particle image velocimetry analysis of the FDA benchmark nozzle model to support validation of computational fluid dynamics simulations.
    Hariharan P; Giarra M; Reddy V; Day SW; Manning KB; Deutsch S; Stewart SF; Myers MR; Berman MR; Burgreen GW; Paterson EG; Malinauskas RA
    J Biomech Eng; 2011 Apr; 133(4):041002. PubMed ID: 21428676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hydrogel-coated feed spacers in two-phase flow cleaning in spiral wound membrane elements: a novel platform for eco-friendly biofouling mitigation.
    Wibisono Y; Yandi W; Golabi M; Nugraha R; Cornelissen ER; Kemperman AJ; Ederth T; Nijmeijer K
    Water Res; 2015 Mar; 71():171-86. PubMed ID: 25616114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of Concentration Polarisation in Full-Size Spiral Wound Reverse Osmosis Membranes Using Computational Fluid Dynamics.
    Wei W; Zou X; Ji X; Zhou R; Zhao K; Wang Y
    Membranes (Basel); 2021 May; 11(5):. PubMed ID: 34068812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pressure drop increase by biofilm accumulation in spiral wound RO and NF membrane systems: role of substrate concentration, flow velocity, substrate load and flow direction.
    Vrouwenvelder JS; Hinrichs C; Van der Meer WG; Van Loosdrecht MC; Kruithof JC
    Biofouling; 2009; 25(6):543-55. PubMed ID: 19437193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can a stepwise steady flow computational fluid dynamics model reproduce unsteady particulate matter separation for common unit operations?
    Pathapati SS; Sansalone JJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jul; 45(13):5605-13. PubMed ID: 21644537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predicting membrane flux decline from complex mixtures using flow-field flow fractionation measurements and semi-empirical theory.
    Pellegrino J; Wright S; Ranvill J; Amy G
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):85-92. PubMed ID: 16003965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computational fluid dynamics with stents: quantitative comparison with particle image velocimetry for three commercial off the shelf intracranial stents.
    Bouillot P; Brina O; Ouared R; Yilmaz H; Lovblad KO; Farhat M; Mendes Pereira V
    J Neurointerv Surg; 2016 Mar; 8(3):309-15. PubMed ID: 25603807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.