BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

405 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26434669)

  • 41. Postsurgical urodynamic study of total laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for uterine cervical cancer.
    Terada S; Terai Y; Tanaka Y; Tanaka T; Tsunetoh S; Ohmichi M
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2022 Nov; 48(11):2863-2871. PubMed ID: 35934761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Surgical and Oncological Outcome of Robotic Surgery Compared With Laparoscopic and Abdominal Surgery in the Management of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.
    Corrado G; Cutillo G; Saltari M; Mancini E; Sindico S; Vici P; Sergi D; Sperduti I; Patrizi L; Pomati G; Baiocco E; Vizza E
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Mar; 26(3):539-46. PubMed ID: 26825826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Surgicopathologic outcome of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy.
    Ghezzi F; Cromi A; Ciravolo G; Volpi E; Uccella S; Rampinelli F; Bergamini V
    Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Sep; 106(3):502-6. PubMed ID: 17553554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Zhang F; Song X
    Am J Clin Oncol; 2022 Nov; 45(11):465-474. PubMed ID: 36256872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Robotic radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Shazly SA; Murad MH; Dowdy SC; Gostout BS; Famuyide AO
    Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Aug; 138(2):457-71. PubMed ID: 26056752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparison between laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 and tumor size <2 cm cervical cancer with visible or invisible tumors: a multicentre retrospective study.
    Li P; Chen L; Ni Y; Liu J; Li D; Guo J; Liu Z; Jin S; Xu Y; Li Z; Wang L; Bin X; Lang J; Liu P; Chen C
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Mar; 32(2):e17. PubMed ID: 33470062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A single-center study.
    Oyama K; Kanno K; Kojima R; Shirane A; Yanai S; Ota Y; Andou M
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Feb; 45(2):405-411. PubMed ID: 30426602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Patterns of recurrence and survival after abdominal versus laparoscopic/robotic radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer.
    Kong TW; Chang SJ; Piao X; Paek J; Lee Y; Lee EJ; Chun M; Ryu HS
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Jan; 42(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 26554751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Neoadjuvant Platinum-based Chemotherapy Followed by Radical Hysterectomy for Stage Ib2-IIb Adenocarcinoma of the Uterine Cervix - An Italian Multicenter Retrospective Study.
    Gadducci A; Landoni F; Cosio S; Zizioli V; Zola P; Ferrero AM; Lapresa MT; Maggino T; Sartori E
    Anticancer Res; 2018 Jun; 38(6):3627-3634. PubMed ID: 29848719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Robotic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Population-Based Study of Adoption and Immediate Postoperative Outcomes in the United States.
    Piedimonte S; Czuzoj-Shulman N; Gotlieb W; Abenhaim HA
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(3):551-557. PubMed ID: 30195078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Clinical and Oncologic Outcomes of Robotic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Women With Cervical Cancer: Experience at a Referral Cancer Center.
    Zanagnolo V; Minig L; Rollo D; Tomaselli T; Aletti G; Bocciolone L; Landoni F; Cardenas Rebollo JM; Maggioni A
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Mar; 26(3):568-74. PubMed ID: 26825827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Clinicopathological variables predictive of clinical outcome in patients with FIGO stage Ib2-IIb cervical cancer treated with cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical hysterectomy.
    Gadducci A; Teti G; Barsotti C; Tana R; Fanucchi A; Orlandini C; Fabrini MG; Genazzani AR
    Anticancer Res; 2010 Jan; 30(1):201-8. PubMed ID: 20150636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Pathological response on surgical samples is an independent prognostic variable for patients with Stage Ib2-IIb cervical cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical hysterectomy: an Italian multicenter retrospective study (CTF Study).
    Gadducci A; Sartori E; Maggino T; Zola P; Cosio S; Zizioli V; Lapresa M; Piovano E; Landoni F
    Gynecol Oncol; 2013 Dec; 131(3):640-4. PubMed ID: 24096111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Laparoscopic versus open abdominal management of cervical cancer: long-term results from a propensity-matched analysis.
    Bogani G; Cromi A; Uccella S; Serati M; Casarin J; Pinelli C; Ghezzi F
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(5):857-62. PubMed ID: 24699300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in locally advanced stage IB2-IIB cervical cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
    Vizza E; Pellegrino A; Milani R; Fruscio R; Baiocco E; Cognetti F; Savarese A; Tomao F; Chen C; Corrado G
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2011 Apr; 37(4):364-9. PubMed ID: 21194881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Survival outcomes of abdominal radical hysterectomy, laparoscopic radical hysterectomy, robot-assisted radical hysterectomy and vaginal radical hysterectomy approaches for early-stage cervical cancer: a retrospective study.
    Zhang N; Jin X; Yang W; Gu C; Li L; Xu J; Tang Q; Fan W; Meng Y
    World J Surg Oncol; 2023 Jul; 21(1):197. PubMed ID: 37403056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Prognostic and Safety Roles in Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer: A Meta-analysis.
    Cao T; Feng Y; Huang Q; Wan T; Liu J
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2015 Dec; 25(12):990-8. PubMed ID: 26584414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer: A retrospective study.
    Zhang S; Ma L; Meng QW; Zhou D; Moyiding T
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Sep; 96(36):e8005. PubMed ID: 28885364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Efficacy and safety outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy in Chinese older women with cervical cancer compared with laparoscopic radical hysterectomy.
    Luo C; Liu M; Li X
    BMC Womens Health; 2018 May; 18(1):61. PubMed ID: 29716555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Concurrent Learning Curves of 3-Dimensional and Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Using 2-Dimensional Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy as a Benchmark: A Single Surgeon's Experience.
    Ding D; Jiang H; Nie J; Liu X; Guo SW
    Med Sci Monit; 2019 Aug; 25():5903-5919. PubMed ID: 31392971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.