409 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26434669)
81. Urinary and anal dysfunction after laparoscopic versus laparotomic radical hysterectomy.
Laterza RM; Salvatore S; Ghezzi F; Serati M; Umek W; Koelbl H
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Nov; 194():11-6. PubMed ID: 26313524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
82. The toxicity and long-term efficacy of nedaplatin and paclitaxel treatment as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer.
Yin M; Zhang H; Li H; Li X; Liu Y; Chen X; Lou G; Li K
J Surg Oncol; 2012 Feb; 105(2):206-11. PubMed ID: 21815150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
83. Comparative outcomes between robotic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for IB1 cervical cancer: Results from a single high volume institution.
Doo DW; Kirkland CT; Griswold LH; McGwin G; Huh WK; Leath CA; Kim KH
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 May; 153(2):242-247. PubMed ID: 30850169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
84. Comparison of Survival Outcomes after Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Patients with Cervical Cancer.
Hwang JH; Kim BW
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 May; 28(5):971-981.e3. PubMed ID: 33321255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
85. Clinical-pathologic and morbidity analyses of Types 2 and 3 abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
Pikaart DP; Holloway RW; Ahmad S; Finkler NJ; Bigsby GE; Ortiz BH; Denardis SA
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Nov; 107(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 17692367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
86. Ten-year survival of patients with locally advanced, stage ib-iib cervical cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical hysterectomy.
Hwang YY; Moon H; Cho SH; Kim KT; Moon YJ; Kim SR; Kim DS
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Jul; 82(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 11426967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
87. Comparison of urologic complications between laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy: A nationwide study from the National Health Insurance.
Hwang JH; Kim BW; Jeong H; Kim H
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Jul; 158(1):117-122. PubMed ID: 32354468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
88. A comparison of laparascopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and radical abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.
Steed H; Rosen B; Murphy J; Laframboise S; De Petrillo D; Covens A
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Jun; 93(3):588-93. PubMed ID: 15196849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
89. The Outcome of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer in Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Radical Hysterectomy and Primary Surgery.
Mousavi A; Modarres Gilani M; Akhavan S; Sheikh Hasani S; Alipour A; Gholami H
Iran J Med Sci; 2021 Sep; 46(5):355-363. PubMed ID: 34539010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
90. [Comparison of the clinical efficacy of different treatments based on radical surgery in stage Ⅰ b2 and Ⅱa2 cervical cancer: a prospective randomized control study].
Li X; Kong WM; Han C; Yan Z; Zhao H; Zhang WY; Wang JD
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Jul; 51(7):524-9. PubMed ID: 27465872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
91. Safety and Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Radical Surgery Versus Radical Surgery Alone in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Patients.
Gong L; Zhang JW; Yin RT; Wang P; Liu H; Zheng Y; Lou JY; Peng ZL
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 May; 26(4):722-8. PubMed ID: 26905330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
92. [Comparative analysis of neoadjuvant therapies in stage Ib2 and IIa2 cervical carcinoma].
Hu JL; Wu LY; Li N; Li XG; Huang MN; Zhang R
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Jun; 47(6):452-7. PubMed ID: 22932113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
93. Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy with fascia space dissection technique for cervical cancer: description of technique and outcomes.
Liang Z; Chen Y; Xu H; Li Y; Wang D
Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Nov; 119(2):202-7. PubMed ID: 20673971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
94. Outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical hysterectomy for locally advanced cervical cancer at Kigali University Teaching Hospital, Rwanda: a retrospective descriptive study.
Ngabonziza E; Ghebre R; DeBoer RJ; Ntasumbumuyange D; Magriples U; George J; Grover S; Bazzett-Matabele L
BMC Womens Health; 2024 Mar; 24(1):204. PubMed ID: 38555423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
95. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical surgery compared to radical surgery alone in bulky stage IB-IIA cervical cancer.
Behtash N; Nazari Z; Ayatollahi H; Modarres M; Ghaemmaghami F; Mousavi A
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2006 Dec; 32(10):1226-30. PubMed ID: 16952434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
96. Meta-analysis of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy, excluding robotic assisted versus open radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
Marchand G; Masoud AT; Abdelsattar A; King A; Ulibarri H; Parise J; Arroyo A; Coriell C; Goetz S; Moir C; Moberly A; Govindan M
Sci Rep; 2023 Jan; 13(1):273. PubMed ID: 36609438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
97. Robotic vs laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a meta-analysis.
Zhou J; Xiong BH; Ma L; Cheng Y; Huang W; Zhao L
Int J Med Robot; 2016 Mar; 12(1):145-54. PubMed ID: 25823530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
98. Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes of Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy and Total Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis of Data Collected before the LACC Trial.
Pecorino B; D'Agate MG; Scibilia G; Scollo P; Giannini A; Di Donna MC; Chiantera V; Laganà AS
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Oct; 19(20):. PubMed ID: 36293758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
99. Nerve-sparing minilaparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer patients.
Ghezzi F; Cromi A; Uccella S; Bogani G; Sturla D; Serati M; Bolis P
Surg Innov; 2013 Oct; 20(5):493-501. PubMed ID: 23339145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
100. The outcome of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer: a prospective analysis of 295 patients.
Chen Y; Xu H; Li Y; Wang D; Li J; Yuan J; Liang Z
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):2847-55. PubMed ID: 18649105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
